Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Land Rover: in defence of Defender

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
image It may be as basic as a caveman, but this Land Rover off-roader is all class.

There are just some things that don't change - leopards and spots, Land Rover and Defenders.

This is the modern incarnation of the Land Rover.

It boasts 50 per cent better ventilation and a new integrated dash with an upgraded sound system and new, more comfortable seating. Ergonomics is not a strong point - the Defender's cabin design has little that falls into the category, with an average driving position, oddly placed switchgear - the horn is on the end of the indicator stalk - and the door is too close. But much of that matters little if you're looking to head way off the beaten track, as this machine has all the skills without resorting to electronics.

Low-range, wheel travel and a centre diff lock allows it to climb just about any terrain at which you point its bumpy, square nose.

It all but stops on steep, tricky descents, allowing the driver to pick a perfect path downhill with ample grip from the off-road tyres.

The Defender is powered by a 2.4-litre 16-valve turbodiesel four-cylinder engine that works well with the low gearing off-road, but offers leisurely sealed-road performance. Filling the tank is also something of a low-speed thrill - the near-horizontal filler neck makes pump blow back a regular occurrence - don't even bother with a high-speed “trucker” diesel pump.

You have to admire the courage of convictions in sticking with the Defender in a form that flies in the face of modern design. While it works beautifully in serious off-road environs, many will never experience its rough-terrain abilities; they've been spoiled with modern SUVs and won't put up with the idiosyncrasies.

 


Snapshot

Land Rover Defender 130 cab-chassis

Price: $50,990.

Engine: 2.4-litre 16-valve common-rail turbodiesel four-cylinder.

Transmission: Six-speed manual.

Power: 90kW at 3500rpm.

Torque: 360Nm at 2000rpm.

Performance: 0-100km/h 15.8 seconds. Top speed 132km/h.

Fuel consumption: 11.1 litres/100km, tank capacity 75 litres.

Emissions: 295g/km.

Suspension: Live beam axle, coil springs, dampers, Panhard rod (front). Live beam axle, coil springs, dampers, A-frame, co-axial helper springs (rear).

Brakes: Front and rear discs.

Dimensions: Length 5170mm, width 1790mm, height 2021mm, wheelbase 3225mm, track fr/rr 1486/1511mm, approach/departure angles 49/35deg, ground clearance 314mm, weight 2120kg.

Wheels: 16in steel.

 

In its class:

Toyota HiLux SR 4x4 dual-cab chassis, from $40,890.

Mitsubishi Triton 4x4 GLS cab-chassis, from $51,990.

Nissan Navara D40 dual-cab ST-X, from $45,990.

Ford Ranger 4x4 XL turbodiesel crew-cab chassis, from $36,990.

Holden Rodeo 4x4 LX crew-cab chassis turbodiesel, $41,290.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 9 comments

  • Yeah rod busher im interested in your hell tough 130 how much $$$$?????? woodcuttersteve

    woodcuttersteve of ballarat Posted on 25 January 2011 9:55pm
  • It is annoying that motoring journalists always try to drag the Landrover Defender range back to the level of Japanese makes that are really just a compromise between wagon and ute. The LR Defender pretends to be nothing but a capable work horse with a tried and tested history of service to many industries. Its interior and exterior design are both practical and durable. I drive a Defender everyday weighing nearly 3 ton with tools and its ride and handling both on and offroad are far more comfortable riding on coils the any other vehicle I have driven.Its about time some motoring journos took the landrover defender range for what they are and test the other vehicle makes against the Landrover not the other way round because in the end who really wants to buy a ute that you really can’t use because you get mud on the carpet or you need a suspension kit to carry your load.

    Stephen Ringe Posted on 19 September 2010 11:08am
  • i own 2 landys 1 is a 130 with a 6.5 chev turbo 400 with maxi drives front and rear…the other is a new svx…so far i cant fault the svx ...anyone want a hell tough 130.?
    rod Fremantle

    rod busher Posted on 31 December 2009 12:16am
  • Defender vs pretender
    I’ll take the defender any time. 
    If you want something to go and drop the kids off at school take anyone of the pretenders, but if you want something that will take you places the others don’t take you take the Defender.

    Slug Burner Posted on 18 July 2008 7:48pm
  • its a shame that a japanes (copie) of a landrover couldnt design anything for themself instead wait for someone else to do all the ground work then step in,bullet proof toyotas for instant,RANGE ROVER is still the bench mark,has been since 1972,what range rover bring out bet your bottom dollar , bullet proof will bring it out the following year,every one copies from the RANGIE   LOL   regs tony

    tony andrews of kalgoorlie Posted on 15 July 2008 9:54pm
  • i love the defender,(mine is a 130) yes the doors are a little close,but thats a defender,being square you can go through the scrub and now that you will get were your going,and not worry about how far your gaurds are flared out if a tree is close to the front fender ,then you now it will pass with out hitting the vehicle,if you damage peace of the defender,get a new section and bolt that in all the other 4wd are for church goers,defender is for driving in the big paddock,not a show peace,all muscel

    tony andrews of kalgoorlie Posted on 15 July 2008 9:39pm
  • Put aside Stuart Martin’s failure to differentiate the Defender 130 cab-chassis from its electronically-enhanced wagon sibling, and what he writes is fairly close to the mark.

    There’s no excuse for the original 130, let alone its 2008 successor, having a fuel filler that doesn’t work properly, or an uncomfortable driving position.

    And what a shame that a model with the potential for the greatest off-road ability of any standard production 4WD lacks front and rear differential locks (mechanical ones rather than ABS-activated electronic traction control, which some car makers still confuse with the real thing), or at least a rear LSD.

    With only a centre diff lock that merely ensures continuous drive to at least one front and rear wheel, the Defender can be almost as helpless as a soft-roader when it eventually reaches the limit of its extraordinary suspension articulation.

    And its off-road ability isn’t matched by its durability and reliability, which trails the tough-as-old-boots Patrol by a long-shot.

    How ironic that an English icon like Land Rover has been bought by a company from one of the country’s former colonies.

    Then again, if Bentley can be owned by an outfit from a former enemy, anything’s possible ...

    'Morris Dancer' (freelance 4WD journalist) of Sydney, Australia Posted on 01 April 2008 2:42pm
  • There is a niche. They will fill it.

    For many, anything but a “proper” landy just wouldn’t do.

    Sir Osis of Liver Posted on 01 April 2008 11:12am
  • Rather a bullet proof Toyota L/C, would eat this oil-leaker and spit it out.

    “Land Rover, proudly Indian owned” LOL

    Cheers

    OttoAU Posted on 28 March 2008 4:33pm
Read all 9 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links