Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Mazda CX-7: review

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • image

    The first major update this year to the CX-7 includes a 2.5-litre petrol starter engine and, more importantly to fuel misers, a turbodiesel. Photo Gallery

Paul Gover and Alison Ward road test and review the Mazda CX-7

The first time I drove the Mazda CX-7 I was impressed. The 7 looked very good, drove more like a car than a four-wheel drive, was practical in the cabin, and finished to the standard you expect when you slide in behind a Mazda badge.

The more I drove it, mostly the more I liked it. There was a bit of delay in response from the turbocharged petrol engine, but nothing major. And it was more than compensated by the grip in corners and the way the CX-7 responded to the wheel.  It felt like Mazda had made a major breakthrough on the people mover front.

Then I stopped at the petrol station . . . and everything changed. The CX-7 was averaging 14.7L/km and that was enough to put me off it.  I was still happy to tell people to put the CX-7 on their shopping list, but I always warned about a V8-style thirst for city work and open-road economy that was still nothing special.

Mazda heard the complaints, and there must have been a few, because it has reacted as quickly as possible to get some fuel economy into the CX-7.  The first major update this year to the CX-7 includes a 2.5-litre petrol starter engine and, more importantly to fuel misers, a turbodiesel.

There are other changes and improvements _ including a bigger grille, better noise suppression and an updated cabin that picks up a lot of stuff from the latest Mazda3 _ but it's the engines that got my interest.  The diesel in particular.

Mazda has been slow to move to diesel power for its passenger vehicles, like every other Japanese maker, but has had non-petrol power in the 3 and 6 for a while now. The engines have excellent pulling power and great economy, but you have to like shifting yourself because there is no automatic gearbox capable of handling the incredible twisting force created by the diesel.

It's the same with the CX-7, because the 2.2-litre diesel only comes with a six-speed manual gearbox and all-wheel drive. Still, the economy claims are good at 7.6L/100km and the price is fine at $43,640 with equipment including satnav, leather seats, Bose sound and the usual stuff on the aircon and power steering/windows front.

The CX-7 line now starts with the 2.5-litre petrol model and a price of $33,990, which is good buying for a five-seater family wagon with front-wheel drive, a five-speed manual gearbox, six airbags, ESP and anti-skid brakes, alloy wheels and the rest.  Oh, and the starter car also has 9.4L/100km economy.

So Mazda is doing what it can to spark more interest in the CX-7 and the four-model range ticks most of the boxes with prices up to the Luxury Sports at $45,990 that is expected to win half of all sales.

But . . . and it's a big one . . . the competition in the SUV family class is incredibly tough. Rivals run from the Suzuki Grand Vitara and Subaru's Outback to the Kia Sorento, Ford Territory and many more. Including my personal favourite, the Volkswagen Tiguan.

Driving

The latest CX-7 is much as I remember it, and a little bit more.  It's good to see the multi-purpose dash display including a rear-view camera and satnav, although _ just like the Mazda3 _ it really needs to be bigger, the equipment level is good, the cabin is comfy and quiet, and there is space in the back for three adults without compromising the luggage area.

The CX-7 still drives like a car, which I really like. It's not sloppy or floppy like so many SUVs, even if some shoppers should also be considering the excellent drive of the Territory. And the Tiguan is now awful, either.

So we come to the engine.  The arrival of a diesel is great news and I watch carefully on the dash display to monitor the economy. Mazda claims 7.6L/100km and it's easy to beat that on the highway. Right now it's running at 8.2, a figure confirmed at the bowser, which is pretty good.  It also means a great touring range beyond 900 kilometres between stops.

The torque of the turbodiesel, even for people who don't know a thing about the technicalities, means it has great pulling power at any time in any gear. It will happily lug around town in a high gear and the overtaking performance is great.

Were you waiting for a 'but'? Well, here it comes and it's another big one.  The gearbox in the diesel CX-7 is totally inappropriate for a family hauler intended for suburban work. It's a six speed manual, which means lots of shifts even with that towering torque. And the shift itself is slow and baulky, with a clutch that needs to be held right on the floor for smooth changes.

It is definitely not a car you would want to be shop-starting through traffic every day.  It's such a pity, because the CX-7 is a very good people mover with a fair lick of Mazda's sports car DNA to make it an enjoyable drive. I would like to recommend the diesel without any reservations, but until there is an automatic gearbox it still comes with a but.

She says - Alison Ward

I think the new diesel Mazda CX-7 is a bit of an 'if only' car.  If only this otherwise safe and comfortable car had an automatic gearbox.  For me, an automatic is essential and I find it hard to understand why Mazda would go the trouble of creating such a great long-range diesel engine and not have gone the extra distance with creating the auto to match.

The car has plenty of pick-up and lives up to the 'zoom-zoom' reputation as I could negotiate most roads in second, sometimes third gear, without changing.    This is handy for a lazy runabout driver like myself. I am too busy talking to the bubs in the back to be worried about gear levers.

Anyway, I think most customers would prefer the auto as most customers would be mums doin' the school run. They don't want to fuss with this and certainly won't like the fussy clutch that needs your foot flat to the floor before you can change the gears.  Once out on the open road or freeway, driving it was easy and I did feel I was in control when taking corners.

I liked the varied cupholder areas and there was ample space in the back for prams and extra bits and bobs.  The seats were comfy to me and there was enough legroom to get car seats in and out with ease.

The sat-nav and reversing camera is a great plus, but the screen appeared tiny inside such a big interior. You almost need a magnifier for it.  The air-con doesn't include vents to the rear seats, which means you freeze in the front to cool the people sweltering in the back.  It's a minus for me, as the car has front seat heaters which I would swap any hot summers' day for extra air-con vents.  But don't get me wrong, it's a good car. I do like it.

Score 72/100

THE BOTTOM LINE: Better but still not bestMazda CX7 Diesel Sports

PRICE $43,640

ENGINE 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel

POWER  127kW at 3500 revs

TORQUE 400Nm at 2000 revs

TRANSMISSION Six-speed manual

FUEL CONSUMPTION 7.6/100km combined

CO2 EMISSIONS 202g/km

RIVALS

Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0 TDI: 80/100 (from $36,690)

Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS: 72/100 (from $35,990)

Holden Captiva 2.0 TD SX AWD: 74/100 (from $39,490)

Jeep Cherokee Sport 2.8 TD : 70/100 (from $44,490)

Kia Sorento 2.5 CRDi : 72/100 (from $35,290)

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 11 comments

  • Space saver spare is NOT an issue worth the print. Take a plug repair kit and a pump to plug into the AC socket if it causes you concern. What is really a concern and the ONLY reason I can’t consider one is lack of auto with the diesel. This immediately drops from about number 2 on my list to out of the running.

    Steveo of Stanmore Posted on 12 February 2011 7:07pm
  • They shoud make the diesel to a ZF auto box!

    Jonno of SouthCoast Posted on 28 April 2010 8:19pm
  • Sorry guys, but this whole debate about a spacesaver really makes me smile. You see for nearly 7 years while I was a State Manager travelling more than 100k in a calendar year, I was getting a 10,000km service every 6 weeks. Today I still drive over 40,000kms a year and I can not remember the last time that I ever had a flat/puncture. For me this is not an issue, and really if you have a flat tyre or a nail in your tyre, common sense suggests that you get it fixed straight away. Again, may be I am becoming an old man, but every time I walk to my car I always look at every tire and corner of the car - with my wifes car I always notice any new scracthes and dents, and there is always something new to see with her car. Anyway, back to the topic, for me this whole ‘spacesaver’ topic is a non issue - it gives some something to talk about, when there really is nothing there

    Con Verdis of ROZELLE Posted on 30 December 2009 10:02pm
  • The public or the government (via ADR rules) has to somehow get the message through to manufacturers that a space saver (read cost saving, profit booster spare) is totally inappropriate for a 4WD or long range full size family sedan like Commmodore. Just don’t buy such cars and the makers will learn!

    Ashwin Posted on 29 December 2009 9:54pm
  • The public or the government (via ADR rules) has to somehow get the message through to manufacturers that a space saver (read cost saving, profit booster spare) is totally inappropriate for a 4WD or long range full size family sedan like Commmodore. Just don’t buy such cars and the makers will learn!

    Ashwin Posted on 29 December 2009 9:52pm
  • Has everybody forgotten the fact that it still only has a ‘spacesaver’ spare?

    carath Posted on 18 December 2009 8:20am
  • Hi Mustapha, sorry but the Tiguan does not even come close. I seriously considered the VW, until I opened the tailgate. In reality the Tiguan is just a enlarged Golf. My greater concern with the Tiguan is the horror stories you hear whenever you speak to anyone about a VW, let down terribly with reliability and quality issues, and the service costs are out of control. Every Golf owner and the Tiguan owners that I know and have known, have all had to replace brakes,and machine disc’s at 30,000kms, and they all have been stung by a service costing $2 - $3,000 dollars. One of the guys that I work with has just placed an order for his diesel CX7, and he is trading is Tiguan. Again, when Mazda get their act together, add an automatic and a sunroof, then the CX7 will be a great car. As Paul wrote in his review,at the moment the CX7 diesel comes with a ‘but’. If you can live with the manual and no sunroof then, it is a great car.

    Con Verdis of ROZELLE Posted on 16 December 2009 10:48pm
  • All in all a half baked approach by Mazda,
    Diesel has no Automatic
    2.3 Turbo drinks like a V8 (more)
    2.5 Slow and booring (Drinks too)
    Servicing every 6 monts 10,000k

    In this day and age and with all the competition you need to do better, Mazda would have been better off releasing one good CX7 model that fixed all the shortfalls for what otherwise would have been a good car..

    Purchased a Tiquan instead.

    David Posted on 16 December 2009 3:27pm
  • Agree with Con, cannot believe the Diesel doesn`t have sunroof at least as option…

    MattZilla Posted on 16 December 2009 8:57am
  • Why bother? The VW Tiguan’s better…by far!

    Mustapha P of Morninton Peninsula Posted on 15 December 2009 1:33pm
  • We have now owned our diesel CX7 for almost 2 months, and we love it. Very quiet, very comfortable, and it really handles, steers and brakes very well - very Mazda zoom zoom. The CX7 has excellent quality and fit and finsih - apart from the cheap hard plastic glove box lid. Bose sound system when hooked up to my Ipod is sensational. The fuel economy is amazing for such a large car. We have driven to Canbera and Newcastle and during these trips the we used 6.2 litres per 100 km grin In everyday to day living, we manage around 7.5 - 8.2kms per 100. My wife and I love the manual gearbox, it really is easy to use, and in our car and from our experience we do not agree with Paul’s comments.Personally, I am more dissappointed at not having a sun roof in a car costing this much,and the cost of Mazda accessories is just out of control. I have ordered head light covers, bonnet protector, cargo linear and rear cargo tray - $675.00!!

    Con Verdis of ROZELLE Posted on 12 December 2009 2:54pm
Read all 11 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links