Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Honda Jazz supercharged review

  • By Neil Dowling
  • The Sunday Times
  • image

    Adding a supercharger to a Jazz appears like a giant overkill, like adding an instruction label to a cup, but there is method in the move.

Neil Dowling road tests and reviews a Honda Jazz that has been pepped up by Sprintex Superchargers

As a shopping trolley, the Honda Jazz got it all - looks, function, features, price and frugal manners.  But insert the word ‘performance’ into any of these descriptions and you'll erase the words that have become firmly embedded in the Honda Jazz.

Adding a supercharger to a Jazz appears like a giant overkill, like adding an instruction label to a cup, but there is method in the move.  Perth-based Sprintex Superchargers - a division of publicly-listed Automotive Technology Group Ltd - let a current-model supercharged Jazz lose in my hands this week with the clear instructions that it wasn't a high-performance machine.

Sprintex's business development manager Jay Upton says it is one of five trial cars to test the supercharger's benefits of lifting performance while lowering fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Driving

The Jazz starts like a Jazz and outwardly, the only difference is the subtle whine of the supercharger.  It feels a little more lively directly off the mark but won't reveal any power band surprises as the tacho needle hurries its way around the dial.

In fact, such is the conventional power delivery, it could just be a bigger-engined Jazz.  But it's definitely quicker, with 100kW heading towards the bitumen as compared with the standard model's 72kW - as measured by Sprintex.

What I expected, and didn't get, was a noticeable jump in torque. Given other Sprintex-equipped cars I've driven in the past, the low-end torque should bite hard and that leads to short-shifting the gearbox - which is one of the reasons for supercharged engines being so economical.

But it feels a little soft. Upton says it's a trial unit and the problem - to do with engine mapping and not the supercharger - was being addressed. 

Though there's a bit of work to do at the lower end of the rev range, there's no doubting this Jazz's strong midrange delivery.  Fifth gear can be held down to 1000rpm and the car will pull away smoothly. Corners can be taken in fourth and all this makes the drive easy and the engine similarly easy on petrol.

The trip computer shows 6.9 litres/100km which, after some heavy footwork, was pretty good.  Nothing changes inside the cabin or to the bodywork.  It's all under the bonnet where the weeny alloy-bodied supercharger sits just in front, and above, the cam cover.

It appears to be a snug fit and close to the Jazz's tiny bonnet, but the exposed drive belt shows it can easily be replaced without too much work.  Upton expects to continue to hone the unit before sales start into next year.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 4 comments

  • I have had a 2006 VTI Jazz from new. On the freeway the first 40k averaged very low 5 /100 even below 5, always well below 6.5/100, my Yaris 1.5 auto stops at around 615km per 42 litre tank, the Jazz has several times done 715km per tank, never run it dry, lately it went up to over 7/100 fuel economy but with a CVT oil change it went back down to 6.1/100, city driving is smaller trips too. Fuel is fantastic way above the Yaris which also is exceptional anyway. But you gotta look after a jazz CVT or else, 152k all i have done is tyres, 1 battery (must get Hondas computer reset when disconnect battery $66) 1 set brake pads+ CVT oil needs doing every 40k.

    Peter Herman of Perth Posted on 10 October 2011 1:54pm
  • My auto’10 1.3 Jazz, when the 42 litre tank of petrol (ULP) is full only makes 449.2KM until it was shamefully stopped in the middle of road. It is equal 9.35L/100KM. So I put 5L of E10 petrol in, but it wouldn’t start, and then I had to fill up another 5L of 95 premium petrol and it started easily. I just don’t know why! The car was new and mechanically checked when it was tripped by 7000KM. I’m so surprised someone can make whatever 6.8 or 6.9L/100km on their trip with this car.

    Mark Posted on 01 December 2010 7:11pm
  • 6.9L/100km? My auto ‘09 has averaged 6.8 for the last year with 70/30 street/freeway driving. Sounds like they still have a lot of work to do on their goal of lowering consumption.

    Phil of Perth Posted on 08 August 2010 11:42am
  • “There’s no doubting this Jazz’s strong midrange delivery.  Fifth gear can be held down to 1000rpm and the car will pull away smoothly. Corners can be taken in fourth and all this makes the drive easy and the engine similarly easy on petrol”

    Honda’s have always done this, despite their reputation for being high-rev heros… The previous gen jazz with CVT would regularly put revs down to 1300rpm even on an incline. Its just good engine management. The Euro accelerates from below 1500rpm no problems.

    Surely to get the fuel economy benefit of supercharging, they should use the smaller engine 1.3 jazz??? Ie: VW twincharger style?

    ToughLoveThomas of The Can Posted on 22 July 2010 11:16am
Read all 4 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links