Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Mazda CX-9: muscle machine in disguise

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
image The new Mazda CX-9's styling covers up the largeness of this machine.

Mazda's CX-9 might resemble its smaller sibling but that's where comparisons end.

Double-takes from CX-7 drivers were not uncommon during my time in the biggest member of Mazda's SUV range - the CX-9. The exterior lines might be similar but there are big differences between the five and seven-seat Mazda kid-carriers.

The slimming CX-9 styling hides quite a sizeable machine, which at just over 5m long and nearly 2m wide is no waif.

While Mazda says it has 200mm of ground clearance it looks low-slung and almost sleek, suggesting snow-bunny locales and A-grade dirt are more this SUV's forte than rock-hopping.

From behind the wheel its dimensions become more apparent - slipping into tight car spaces is helped by the presence of a rear-view camera but radar sensors would be a worthwhile addition to the features list.

The drivetrain is smooth and quiet, although it has to shift two tonnes of Mazda, which means it has plenty of work to do.

It's not the sweetest engine from the Mazda stable when working hard, nor is it the most frugal, returning figures in the 16 litres/100km (it's ADR claim is 13 litres/100km), which is about par for the petrol-powered opposition in the class.

But the seven-seater has plenty to like. The features list includes 20 inch wheels, sunroof, front and rear airconditioning and cruise control.

The Luxury edition also gets leather trim, a leather-wrapped steering wheel with audio and cruise control switch gear, electrically-adjustable heated front seats and rain-sensing wipers.

The CX-9 also packs a good range of safety gear, including stability control (with roll-over sensing function) and dual front, front-side and full-length curtain airbags.

The Luxury edition also gets a good-quality Bose sound system with sub-woofer, controlled by the touch screen that also carries the rear camera images, but sun glare from the heavily-raked windscreen can interfere.

The big Mazda is reasonably nimble but the electronics kick in quickly if pushed hard, making sure the two-tonne machine is reined in early, but most drivers won't push it to the same degree.

The passenger accommodation is comfortable, with the middle row of seats able to slide fore and aft to give the third row a little extra leg room.

The third-row seats fold flat into the floor but even with them up there's still some room for cargo, although it won't be enough for a weekend away for seven, but five passengers and their bags will fit.

Ride comfort is on the firm side - the is price for some agility.

The new Mazda is heading into SUV segment that showed the most sales growth last year - up against Ford's Territory, Holden's Captiva, Toyota's Kluger and the new-look Subaru Tribeca - and it deserves to be on the seven-seater medium SUV shopping list.

 


Small torque

Mazda CX-9 luxury

Price: $57,265.

Engine: 3.7-litre DOHC 24-valve V6.

Transmission: Six-speed automatic.

Power: 204kW at 6250rpm.

Torque: 366Nm at 4250rpm.

Performance: 0-100km/h 8.5 seconds. Top speed 250km/h (governed).

Fuel economy: 13 litres/100km, tank capacity 76 litres:

Emissions: 309g/km.

Suspension: MacPherson strut (front). Multi-link (rear).

Brakes: Four-wheel ventilated discs.

Dimensions: Length 5074mm, width 1936mm, height 1728mm, wheelbase 2875mm, track fr/rr 1654/1644mm, cargo volume 267/928 litres, weight 2080kg.

Wheels: 20in. alloys.

In its class:

Ford Territory Ghia: $56,990.

Holden Captiva Maxx: $43,990.

Toyota Kluger Grande: $64,490.

Subaru Tribeca 3.6R Premium: $58,990.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 21 comments

  • There is no compromise with VW. Therfore they would not try and make a vehicle that is supposed to be a SUV and a people mover in one. IT DOESN"T WORK!!! Volkswagens are built to be good at what they are made for. Unfortunately Mazda shows no passion and builds the CX-9, a car that is terrible at everything it tries to do. It is useless off-road and at moving 7 people and their gear. Get a Multivan if you want a people mover, a Toureg if you want an SUV.Simple as that.

    Fred Gerk Posted on 03 January 2012 9:34pm
  • Very nice car, would own one anyday outclass any VW.

    Brian Stone of Deloraine Posted on 30 December 2011 12:00pm
  • Thank You,

    name of cTugvRFR Posted on 07 February 2011 12:57pm
  • will hydroeye affect blood sugar <a >antidiabetic</a>  genital herpes reduce symptoms <a >Xenical</a>  nursing care and education of angelman syndrome

    PekFlottetill of herpes types Posted on 17 January 2009 1:23pm
  • The site very professional! Keep up the good work! Oh yes, one extra comment - maybe you could add more pictures too! So, good luck to your team!

    Vardenafil of generic levitra online Posted on 19 November 2008 9:25am
  • Pretty nice site, wants to see much more on it! smile

    John Williams Posted on 20 August 2008 3:51pm
  • I purchased a cx-9 in may ie a month back and whilst i love the car and the look . The petrol is no way near the 13km per 100km and its been back under warranty 3 times . Once for the sat nav once for the sun roof and another time for the petrol cap lever. Since then I also noticed mud flap missing which appears to have never been there. Needless to say I am so dissapointed and after tossing up between the Kluger and the CX-9 (I previously owned a Kluger grande and had no problems) I wish I had gone the Kluger . The cx-9 is such a let down!

    Rita Panuccio of Sydney Posted on 17 June 2008 1:33am
  • Yeah!.....as of approx. 5th or 6th of March Mazda Australia loaded onto their website, as an accessory for the CX9, Satellite Navigation. At $2265 gst inclusive it appears to be reasonably priced also. No picture yet.

    Anthony Graham of Sydney Posted on 06 March 2008 2:13pm
  • As for Sat Nav, its not listed yet on the Mazda website, but I have heard of people now getting it fitted from the dealers before taking delivery.

    Clarko of Gold Coast Posted on 05 March 2008 5:44am
  • Quote from Morris Dancer - “Anyone needing a 7-seater for urban use would be financially better off - and a lot safer - in a people-mover. “
    You better stick to dancing Morris, how do you figure a people mover would be safer than an AWD which has 10 air bags(even for third row) and more safety features than anything else on the planet, such as Antilock brakes, Dynamic Stability control, Roll Stability control, Intrusion minimising brake pedal, not to mention a 5star crash test rating in the US, plus special rear end crash protection for the third row,
    GO FIGURE?

    Clarko of Gold Coast Posted on 05 March 2008 5:41am
  • Attn: Iain Ross - Whitsundays.  re: ‘Oh and guess what…. it has a sat nav system factory from Mazda… Maybe you should re read the specs sometime and get your facts straight.’.......Iain- sincerely, I want to be wrong, I want it to have this feature, I want to give Mazda Australia my money to have it, I want Mazda to make my decision easier between CX9 & Kluger Grande.  Iain - prove me wrong & post the url/link to the page on the Mazda Australia website that supports what you wrote - please.

    Anthony Graham of Sydney Posted on 29 February 2008 9:23pm
  • Attn: Iain Ross - Whitsundays.  re: ‘Oh and guess what…. it has a sat nav system factory from Mazda… Maybe you should re read the specs sometime and get your facts straight.’.......Iain- sincerely, I want to be wrong, I want it to have this feature, I want to give Mazda Australia my money to have it, I want Mazda to make my decision easier between CX9 & Kluger Grande.  Iain - prove me wrong & post the url/link to the page on the Mazda Australia website that supports what you wrote - please.

    Anthony Graham of Sydney Posted on 29 February 2008 6:55am
  • ” ... it looks low-slung and almost sleek, suggesting snow-bunny locales and A-grade dirt are more this SUV’s forte than rock-hopping.”

    There’s no need for Stuart Martin to beat around the bush - the CX-9’s raised ride height and on-demand drive system don’t qualify it for anything resembling off-road drivng.

    Worse, they can only adversely affect its on-road handling and traction capabilities compared to conventional on-road AWD cars.

    This vehicle, like all soft-roaders, is really only for people who do a lot of driving on ‘all-weather’ unsealed roads.

    Anyone needing a 7-seater for urban use would be financially better off - and a lot safer - in a people-mover.

    'Morris Dancer' (freelance 4WD journalist) of Sydney Posted on 21 February 2008 12:42am
  • Ok i’m going to clear a few things up for you all…
    Before you start making statements that aren’t true ( Mr graham)
    I sell Mazda, and the CX-9 is very popular so far, we also have 1 on as a demo vehicle which has so far done 4000km. We’re getting on average 13.4L/100km. Oh and guess what…. it has a sat nav system factory from Mazda…  Maybe you should re read the specs sometime and get your facts straight.
    And from what i hear they will be replacing all space savers with proper rims and tyres… just like they have on the CX7

    Great car, great drive, it is what it is and hey.. i love it

    Iain Ross of Whitsundays Posted on 20 February 2008 4:50pm
  • Your all talking through your hats! I Own a new CX9 Luxury and I’m told on US forums that there fuel economy gets heaps better when they get a few thousand K’s on them, yet mine has only 800k and already is averaging 12.5L/100k.
      And for those who think they lack torque??? 5th and 6th gear is extremely high, like cruising 100kph = 1650rpm, 150kph = 2500rpm, sink the right foot and this thing will jump back a few gears and haul arse, and they rev clean to 7000rpm.
      As for rear DVD, they are NOT available in the US either on vehicles fitted with sun roofs.
      And dont worry about the spare wheel, it is not a small space saver, it will travel at speeds a lot faster than most of you are capable of driving.
      In summary this is an awesome car and has quality oosing from it that other brands could only dream of.

    Clarko

    Clarke Hudson Posted on 19 February 2008 7:45pm
  • Anthony….thanks for the advice on the SatNav availability.  Think I will stick to my $300 Navman anyway grin

    DM Posted on 18 February 2008 12:21pm
  • DM- re: ‘SatNav is available as a $3K option on the CX9’ ....NO IT IS NOT. There are people who post such statements in various forums and they are incorrect. Mazda remains the only ‘quality’ brand in the Australian marketplace that does not respect the Australian customer enough to offer this as an option. Not only do they not offer it on the CX9 - they don’t offer it on any Mazda vehicle.

    Anthony Graham of Sydney Posted on 15 February 2008 8:21pm
  • I have driven one , great classy car but with a little effort could have been brilliant. For a two tonner it need a more powerful motor, low down torque is seriously lacking and fuel economy is very poor, at 16litres a 100km,r ivaling my old 93 petrol 2.5 tonne landcruiser tank with roof rack. Hiway best I hear is at least 14.
    Parking sensors should be standard as the front and even the rear are hard to judge, even with rear camera, essential in my book on such a style. A split rear hatch also is lacking and the hatch is heavy and massive. Pathetic that the luxury model had been cut down from the US model, rear DVD s are missing as are the other car to the rear sides sensors, why do they treat Australians in such a way? Sun roof would be a lot better if it wasn’t so small or there were two like some competitors.
    From what I have seen the standard model doesn’t seem to exist in Australia so why advertise them?
    If Mazda had addressed some of these things they would sell a million. $60 grand plus on the road is a lot of bikkies and taking the exchange rate into consideration with the US we get the short end of the stick as usual. The standard model there starts around 30 grand. On top of that dealers here are insisting on prices very close to retail so I doubt they will get their 400 a month. It is a very competitive market but Mazda does blow the competition away in some areas but certainly not all. Near enough is not good enough these days

    Robert Withall Posted on 15 February 2008 4:15pm
  • DM- I disagree, I have driven the CX7 (a bit coarse around town) and the CX9 from Mazda and a few other of these “on demand” AWD’s. They come no where near a permament AWD vehicle in the handling stakes, and these FWD supposedly AWD vehicles love the tyres! I think you’ll find the spare is speed limited as stated by the manufacturer, and not recommended for any serious distance, a fat lot of good that is on a long trip or a Sunday on the way back home from a decent trip. Still - no doubt it will sell well, my argument is how they advertise these things, I’ve seen a few of this type of vehicle which are really people movers in another guise bogged in beach sand without a hope of getting out. Owners think they do what a true fulltime AWD or 4WD can.

    shipo Posted on 15 February 2008 2:57pm
  • Shipo…...Its an On-Demand 4WD System but having driven both on-demad & constant 4WD systems the average punter will never tell the difference in real world driving.  I used to be a AWD snob but the difference really is neglible.
    At the end of the day, as long as AWD operates when you need it, who cares about the rest of the time.
    The spare wheel is smaller but at 195 (v standard 245) it is hardly useless.  Agree a full size would be better but this is part of the compromise when you have 3rd row seats that fold flat into the floor.
    SatNav is available as a $3K option on the CX9

    DM Posted on 14 February 2008 3:54pm
  • Another car promoted as All Wheel Drive - it ain’t! It’s FWD with mechanics to allow AWD in some situations. And a skinny spare (from what the dealer tells me) - these should be banned, they are next to useless, just as useless as run flats.
    No Satnav is available (same for CX7 and come to think of it ALL Mazda’s). It sounds like a thirsty beast, but no doubt is a quality incorrectly advertised product with flaws

    Shipo of Sydney Posted on 14 February 2008 2:06pm
Read all 21 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links