Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Suzuki Swift Sport: first drive review

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
  • Photos

    image

    The little five-door sports hatch gets dual exhausts and a low-key sports body kit that gives the evolutionary design of the normal Swift a lift. Photo Gallery

  • Video

    ...

Stuart Martin road tests and reviews the Suzuki Swift Sport.

Starting an argument about what were the pioneering hot hatches is easy - get Peugeot, VW Golf, Renault and a few other fans of the breed and see if anyone remembers the Swift GTi, which popped up in 1986, a year before the Pug 205 GTi. 

Some will argue the Golf is a size up, others won't rate the little cars and while Suzuki's honest little performer has lost the GTi/GTI tag, the Japanese car maker's new Swift Sport is aiming to maintain the bloodline.

New Suzuki Australia boss Mac Kato, a 30 year veteran of the Suzuki brand, has aims of taking Suzuki into the top 10 and sees the Sport as a hero car to help achieve that. 

"It's one of my favourite cars and after talking to the engineering team, I'm confident that we will be able to continue the Suzuki tradition of building a great hot hatch," he says.

VALUE

The Swift flagship has an upgraded features list and a downgraded price - it's dropped by $1000 to $23,990. 

That's despite an equipment list that includes climate control, a sound system with Bluetooth and USB, cruise control, 17in wheels, bi-xenon headlights, a six-speed manual (up from five cogs) or the option of a continuously-variable transmission (with a seven-speed "manual'' change mode and an electronic lock-up clutch for improved performance).

The price cut and the CVT are expected to put the Sport volumes around 200 per month, with as much as 70 per cent opting for the $2000 CVT. The sports steering wheel has also grown audio, cruise and phone controls, and the features list also includes fog lamps, keyless entry and ignition.

TECHNOLOGY

The 1.6-litre engine has been given a tweak to increase power by 8kW to 100kW and torque has risen from 148 to 160Nm, thanks to a new intake manifold, smoother intake ports and variable valve timing. When under medium load, a valve in the intake is closed, opening when required at high and low engine loads - shortening the intake path and improving the spread of available torque.

The extra urge has not been accompanied by growing thirst - the Sport model still prefers 95RON PULP (it can cope with 91RON) but the number has dropped from 7.3 to 6.5 for the manual - or the optional CVT claims 6.1 litres per 100km. 

There's also 30kg less to haul, as the new Sport tips the scales at 1060kg, thanks to a 10kg lighter bodyshell and the lightweight 17in alloy wheels rolled thinner during a new manufacturing process.

DESIGN

The little five-door sports hatch gets dual exhausts and a low-key sports body kit (including roof lip spoiler) that gives the evolutionary design of the normal Swift a lift. It sits on a wider track and its length has grown by 120 mm over old Sport and its 40mm longer than current Swift model, thanks to different bumpers.

There's an extra 50mm in the wheelbase that Suzuki says improves rear space. The cabin has sports seats (with contrasting red stitching, also on the steering wheel and gearshifter) and pedals.

SAFETY

The Sport has inherited the cooking model's five-star NCAP rating with a safety features list that includes seven airbags (the new car has a driver's knee airbag), as well as stability and traction control, as well as front seat belts with pre-tensioners and load limiters. The Sport model has also been endowed with slightly beefier brakes than the outgoing Sport and the current Swift.

DRIVING

The first few hundred metres in the new Swift Sport hints that the little Suzuki is not trying to be something other than what you see -- a small, perky little hot hatch that is an honest machine.

The seats are comfortable and with adequate lateral support and a good range of adjustment, the sports steering wheel can adjust for reach and rake to get a decent driving position and the six-speed manual is a light and direct shift (there were no CVTs on hand to sample).

Rear space is reasonable given the size of the car, even allowing for my 191cm frame behind the wheel and a similarly-sized person able to sit behind without too much compromise from the driver -- head room is less of an issue than leg room, which is at a premium.

Country back roads with lumps and bumps showed the Sport's ride quality was passable for something that is biased towards handling, although country bumps did make it through a little more than is ideal.

The cabin wasn't invaded horribly by road or engine noise, with little on the way of droning at cruising speed; work it harder and the driver is aware of the powerplant but it's not harsh in its soundtrack. A brief stint on the racetrack showed the little Japanese hatch has decent amounts of grip  as was experienced on the road drive  and feels like it could cope with more from the powerplant.

The track allowed enough pace to be carried to push the nose wide but the stability control was not pessimistic.

VERDICT

4 stars

Suzuki Swift Sport

Price: from $23,990
Warranty: 3-years/100,000km
Resale: N/A% (est.) Source: Glass's Guide
Service Interval: 15,000km/12 months
Safety: 5-star NCAP
Engine: 1.6-litre, 4-cyl petrol, 100kW/160Nm
Body: 5-door hatch
Weight: 1060kg
Transmission: 6-speed manual or 7-speed CVT auto, front-wheel drive
Thirst: 6.5L/100km (6.1 CVT), 95RON, CO2 155g/km (CVT 145g/km)'

RIVALS

imageCitroen DS3 Sport - compare this car
Price: from $29,990
Engine: 1.6-litre, 4-cyl petrol, turbocharged, 115kW/240Nm
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Body: 3-door hatch
Thirst: 6.7L/100km, 95RON, CO2 155g/km

 

imageAbarth 500 Esseesse (Fiat) - compare this car
Price: from $34,990
Engine: 1.4-litre, 4-cyl petrol, turbocharged, 118kW/230Nm
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front drive
Body: 3-door hatch
Thirst: 6.5L/100km, 95RON, CO2 155g/km

 

imageVW Polo GTI 3-dr DSG - compare this car
Price: from $27,790
Engine: 1.4-litre turbo and supercharged 4-cyl petrol, 132kW/250Nm
Transmission: 7-speed twin-clutch automated manual, front-wheel drive
Body: 3 & 5-door hatch
Thirst: 6.1L/100km, 98RON, CO2 142g/km

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 9 comments

  • Why would you want 3 doors??

    Jimmy R Posted on 12 March 2012 3:20pm
  • To be honest the performance is no better than a 2001 TS Astra, virtually same weight and power. The Astra TS was also more practical and roomy and cornered just as well

    David of Sydney Posted on 06 March 2012 4:28pm
  • Yep, disappointed. Wanted it to have 3 doors.

    David of Melbourne Posted on 03 March 2012 8:06am
  • Why don’t we get the 3 door?

    Giarbie of Melbourne Posted on 28 February 2012 6:47pm
  • 70% will opt for the CVT????!!!!!  Goodness me…  Freds comment of “its only $4,000 more than a Polo” is pretty typical.  $4,000 is a lot of money for the people that will buy these cars.  Young females and probably more young men than you’d think.  I had the original Daihatsu Sirion GTVi years ago, and sure it wasnt a sports car, but it was huuuuge fun, and had a screamer of an engine.  In a perfect world, we’d all be driving Golf’s and Polo’s with forced induction and more power than everyone else.  But that would be a bit too… German, for my liking.

    Adam of Tas Posted on 28 February 2012 10:15am
  • Driven one of these and as the review says it’s a good car for what is is but it is far from a sports car, even at this weight it is still basically underpowered to be considered a sport.

    andy of brissy Posted on 27 February 2012 12:32pm
  • ...no spare wheel. Driving over a water filled pot hole at town speed wrecks an alloy wheel, been there, done that. A puncture repair kit is useless. This is the only reaason I won’t be buying a Swift Sport.

    Michael Kuhle of country Victoria Posted on 24 February 2012 7:34am
  • Have you driven one Fred? I can’t speak for the new model, but the previous model was a superb handler of mini like proportions. Sure 100kw doesn’t sound like much, but in a cat that only weighs 1 tonne that is more than enough. Its light weight makes it an excellent handler, even better than the polo GTI, and the 2 would be much closer in performance that their price difference would suggest.

    DAN of sydney Posted on 22 February 2012 11:01pm
  • A Polo GTi is a far better car. Sure it is $4000 more but it has a lot more grunt and refinement. The Swift Sport has less power than a Kia Rio which costs $20,000. It is not really a sporty car. It’s only got 100 kw from an engine that is not even force fed.

    Fred Gerk Posted on 22 February 2012 4:25pm
Read all 9 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links