Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Skoda Octavia: lacking wow factor

  • By Gordon Lomas and Mark Hinchliffe
  • The Courier-Mail
image The Skoda Octavia sedan has excellent credentials but is not winning Australian motorists’ hearts.

The fact that Skodas are demonstrably cheaper in continental Europe relative to Down Under poses some problem.

Skoda returned to Australia last October with a range of well-equipped models. They are not essentially bad cars, borrowing bits from Volkswagen's huge buying power, but the execution has perhaps not been as perfect as it could have and the pricing in certain offerings leaves us a bit cold.

We drove several models, both the basic Ambiente trim and Elegance.

Basic trim levels are good with reasonable features, while Elegance adds a comprehensive list of extras including auto lights, auto wipers, reversing sensors, cruise control, faux carbon fibre trim and trip computer. Our test cars included the basic models up to the RS.

You can also add various options such as those added to the Elegance sedan that blow the price out. It was tuned with sports suspension, had a wheel package added, satnav and a sunroof which took the normal $33,290 price up to more than $45,000.

For all the froth and bubble, the bottom line is that on first appraisal the Octavia, in its many forms, feels like a $25,000 car.

Allowing for all the kit, the Elegance sedan really is over-the-odds on price.

This German-owned Czech brand remains hobbled by a fair degree of invisibility to most potential buyers.

Now we may be wrong but in this mid-sized segment which the Japanese own through the Toyota Camry/Aurion and the Mazda6, Skoda would hardly register on the radar.

Allowing for all that the Octavia does have redeeming features. The liftback model is very versatile. Fold the rear seats flat and there's enough room for furniture. The boot alone is 560 litres and pumps out to a whopping 1420 litres with the seat down.

The warranty is a respectable three years/unlimited kilometres with roadside assist and service every 15,000km.

All transmissions are smooth but the six-speed automatic direct shift gearbox (DSG), direct from VW and Audi is the pick of them.

The two-litre petrol engine is a bit of a screamer, and both turbo-diesels have annoying initial lag, then a substantial boost from just off idle that tugs at the steering wheel. The 1.9-litre diesel runs out of breath a little early, while the 2-litre pulls further up the rev range.

While the ride is quite compliant even with the optional firmer suspension, there are seemingly ever-present traces of engine, suspension and road noise filtering into the cabin.

The front-wheel drivers have crisp handling, although there is a little more understeer on the diesels with their heavier steel engines up front. The interior is quite smart, and everywhere you look there are switches and buttons and dials from the Audi and VW spare parts bin. Nothing wrong with that either.

Fuel economy on our tests was close to the claimed figures for each model, even though we gave some a few spirited charges.

Apart from awareness, the biggest issue Skoda has with the Octavia, which incidentally is coming to the end of its model life with an all-new car coming next year, is price. It does not seem to be right.

And while there is a little bit of an improvement at both ends of the range — the 1.9-litre diesel and Octavia RS wagon — there still seems to be something missing from the menu.

Yes, it has a bit more grunt and is a little bit flashy here and there but it remains a little soft compared with a hot Audi or VW.

While they were all a pleasurable drive, there was a distinct lack of wow factor.

Even the RS seemed a little tame to be sporting such a badge. Nothing really hits you in the face in terms of flash badging in the cabin, either.

In fairness the RS wagon is a tidy package for a tick under $40,000 and a whole lot cheaper than buying a turbo Audi A4 wagon.

If you have your hearts set on one you can do a lot worse.

But then there is the issue of resale down the track.

What price you will get in two years is anyone's guess, although the diesel models are bound to attract better residuals.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 13 comments

  • Ron, get with the program!!  Skodas have always been innovative cars, even during the communist era.  So much so that the Favorit continued in production under VAG’s ownership, given it’s reputation as a down to earth and useful unit.  Sure there were some branding issues, but they disappeared years ago.  Certain Skodas (Octavia RS and Fabia) and SEATs are definitely the sensible choice in the VAG line-up for those with more sense than money to waste on an Audi.  And the Indian chief’s head Skoda badge goes back decades and is only similar to BMW in that it’s round - just like Mercedes-Benz, Alfa Romeo, Saab, Holden, Fiat…

    Klaus Roederer of Melbourne Posted on 08 April 2008 11:58pm
  • The pick of bunch and one that makes a reasonably compelling case is the Octavia 1.8TFSI.  At $30990 for a rather hath configuration (sedan shape but back glass window lifts open), this comes well equiped and is one of the best drive in 2008.  The creamy smooth engine kicks its heels from a low 1500rpm with 250nm of torque.  It’s punchy in just about any gear.  It even pulls in 6th gear with no turbo lag.  All the while just gently sipping fuel (combine cycle of 7.8l/100km).  I get about 7.4 in my daily commute.  The switch gears are perfectly fine, not Audi level but easily the VW level.  The sticker price is reasonable if you don’‘t select too many options but the standard Elegance Model 1.8TFSI has decent kit (6 CD stacker, heated mirrors, auto headlight, auto wipers, ESP, Traction control and enough airbags to round out the safety items).  What sold me was the class leading engine and the strength of the body, don’t take my words, check it out for yourselves.

    Bob of Melb Posted on 08 April 2008 10:01pm
  • All the Skoda engines currently available are made from grey cast steel. The drive quality of the Octavia range is identical to that of the Jetta. As one of the first technicians to have received training on the new Skoda models in Australia, i can honestly say that by comparison the Octavia would have to be the nicest car Ive driven to date. Its on par with numerous vehicles in its price range and above, even to the extent of saying the ride quality is better than that of the current model Subaru Liberty “also a manufactureer Ive recieved training from.

    CWD Posted on 08 April 2008 8:48pm
  • Well I went out and bought one of these the Octavia Elegance AWD 2 litre Diesel 6 speed man wagon ,drive away $40k and it is a lovely surefooted practical car with heaps of grunt,,,,Try and buy any other brand wagon that is not an oversized envro destroyer that is diesel and awd,,and manual ,,,.I couldnt find one
    Its the perfect compromise and its beautifully built

    Rob graziani of Byron Bay Posted on 08 April 2008 8:14pm
  • This is another attempt by VW/AUDI group to sell another version of their creation. It’s just another VW with other name. The brand lacks charisma/character and it will fail miserably just like their previous attempt…remember SEAT! But unlke SEAT this brand’s value equation seems to be wanting. If I was going to buy $40K car there are better Japanese choices…MAZDA 6, Honda Accord Euro, Subaru Liberty, Toyota Aurion to name a few

    Paul H of Adelaide Posted on 08 April 2008 7:44pm
  • Skoda is going to have to make more of an effort in pricing as well as its dealer network.  We were looking seriously at an Octavia Diesel Wagon, but the dealer could not even offer a firm trade price for our car when we wanted to talk figures…....then took forever to follow up our enquiries…..in the meantime we stretched the little extra and bought a Peugot 307 HDI Wagon…..at least it has a track record with resale and the dealers were willing!

    John of Red Hill Posted on 08 April 2008 1:13pm
  • Chris, your car is rated 3 stars safety. I’d rather my babies ride in a 5 star car thank you very much

    Paul Rodgers of melbourne Posted on 08 April 2008 12:40pm
  • have to say it could have been a nice car to own, the skoda octavia rs that is but the cost made the final choice for us it is way over priced and add a few little extras and the cost just becomes a plain rip off. so what did we settle for a hyundai elite, yep dont laugh to hard after driving them back to back on the same day and on the same roads the elite was the better more civil car and has all the luxury items as standard plus it also has the crash worthiness rating to match. oh yea and there was enough change to go for a weekend away.

    Brett Mills Posted on 08 April 2008 12:36pm
  • In all of the reviews that I’ve read recently, nobody has mentioned the BMW-looking badging and exterior styling or the reputation of the last series of Skodas which were universally considered to be joke cars. Hopefully the Audi/VW link will erase those perceptions based on the previous incarnations.

    Ron Lee of Sydney Posted on 08 April 2008 12:21pm
  • John,
    The Viva has a 4 star safety rating just as the Commodore has.  Refer to the ANCAP site here http://www.ancap.com.au/results/191/

    Chris of Canberra Posted on 08 April 2008 9:58am
  • Chris,you bought a car with a virtually zero safety rating than one with 5 stars..Amazing..Let us know how you fare after your first (hope not ) prang..

    John Kiprov of melbourne Posted on 07 April 2008 10:34pm
  • Well I have not test driven Skoda Octavia RS. But I did sat inside it during Melbourne Auto Show. The standard equipment list are superb and overall $40k was not bad at all, undercutting the VW Golf GTI which have same engine as RS. The interior finish is very good however the buttons look cheap. It’s a bargain performance car I might say but one question is how the resale price will end up if I decide to sell it? Even more Skoda is not known to many people yet and its credibility and reputation still being questioned.

    JPH Posted on 07 April 2008 6:16pm
  • We returned from the UK in May 2004 and I had waited and waited for Skoda to arrive. We were one of the first customers to drive a car at our local dealer and were impressed with everything except the price. Here is a car that competes with an Astra in the UK, but which is thousands dearer here. Last year we were not ready to buy but were advised that they ‘could do a little better’ on the trade-in price. We went to have a look in February. Would not do any better on our trade-in as they had ‘drive away pricing’. So here we were looking to spend about $35000ish on a new small/medium wagon. What did we just take delivery of? A new Holden Viva for $22900. Yes, the Skoda is a better car. It has a larger load area, better engine, better trim etc. BUT, it also has potentially high servicing costs and a HUGE difference in price. We would have bought the Skoda if it had been less expensive. $30-32000 for an auto elegance wagon and we would not have thought about it. Much as I liked the car, I am glad we did.

    Chris of Canberra Posted on 07 April 2008 3:37pm
Read all 13 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links