Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Outlander: is it ?outdoorsy? material?

  • The Sunday Times
image

Mitsubishi keeps the off-road dream alive with fabulous marketing techniques.

Don't you just love marketing? It tailors a campaign, not a product in order to attract a market. The product, good or bad, remains the same. Only the campaign changes. And so it is with car marketers selling the spirit of adventure.

As if to compensate for any lack of off-road ability in the great outdoors, marketers simply give the car a great ourdoorsy name.

So we end up with vehicles like the Mitsubishi Outlander that has, at best, a rice paper-thin relationship with anything outdoors.

This may not surprise, but the Outlander is selling its socks off and is Australia's fourth top-seller in the compact SUV segment.

So, clearly, I know nothing about marketing. But I do appreciate a good all-wheel-drive wagon.

The Outlander is a well-built, trimly proportioned and attractive five or seven-seater wagon with a choice of two engines and a competitive price.

It is built on the same platform as the upcoming Lancer sedan, here later this month and hence its impotent ability to survive a trip into the outdoors.

But what it can do is become the caravan for your children's excesses, the conveyance for your kayak or mountain bike, the carriage for Sunday picnics and the transport for work and school. It does all these things very well because the Outlander is a very simple vehicle.

The V6 in the Outlander VRX tested may seem a bit excessive in terms of power and fuel use. But that's only because you haven't driven the alternative a 2.4-litre, four-cylinder that is pleasantly competent with one person aboard, but asthmatic and noisy when loaded. The three-litre V6 has been shared around the Mitsubishi model range and still stacks up as a responsive unit.

Mated to a six-speed automatic gearbox, it's also not as thirsty as you may think.

The test route included a bit of gravel, some highway and lots of city work, and used a commendable 11.7 litres/100km. Country touring should snip that back to about 10 litres/100km which gives a range of 600km, a bit too short for an SUV.

It handles the roads with ease, thanks to an all-wheel-drive system that allocates power to the axles depending on demand.

As such, it rates high in the safety stakes. The VRX version enforces that with electronic stability control, ABS brakes and six airbags.

The Outlander has a default to front-wheel-drive and will drive all wheels only when it senses a loss of traction or when the driver engages 4WD via a dashboard switch.

The 4WD system can also be locked for low-speed work. The cabin is attractive with a clean dash layout, a fantastic array of storage bins and for the VRX a range of features, including a sensational Rockford Fosgate sound system.

It seats five, though there is a seven-seat option that will accommodate two children, but take up most of the boot.

The cargo area can be extended by folding down the rear seats and while spacious, is narrower than most rivals.

This is a good car. The V6 costs about $6000 more than the four-cylinder version, but is the better choice.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 6 comments

  • just bought a new VRX outlander & have been in touch with Mitsubishi about the stupid space-saver spare wheel .I asked where i put it with 4 people plus luggage on board when i get a puncture? they replied "never thought of that !! " At one point i was told they where modifying the carrier for a full size spare but now they seem a bit confused about that ! Do i throw my wheel away after heavy rain clogged with mud i sure as hell am not putting it on the back seat with my passengers and it wont go in the back because of luggage—not very happy after spending lots of $$$  Peter

    peter laws Posted on 02 October 2007 10:59am
  • Mitsubishi has always made some very good cars like the Evo,Pajero and Lancer.But they are a bit awkward in marketing their products properly and sometimes they tend to price the vehicles high onpar with Toyota or Honda but they have to match the perception of people and then go for high end pricing.But now they are becomming competitive the Pajerolooks great,The Outlander is catching sales.The new Lancer is stunning.And the i car looks great that could prove to be a winner also considering Fiat 500 is getting so much attention.
    Mitsubishi has a big advantage over Toyota that their cars handle well even though they cant match Toyota on relability.

    Rakesh Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • Buy a Pajero VRX DID Auto

    Bruce McCann Posted on 27 September 2007 10:11am
  • I picked up my LS Outlander at the beginning of Aug. So far I have been very happy with my purcahse. Had a look at the other SUV's and none dollar per dollar stacked up against the Outlander. As for fuel consumption I have never seen my Outlander use more then 12L and thats usually in the morning when I first start up. I have seen the fuel usuage drop to as low as 8.3L for an average of low to mid 9's which I think is pretty good as I mainly drive around town a lot.  I think the problem is alot of people get sucked in by the CVT gearbox because it doesnt change gears like a normal auto, hence people tend to drive the car lot harder than is required which of course increases fuel usuage. As for looks I think this is the best looking SUV on the market. Heaps of peope always ask me what type of vehicle that is and are surprised when I tell them its a Mitsubishi! I think that Mitsubishi are now starting to make some great vehicles with up to the minute technology. If only they advertised the Outlander a bit more, instead of trying to be Austalias best keep secret!

    Brian Trevor Posted on 26 September 2007 4:21pm
  • Hi, on my recent trip to Sydney I was fortunate to be updated to the Outlander for free. I am overjoyed, but it was short lived. The outlander lacked power and the fuel consumption was a disaster. It drank like free beer, yes 18L/100 kms. Now that is way above average for a 4 cylinder. When i dialed the 2 wheel drive the consumption dropped to a huge 16L/100 km.
    Now with the price of fuel these days, why on earth would you buy anything like this. Good luck Mitsubishi.

    MACK Posted on 26 September 2007 10:23am
  • We have had an LS (2.4 ltr) since March this year. While the V6 may have more poke, the 2.4 is not bad at all. Has some zip and the economoy is obviously better. Not difficult to get less than 10 ltrs per 100 kms around town. It also goes well on the highway, even fully loaded.

    Great features although the interior finish on the dash and doors can mark easily.

    Overall very happy with our purchase.

    Darren Posted on 26 September 2007 10:23am
Read all 6 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links