Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Porsche Panamera S Hybrid: review

  • By Karla Pincott
  • Carsguide
  • Photos

    image

    The Panamera "family car" has been one of the best decisions Porsche has made. Photo Gallery

  • Video

    ...

Karla Pincott road tests and reviews the Porsche Panamera S Hybrid at its international launch in Austria.

Sports cars made the Porsche name, but what made its fortune was an SUV and a sedan. The Cayenne offroader and the Panamera ‘family car’ have been two of the best decisions the brand has made. And they’ve kept remaking them with a continuing roll-out of variations. So, following in the trail of the five Panamera variants already here, and the diesel arriving in August, comes the hybrid version. Or two.

VALUE

You can knock $5300 off the $298,300 price by shelling out a mere $290 for the set of low rolling-resistance tyres that drop fuel consumption to 6.8L/100km -- bringing it in under the Luxury Car Tax 7L/100km discount barrier for a final price of $292,927.

But with the standard wheels and tyres, the car’s economy is still claimed to be a low 7.1L/100km – so if you want to show green cred but not give up speed or luxury, it’s just as viable.

For that you also get a stack of luxury equipment, including the touchscreen ‘comms’ and Bose audio system, adaptive air suspension that adjusts ride firmness and height, dynamic cornering lights, bits of leather, 14-way power-adjustable heated front seats and two-zone climate-control airconditioning. But no spare tyre – there’s a sealant kit instead.

TECHNOLOGY

The drivetrain is from the Cayenne S Hybrid: a 245kW/440Nm 3.0-litre petrol V6 supported by a 34kW/300Nm electric motor connected to a nickel metal hydride (NiMh) battery that stores energy captured while braking.

It’s the first Panamera to get the Cayenne’s 8-speed sequential auto, with gearchanges adapted to better suit hybrid driving and the top two gears set for reduced revs to help economy.

The fuel-saving story also includes a stop-start system and the separating clutch that at speeds up to 165km/h disengages the engine when you lift off the accelerator, allowing you to ‘sail’ (as Porsche calls it) without drawing on the fuel tank.

It gives an electric-only range of 2km on flat ground – not a great distance, but enough to make for a guilt-free run to the corner shop, thumbing your nose at cyclists and walkers along the way.

But the Panamera still has Porsche bloodlines under its greenish skin, so there are performance tricks like the boost mode triggered by accelerator kickdown, which combines the engine and electric motor’s outputs and delivers a total 279kW and 580Nm for a brief few seconds. And it’s no slouch at 6.0 seconds for 0-100km/h, with a top speed 270 km/h.

To bring the go back to whoa, there’s a dual-circuit brake system with separate circuits for each axle, with six-piston anchors at the front and four-piston at the rear.

DESIGN

The Aston Martin Rapide and Maserati Quattroporte both succeeded in adding a couple of doors to a largely coupe design, and coming out stunners. Panamera… not so much. Its bulbous butt looks awkward attached to what is essentially a 911-themed nose. But it’s form following function: in the Panamera’s back seat you get usable space and comfort for two adults. In the Brit and Italian you get leg cramps.

SAFETY

It hasn’t been crash-tested yet, but with a strong body and arsenal of safety features, it should rate the full five stars.

DRIVING

With our initial drive an economy challenge on the ‘green’ tyres, running the Panamera on the electric side was surprisingly pleasant. The changes as it switches from engine to battery are barely perceptible – although you notice when it changes back again – and the sailing mode is nearly seamless. Unless you have the ‘E-power’ mode activated to suppress the swap to engine, it tends to flick over there on the slightest accelerator input.

On an economy run, we managed to hit 6.9L/100km at one stage, and bring it in at 7.1L at the end of 90km. So the claimed fuel figures are achievable, but only if you keep constant watch on the instrument panel – and nobody wants to drive like that. Or at least, not in a Panamera.

The ride is firmer than you’d expect for a luxury sedan, but that isn’t helped by the low rolling-resistance tyres, which clatter over patchy bitumen.

But while you’re not going to push the car to track limits on that kind of rubber, they perform better than expected, holding on well enough for mildly enthusiastic driving even on a damp road.

What works against their fuel-saving is that the Panamera is so smooth that it’s too easy to have the speed creep up without you noticing – which could be a danger to your wallet in other ways too.

Porsche Panamera S Hybrid

Price: from $292,927
Safety: untested
Engine: 3.0-litre petrol V6 245kW/440Nm plus electric motor 34kW/300Nm
Transmission: 8-speed Tiptronic; rear-wheel drive
Body: 4-door sedan, seats 4
Weight: 1980kg
Thirst: 7.1L/100km; 6.8L/100km; 95 RON; CO2 168g/km; 167g/km; 159g/km

 

OTHERS TO CONSIDER

Aston Martin Rapide

Engine: 5.9-litre V12; 350kW/600Nm
Trans: 6-speed auto; rear-wheel drive
Body: 4-door sedan
Thirst: 14.9L/100km, 95RON.
Better looking by far, but even less room in the rear
Price: $366,194

Maserati Quattroporte

Engine: 4.2-litre V8; 295kW/460Nm
Trans: 6-speed auto; rear-wheel drive
Body: 4-door sedan
Thirst: 14.7L/100km, 95RON.
Stunning looks, fantastic sound,
Price: $286,000

Lexus LS 600hL

Engine: 5-litre V8; 290kW/520Nm
Trans: 8-speed auto; rear-wheel drive
Body: 4-door sedan
Thirst: 9.3L/100km, 95RON.
Brilliantly equipped, even for this price, but staid
Price: $245,244

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 7 comments

  • The Masked Commenter, it is not surprising that they are similar, as both are trying to achieve perfect aerodynamics for improved performance and fuel consumption.  It is also a bit too rounded to be all that much like a Ferrari.

    jeeves of hobart Posted on 23 May 2011 2:23pm
  • Calm down Andrew of Malvern, it’s ok, really. Did I say anything else negative about the car? No, I just pointed it out. I don’t understand the point of spending so much on car that is not really any quicker than a Mazda 3 MPS. If I’m spending this much I’d want a car that’s totally awesome on all levels. Besides, if you’re able to fork out over a quarter of a million on a car (plus the interest on the loan don’t forget) you’re probably in a position to not really care about the cost of fuel. But meh

    alex Posted on 19 May 2011 1:14pm
  • Alex, if 0-100 times are all you are interested in then that is what the Turbo version is for. For those that don’t want to use as much fuel, well then you have the Hybrid S.

    Andrew of Malvern Posted on 18 May 2011 5:52pm
  • A hybrid Porsche, bit like chucking a buck in a Salvos tin as you exit a fancy restaurant, makes you feel better, but still doesn’t excuse the rampant consumerism.
    Oh and Chuck, maybe you should have got off the freeway and had a look at the rest of the US, like the middle and the south.  Dirt poor, I pity the poor buggers, wonder how long before they rise up. The rich may be richer, but the poor are poorer than Australia.

    Trev Posted on 18 May 2011 12:37pm
  • Anyone else think the front end is a Ferrari rip off? It looks less Porsche and more Ferrari to me.

    The Masked Commenter of Brisbane Posted on 18 May 2011 10:00am
  • Why is the Porsche Panamera $292,000.00 in Australia, and $98,000.00 in the United States?  Sure, I understand Porsche sells more cars to the United States then all other countries combined, but still a $200,000.00 difference?

    By the way, have you been to America lately.  We’re led to believe they’re having a tough go at it?  Please.  We recently returned from Los Angeles and drove to San Francisco, the cars seen on the motorways is amazing.  Mercedes, BMW’s, Porsches etc etc etc and the million dollar homes, city after city after city.    The wealth in the United States, makes us Australians look like we’re from a third world nation, with nothing but Camry’s and Hyundai’s to drive.

    Chuck Posted on 18 May 2011 6:02am
  • A 0-100 time of 6 secs is horribly slow for this sort of price range.

    alex Posted on 17 May 2011 4:03pm
Read all 7 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links