Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Subaru Outback diesel: review

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
  • image

    Subaru says for 25,000km per year at $90 per 65-litre tankful, an Outback diesel owner could save approximately $2500 over 20 months on an equivalent petrol car. Photo Gallery

Stuart Martin road tests and reviews the Subaru Outback diesel

I was prepared not to like Subaru's first attempt at a diesel.  The Japanese brand has lost my vote when it comes to the new Liberty/Outback styling direction - although the interior is well-equipped and roomier.

A drive in a couple of the new-look models from the Liberty/Outback range had shown better interior room and comfort but a dislike for exterior.  I have, however, regained some faith in the brand after some time in the new diesel.

Drivetrain and Price

Only the lack of an automatic transmission - like the 2.5-litre petrol models' continuously-variable transmission or a more conventional automatic - is an oversight.  The Outback 2.0D meets EuroV emissions standards with 160g/km.

The claimed combined fuel economy figure of 6.4 litres per 100km is frugal for a family-sized wagon and Subaru says local testing suggests an 1100km touring range of steady freeway driving.

We're in the entry-level Outback 2.0D model, priced at $40,490 - a $2500 price premium over the entry-level petrol model - but the 51kg-heavier oil-burner is a manual-only proposition. The new two-litre turbodiesel engine produces 110kW at 3600rpm and 350Nm of torque between 1800 and 2400 rpm, although there's a claimed 300Nm at 1600rpm.

Equipment

The base-model might not have all the bells and whistles but the base-model's sound system is good quality, flooding the comfortable and roomier interior with crisp and clear music.  All-wheel drive, stability control and dual front, side and curtain airbags - as well as an airbag for the driver's knees - are the safety feature highlights.

Driving

You wouldn’t know it's a diesel straight away - the engine isn't overly chuggy or rattly and noise suppression is good; Subaru also claims its new single-cradle engine bay design helps reduce noise.

It doesn't give the impression of a strong low end - the power delivery is linear and smooth for a turbodiesel powerplant, which might normally have a big low-down shove and then run out of puff at higher engine revolutions.  While the petrol 2.5-litre flat-four produces 123kW and 229Nm, the 110kW/350Nm two-litre turbodiesel offers more torque and a reduced thirst of around two litres per 100km.

Subaru says for 25,000km per year at $90 per 65-litre tankful, an Outback diesel owner could save approximately $2500 over 20 months on an equivalent petrol car.

The diesel is rated for up to 1700kg braked towing, a 200kg improvement above the petrol model.  But the lack of automatic will deter plenty in this market, as will the issues with the six-speed maual.

The gearbox itself is OK to use, the shift action is smooth, but the shifting into third gear can result in the driver's hand hitting the hazard light switch.  It's below par for Subaru, a company which normally gets things like that right.

SUBARU OUTBACK DIESEL

Price: from $40,490.
Engine: two-litre 16-valve DOHC common-rail direct-injection four-cylinder.
Transmission: six-speed manual, four-wheel drive using a centre differential with a viscous limited slip differential.
Power: 110kW @ 3600rpm.
Torque: 350Nm between 1800 & 2400rpm.
Performance: 0-100km/h 9.7 seconds.
Fuel consumption: 6.4 litres/100km, on test 7.8 litres/100km, tank 65 litres.
Emissions: 168 g/km.
Suspension: MacPherson strut (front); self-levelling double wishbone (rear).
Brakes: four-wheel discs, front ventilated, with anti-lock and stability control systems.
Dimensions: length 4790mm, width 1820mm, height 1615mm, wheelbase 2745mm, track fr/rr 1535/1530mm, cargo volume 490/1690 litres, weight 1551kg.
Wheels: 17in alloys.

RIVALS


Skoda Octavia Scout, from $39,990.
Suzuki Grand Vitara DDiS, from $35,990.
Nissan X-Trail, from $37,740.
VW Tiguan, from $36,690.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 28 comments

  • Buy a vehicle for its looks or for what it does?. Can’t say I’m in love with the looks BUT certainly Love the way it does things for me. Yes, I have stalled it a few times but that is driver error. The fuel economy at 110kph for me is 5.8l/100, no roof rack, great!. Two sleep in the back with heaps of room and still have places to put the many items req’d for camping. There might be better but doubt it.The wife likes not having to climb up into it, something others require.It’s a keeper!

    Fred Mergl of Manly Posted on 23 March 2012 4:19pm
  • When will Subaru supply diesels with auto transmissions?  It is a great frustration and leaves me hanging back from buying either an Outback or Forester, which would otherwise suit my needs.

    Don of Wellington of Wellington New Zealand Posted on 15 July 2011 10:15am
  • Truly an ugly car. My MY01 2000 Outback has heaps more character and looks. Every Subaru is now boring and butt ugly. So sad.

    Hoju Dingo of canberra Posted on 29 March 2011 11:22pm
  • This is my 5th Subaru and the first Outback I have bought. It?s a different looking wagon but in a Subaru what do you want? A replica of any other wagon that all look the same. The diesel engine is a freak. It pulls like a train and reaches highway cruising speed before you see the flashing lights behind you. It is the ultimate cruising car, stingy on fuel and a comfort to sit in for hours at a time. Averaging between 5 and 7 litres for every 100klms depending on how you push it.

    John Jaworski of Hobart Tasmania Posted on 08 November 2010 7:59pm
  • Interesting to note a lot of negative comments based purely on appearance. Individual likes/dislikes are just that - INDIVIDUAL. The real comments worth noting are those of the folk who actually own and drive one of these vehicles. I picked mine up 12500K ago - just had 1st service done. I have been extremely impressed. Loads of room, comfortable drive position (important for me given 2 x ruptured discs and 2 x stuffed vertebrae in lower back), would have preferred a ‘Real’ spare, but the low speed jobs are becoming more and more common. Fuel economy is great! I have - seriously - been as low as 5L/100Km on highway travel at 100Km/h, cruise control set etc. The interior may not be all plush leather etc, but let’s get real - the design purpose for the vehicle is as a tourer with off-road capability, a “get out into the great outdoors” thing. Do you REALLY want you leather seats and wood trim getting mud, dirt and scratches all over them?? It replaced a Golf - needed more space with 3 growing kids. Though I loved the little VW, I don’t think I could go back (unless for a R32, just for dad to have fun in grin)

    Dazman of Toowoomba Posted on 07 September 2010 11:13am
  • We have now got more than 15,000ks on 2010 manual Outback Diesel.  Same colour as pictures in road test. Easily get 5.8 l/100 k?s sitting 10% over posted speed limits (speedo reads 9k/h fast, so at 119kph indicates 128kph) and 10 l/100ks towing 1300kg load. Really great tourer but need to change driving style in hilly cities - need to use much higher revs before changing into second to get into max torque range in new gear.  Really very happy with car and its looks.  Wrecked an external mirror (hit a duck at speed in dark) - ended up making an insurance claim even though excess was $600 - total cost was $1,000. Great turning circle.  Most irritating issues are the inaccurate speedo and the cloth trim which seems to attract every bit of dirt.  Wished we had gone for the leather.  Interior passenger space seems as roomy as VT Commodore that it replaced - doesn’t compete in the luggage area but with rear seats flat capacity is more than adequate for us.  Dealer threw in full sized spare wheel which does fit into spare tyre well (unlike the Tiguan) - this would have been a deal breaker as we live in the country and travel long distances.

    John of NARRANDERA NSW Posted on 02 September 2010 10:43pm
  • I have just taken owership of my Outback diesel and my impressions so far are very positive. It feels very solid on the road, handles great and is so quiet. I really don’t understand how reviewers can say that the new interior is a “step backwards” for this model from the last. The interior looks great, has everything in the right place and screams quality! Having two young children, my first priority when purchasing a new vehicle was safety. Subaru have run rings around the competition in this area for years and the new model is no exception - Everyday i drive it, i have piece of mind that my family are the safest they can be on the road in this vehicle. In my opinion this is one of if not the best vehicle on our roads - Whether or not this vehicle lives up to the subaru name for reliability, only time will tell, but my advise is for people to drive this car before crossing it off your list - i actually like the exterior design and i think for the money there is no other better value for money vehicle on the road. I agree, its time we stopped listening to these biased toyota reviews looking for extra sales on their Klugers and drive this car, it deserves to sell in better numbers.

    Nathan of NSW Posted on 24 August 2010 10:03pm
  • The 2010 Outback is great. Like they say, if you knew, you would be in a Subaru! The Subaru range of cars have been winning car of year for many years, year after year. Subaru owners will always update to a new Subaru, wonder why!

    donald prus of bassendean wa Posted on 15 August 2010 6:22pm
  • The 4 speed in the Forester may be a gear short of it’s competition, but it shifts quickly, smoothly and doesn’t rev to high when cruising on the highway.

    chris s of Queensland Posted on 24 July 2010 10:48am
  • I read this review before I took the Outback diesel for a test drive and was expecting the worst and how WRONG this review is on more than a few points. I ended up buying one on the day and have now put an enjoyable 1000kms on the odometer.Who cares what your opinion is on the styling , this is subjective and the Outback compares equally against the other Japanese competitors as they are so similar.Outback buyers will go to it if they like what they see.Auto tranny, oversight ? Who buys an auto to go offroad,especially a turbo diesel.Get an auto Liberty station wagon if you want to go to church on Sunday’s,instead of the great Aussie outdoors like I do.All the bells and whistles? Compared to what?Read the specs on the std model and they are AWESOME.What more can you expect for a car around $45K on the road.The lack of a full size spare as well as $2500 for a sat nav are worthy criticisms.Take it from an owner like me, you get used to the 6 spd box and rev/clutch relationship and this is not an issue.Hitting the hazard lights when shifting into 3rd? C’mon get real,get some lessons.Potential buyers,please ignore this review and test drive yourself.

    John Klesk of Melbourne,Victoria. Posted on 20 June 2010 8:20pm
  • I absolutely love my new MY10 Outback. The shape is something that grows on you, but haven’t they got it right inside!  I don’t know where the reviewer’s hand was, but it wasn’t moving the gearstick properly if he slipped and pushed in the hazard lights.  And that engine…she just goes, she goes…she goes!  With brilliant economy.  Can’t wait to get back into it after a hard days work.

    Greg Munyard of Perth Posted on 03 June 2010 4:39am
  • Those people who constantly critisise the look of the Outback/Liberty you are all fools. The look is futuristic. As a current Subaru owner I am seriously getting one. Love the look and ride and handling. Subaru make good cars full stop.

    Paul Posted on 15 May 2010 10:48am
  • It grows on you! The styling that is. I may even buy one. Drives beautifully.

    wef sdgfer of perth Posted on 02 May 2010 4:54pm
  • I love our new manual diesel Outback. It’s not ugly, and heaps better looking than the old style (you old style guys are jealous). It handles very well. It tows our boat without any problems. Plus we save heaps on our fuel bill. There is lots of room too and clearance is awesome. Take it from an owner who has driven four wheel drive vehicles in both outback Australia and Africa for work… it’s a great car.

    Angelique of Perth Posted on 29 April 2010 12:56pm
  • It looks like a bloody Kluger and is just plain ugly, compared to the previous model Outback.

    Ron N of Perth, W.A. Posted on 28 April 2010 2:22pm
  • Subaru certainly knows how to make an ugly car, the current Impreza, the bug eyed Impreza, the previous Tribeca (the current one is not much better) and now the new dog ugly Liberty…or as the previous contributor highlighted…is it a Toyota?

    Please start looking at the Mazda’s and not the Toyota’s.

    Please leave the Forrester alone, my current Liberty is 10 years old and up to almost 200K, I love the mechanics and reliability and the Forrester is now my last Subaru option.

    Glen B of Botany NSW Posted on 16 March 2010 4:50pm
  • the current liberty/outback is too much TOYOTA.  you can see too much toyota parts in it.

    bob Posted on 13 March 2010 1:25pm
  • Remember the Leyland P76 - everything to everybody - a disaster, The car is an ugly box and the brand’s quality coolness had been dumbed down - I have an old Outback 3R and love it - and, will not be replacing it with a new one, instead I updated my wifes Golf.
    How dissapointing, you can see everywhere the accountants at work cutting cost - what segment does it belong in? if I was that desperate for the room I would get a territory - but in the end the US market is the end game, not here.

    Pete B of Melbourne Posted on 01 March 2010 10:25pm
  • too much torque….gearbox being worked on

    Greg of Bondi Posted on 16 February 2010 9:54pm
  • I chuckle. At 8,000 km in 3 months I like this car all the more as I drive it - and I like it a lot to begin with.
    The handling is precise and predictable - very good considering 8” clearance.
    The engine/gearbox combination is great. Pulls like a train. I suspect that for whatever reason Subaru have reigned in the torque at lower RPM deliberately but it is still easy to drive.
    The interior comfort is top notch and I quite like the exterior.
    So take it from someone who owns the car - it’s a great buy.

    Gary of Gold Coast Posted on 07 February 2010 9:04am
  • Glad I read this story - I met some people who like the look of the current Outback/Legacy. 
    I really don’t like the higher profile wheels that sit in an empty wheel arch (yeah they’re cheaper to replace than the 55 series tyres on the old model, but you pay for style), and the sides of the cars are completely flat and square. It looks like it was shoved into a car crusher, and just as the flanks were forced flat with the roof line, they turned the crusher off and were impressed with themselves. 
    This car was designed to increase share in the US market, home to some of the world’s awkwardest looking cars.  Now the Outback looks at home next to the slightly improved looking Tribeca. 
    When the Forester loses its terrible 4speed slush-box for a CVT, I’ll replace my Outback, until then, I’m not inspired by any of the current Subarus.

    JSB of NSW Nth Coast Posted on 30 January 2010 10:17am
  • But, when will they bring out the Auto transmission (6 speed hopefully or even CVT) with the paddles or is there just too much torque?

    Frank of Melbourne Posted on 28 January 2010 3:57pm
  • Like other manufacturers, Subaru cars are following the mainstream path to cut costs. Given it is partly owned by Toyota, what hope have the loyal enthusiasts got to relive that once upon a time unique and quirky characteristic brand.

    Matt Murdock of Perth Posted on 25 January 2010 11:48pm
  • Can’t see that the new Outback is ugly - it’s just another SUV that looks much the same as all the others.  Room is so superior to the previous model that you wouldn’t go back once you have appreciated it. You have to accept that the new shape is now the shape and the previous model is starting to look dated.

    Garry Smith of Gloucester Posted on 24 January 2010 8:42am
  • hmmmmm. Lezzie are you legally blind or been diagnosed with bad taste/ no style or cataracts? A5 sports back looks nothing like this monstrosity. The only thing in common it has with this Subaru is the number of doors it has.

    Luke of Noosa Posted on 21 January 2010 11:50am
  • Not a very nice design in all of the new Liberty/Outbacks. I am happy I bought the run out model. I hope they revise the design in a few years. I think a design along the lines of the Audi A5 Sports back hit the spot.

    Lezzie of Jubilee Avenue Posted on 20 January 2010 9:50pm
  • My God the new Outback is ugly!
    It is impossible to take a good picture of the car from any angle.

    Ezza of Perth Posted on 19 January 2010 9:39pm
  • My God the new Outback is ugly!
    It is impossible to take a good picture of the car from any angle.

    Ezza of Perth Posted on 19 January 2010 9:33pm
Read all 28 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links