Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Holden Cruze Series II: review

  • By Paul Pottinger
  • The Sunday Telegraph
  • image

    It?s really tough to see how either of the new Cruzes could better serve their intended users. Photo Gallery

Paul Pottinger road tests and reviews the Holden Cruze Series II at its Australian launch.

Holden’s first Australian-made small car in decades will challenge the Corolla and Mazda3 for popularity and rivals the Golf for sophistication and quality.  Yes, the Cruze Series II is that good. Well, the two new versions are.

Carsguide can say this after exclusive time with each of them; 200km with the 1.4iTi turbo petrol and the whole 760 kay way from Port Melbourne to Adelaide in the new 2.0-litre turbo Diesel.

The Cruze might well be less than 50 per cent a local hero in terms of components. In fact if it was edible, it would be fusion cuisine with major ingredients from Korea and engines from Austria and Italy.

Yet the Cruze works so thoroughly in the cut throat competition of small sedan and hatch segment because it’s been refined here by a local carmaker for local people. So well, in fact, that it when the hatchback comes online later this year, the Cruze will surely come to outsell the Commodore too.

VALUE

We’ll ignore the carry-over 1.8 petrol engine versions here; even Holden admit the $20,990 CD and $24,990 CDX remain mainly to provide entry price points.

Things become interesting with the new 1.4. It comes in CD trim ($22,2400), SRi ($24,490) and range topping Sri-V ($27,990). The Diesel (called just that, not another tangled acronym as with its rivals) is $24,990 (CD) and $28,490 (CDX).

A six speed auto adds $2000, “premium” paint $500.  To break that down, CDs come standard with 16-inch steel wheels, the full safety package including auto headlights, cruise control and audio buttons on the steering wheel.  CDXs add leather trim, 17-inch alloys, colour coded door handles, front fogs and somewhere to stash your shades.

The SRi is basically a CD with chrome inserts, 17s, good to grip wheel, skirts and a lip spoiler. The Sri-V gets the lot: leather-faced seats, heated front seats, keyless entry and start, integrated sat-nav, 7-inch colour LCD screen, premium sound and rear park assist. Bluetooth is optional.

These packages are to the fore of the Cruze’s crowded class. Warranty is the average three years/100,000km. Mitsubishi, Hyundai and Kia give you five.

TECHNOLOGY

There’s a distinct danger the unknowing will be out off by the numeral “1.4”. Holden, unlike Volkswagen, don’t hide the engine’s size in the badging.

Hopefully they’ll get the message out that this small turbo unit is far more efficient than some 2.0-litre petrol engines. The same Austrian-built engine that also comes later this year in the Opel Astra is good for 103kW at 4900 revs and 200Nm over a very useful 1850-4900rpm. As a six-speed manual (also sourced from the land of strudel) it's rated at 6.4 litres/100km - enough for a 1000-kilometre touring on a tank, Holden claim. The six speed auto (from Korea), with manual gate, gets 6.9-litres. Premium 95 RON is recommended.

Those figures approach those of the new Italian-made 2.0-litre turbo diesel with its 120kW and fat class-leading 360 units of torque, a unit shared with the Captiva SUV. The manual is Australia’s most economical car at 5.6L, superior to the endlessly hyped Camry Hybrid. The auto “blows out” to 6.7, but a marked improvement over the previous oiler.

The 1.4’s Watts-link rear suspension is said to be better than in terms of packaging and road noise than other multi-link set-ups. This too is part of the forthcoming Astra.

DESIGN

The Cruze sedan appeals to Commodore people who just don’t need the space or a V6 juice bill. Not only is it a four door with a boot, thus a “proper” car in their eyes, the family resemblance has been made plainer with new fascia, trapezoidal grille, wheels and headlight treatment.

Already big for a supposedly small car, these minor but telling treatments move the Cruze more obviously into the Holden, as opposed to broader GM, family. Passing any number of Korean import Cruzes on our epic trip, the difference becomes obvious.

Within, the top-spec SRi-V loses nothing to Japanese or German imports in terms of tactile comfort and finish. Though it’s easy to engage the right driving position, changing up with the notchy manual stick will bring the elbow into contact with the centre storage compartment. It’s mildly annoying.

SAFETY

It’s all there, with six airbags, stability program and anti-skid brakes accessed through a pedal that how one should be, with just enough progression before they bite. Cruze is already a five star crash safety winner. The spare is a 16-incher.

DRIVING

It’s really tough to see how either of the new Cruzes could better serve their intended users.  Here the refinement and comfort traditionally the preserve of bigger car with the efficiency of a smaller model with arguably more success than anything else to be had.

The marriage of the small turbo petrol and its “old” style torque converter auto works more smoothly than the pairing of similar engines with any twin-clutch transmission. Suppression of road noise, vibration and harshness is also class-leading – the wildly successful Mazda3 seems raucous by comparison.

Though covered with go fast kit, the new petrol engine car is decidedly not a boy racer mobile. It’s a responsive even agile performer that steers, handles and (aptly enough) cruises with complete assurance. It would seem comfortably familiar to a Golf owner, who pays more for less kit and painfully more for service and maintenance.

It’s a great pity that the Diesel with make up only 20 per cent of Cruze sales, and the manual a fraction within that. For the greater part of the time you could be unaware that this is not a petrol engine, so quiet is it on the move. Then you move to overtake and that surge of torque pours on smoothly but assertively, a process served by the clutch’s perfect take up point.

Holden’s home development work serves it well.

VERDICT

The top version of the car that will come to outsell the Commodore shows that less might not be more, but it’s more than enough.  75/100

HOLDEN CRUZE SERIES II

Price: From $22,240 (1.4); $24,990 (Diesel)
Engine: 1.4-litre turbo petrol 4-cylinder; 103kW/200Nm or 2.0-litre turbo diesel; 120kW/360Nm
Transmission: 6-speed automatic; 6-speed automatic;
Thirst: 6.9L/100km (1.4 auto); 6.7L/100km (Diesel)

RIVALS

Ford Focus (from $21,490)
Honda Civic (from $22,490)
Hyundai i30 (from $19,590)
Kia Cerato Si (from $22,490)
Mazda3 (from $21,330)
Renault Megane (from $22,990)
Skoda Octavia (from $24,990)
Subaru Impreza (from $23,490)
Toyota Corolla (from $20,990)
Volkswagen Golf (from $22,990)

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 51 comments

  • I have a Series II CDX. It has a faulty drive shaft. I had awful trouble trying to get Holden to admit there was a problem and now I’m going to have the same problem getting them to do something about it. Apparently mine is he only car with this problem! They were supposed to get back to me at the end of February to let me know what they are going to do about it, but I’ve heard nothing. Now I will have to hassle them again. The Series I Cruze apparently had this problem. I’d like to know why it wasn’t resolved before the Series II was built. I wonder how many others have this fault. I won’t buy another Holden because of the company’s terrible customer service and lack of customer support.

    Robyn Wolstenholme of Mornington Victoria Posted on 06 April 2012 11:19pm
  • Where is the Holden Cruze CD built, made and assembled? Is it Taiwan, Korea or Australia?

    Teena Posted on 04 January 2012 10:44pm
  • For years I’ve driven Holden Commodore Executive station wagons ... but now that my children have all grown up ... I decided to buy a smaller car.

    I must admit that I’m not a car expert, I just wanted a comfortable car to drive and importantly, one that is safe, fuel efficient, environmentally friendly and NOT one that is like a shoe box with no ‘umph’.

    Initially, I immediately wanted to buy another Holden as I’ve always found them to be comfortable and reliable ... but my wife convinced me to test drive a Mazda 3 and a Ford Focus.

    And I must admit, both of the above cars were quite nice to drive and spacious. BUT ... the car I eventually decided to buy was a Series II, CD 2.0 diesel Cruze.

    I was tempted by the alloy wheels, heated front seats and reverse parking sensor of the CDX version ... but decided to buy the cheaper CD diesel instead and use the saved money on a holiday.

    I had the option of 3yrs Extended Manufacturer’s Warranty ... but turned it down ... was this a good thing that I did?

    I love the car ... it feels quite big ... and the engine is smooth, quite and has ‘umph’ even though it’s a 2.0 four cylinder. SO HAPPY with this car!!!

    Carlos Mattheos of Adelaide Posted on 31 December 2011 12:49am
  • I took the sri for a test drive this particular one was lowered and had 18 inch wheels, I found it very comfortable as soon as I got in and such a dream to drive, so impressed I have ordered the sri v in hot red. Just waiting for my car to be built and delivered they tell me i’ll get it late November…. The old vt is being sold to my nephew as a learners car and I get the cruze by salary sacrificing and novated leasing through my employer.

    Richard of Redbank qld Posted on 21 October 2011 2:49am
  • Technically in Australia (for no good reason) cars like the Polo fit into another class called the ‘light’ class. The small class is for cars like the Golf, Mazda3, Lancer, i30, etc. While the Cruze is fairly large compared to most of these (certainly bigger than a Golf), it is the same size as a Mazda3 sedan (give or take a few mm) and it is significantly smaller than medium class cars like the Mondeo, Mazda6, Toyota Camry, and so forth. In other words, it is much smaller than the average medium car than it is larger than the average small car.

    Steve Garrad of Brisbane Posted on 17 August 2011 10:54am
  • They’re anything but a “small” car. Why don’t they call it a medium car? I mean compared to my VW Polo GTi the Cruze is a bloody barge to drive.

    Chris Gordon of Melbourne Posted on 17 August 2011 8:28am
  • Am test driving the 1.8 litre auto series II. It’s a bit saggy and jerky with its changing. Like the car though. I tried the manual iti 1.4 a while ago. It seemed just fine-think I like it better. Need to try the diesel-manual and auto…......has heaps of extras for the price and seems well made, but then I am a Holden girl….......don’t like cars that fall apart after a couple of years…....

    Gladcam of of North east Victoria Posted on 25 July 2011 11:34pm
  • Btrlow of Yamba does have a point,75/100 but no negative as to why.The cruze ii is a peppy little machine ideal for around town to medium distance driving, I wouldn’t drive the supposed 1000km per tank in one go, for fear causing a terminal issue in the turbo under sustained revs. let’s face it korean parts are not known for quality or duration. The amount of tech lines that are updated regularly gives me some concern albeit they are minor issues, fixed free.I will still buy a cdx for my wife its not all that bad as long as its a 2.0l diesel preferably manual…best to drive and try for yourself.

    testdrive of Ballina Posted on 05 July 2011 12:38pm
  • I have also driven all of the cars mentioned above, the focus was nice to drive but every thing about it felt cheap !! The Volkswagen golf was probably the nicest to drive but you are paying for it! And I have driven all of the cruze’s my verdict is the old 1.8L cruze is rubbish, the old 2.0L TD was noisy and jerky at best, now the series 2 cruze’s the 1.8L still gutless but good value for a nanna, the 1.4L Tp better than the 1.8L by a long shot!! The 2.0L TD CDX was the best out of all the cars mentioned in the means of value for money and to drive is by far the best also, also to the comment left By btrlow you should really go take it for a test and actually read the reviews lol it clearly states the only small car made here and clearly does not hide the fact most parts are imported, the other cars you mentioned are completely terrible cars to drive the lancer lol cooler cars now that’s just funny, I have driven all cars mentioned and I ordered the CDX 2.0L TDI CRUZE

    PM of Townsville QLD Posted on 01 July 2011 5:32am
  • I test drove one today and all you knockers can go jump in the lake. It was a fabulously fun car to drive. Heaps of room, pleanty of power and great value for money. I am nearly 6’ tall and could fit in behind the steering wheel with ease. The boot is enormous and road noise is non existent. Everybody embraced the Gemini when it first came to Australia, it was put together here, thats all. Just like the Cruz. Good on you Holden for having a go. I don’t see any other “Australian” manufacturers having a go! Ford, one day, wont even be building the Falcon here. Just wait and see.

    Dave of Dapto Posted on 13 May 2011 1:49pm
  • Pathetic - only saying good things about it - you were paid off by Holden it seems - not faulting it ? sus. By the way, the Focus looks better, drives better and regardless to economy, a much cooler, more fun car to drive. Same goes with Golf and Lancer. They say it is the first Aussie made car (Falcon, Commodore, hello) but components come from Korea, Austria and numerous other countries, so together does not make it pure Aussie made. Series One was poor at best Korean made crap and can have no comparison to V6 or V8 while towing. Are you kidding ? Cruze TD Series 1 ? It has a V8 like performance, Gerry of Wishart, Qld ? sure, ha, not even close. This is still part Korean, part Austrian, so still no different to the other brands? being parts sourced overseas and built overseas. The turbo 1.4 and TD 2 are an improvement but looks and comfort and interior quality will still lack Aussie feel. It still looks Korean, still boring, only the economy makes it a little better, Focus, Golf, Lancer, Mazda 3, Opel, Astra, Corolla, Civic and the rest look just as good or better similar packages, options, drivability, a lot to choose from. Shop around, test drive yourself, don?t just fall for the false gimmick.

    btrlow of Yamba NSW Posted on 12 May 2011 11:56am
  • MotorMouth sells holdens for a living so he has knowledge that he uses to his advantage. Telling us all the good things (some things are completely made up) and hides the many shortcomings of the cruze.

    John Baxter of Kariong Posted on 01 May 2011 12:57am
  • I can’t wait for the Cruze 1.6L turbo with 6 speed manual.

    Rowan of Sydney Posted on 29 April 2011 12:24pm
  • Dieselauto, you would probably find that if neglect to service any car on time is found to have caused an engine failure than any manufacture would have denied the warranty claim.

    jason of melb Posted on 18 April 2011 4:08pm
  • I’m all for looking at Aussie made vehicles, BUT… The problem is be very careful with servicing your holden, as if the motor breaks while under warranty, if your late on servicing they’ll wipe there hands of you. Happened to a good friend of mine.

    & Ford need to reconsider a smaller vehicle built here. Start with dropping the turbo diesel and 6spd auto in all falcons for same cost. I’d probably buy one tomorrow if they did.  (and Toyota as well- do they still make the Aurion? lol)

    DieselAuto in future of Sydney Posted on 14 April 2011 5:07pm
  • Having owned a 2010 Cruze since late July last year, I honestly don’t have too many complaints about it. Yes, the 1.8L engine isn’t as powerful as I’d like but for everyday driving (and I live in a hilly area), it’s perfectly fine. The new 1.4iTi should go some way to improving performance.

    My TCM was faulty and was draining my battery constantly. Holden replaced it under warranty and I got a further 3yrs from the dealer making it 6yrs (they really should advertise that more).

    Late last year, my best friend bought a Ford Focus. Nothing wrong with that car (it’s the South African built model). Has more grunt than my Cruze for sure but still admits that the Cruze looks better. They’re different cars for different purposes.

    I’d be interested to see how well the Series 2 Cruze does, particularly since my Dad has always like the styling of the Commodores. The Cruze meets his needs more and if the 1.4iTi is as good as we hope, it’ll be the right car for him.

    Ryan of Brisbane Posted on 10 April 2011 9:45pm
  • I’m guessing (without looking at the car itself but having read the specs) that they’ve again decided NOT to put in a driver’s footrest.  This was part of the deal clincher (apart from the whiny auto engine in the 1.8) that stopped me getting a Cruze.

    Can someone give me an idea if I’m right ?

    Paul of Melbourne Posted on 05 April 2011 4:16pm
  • I have taken a series one for a test drive and I can not fault them against the competitors. Self indulgent nit pickers talk nonsense to support their own idea of being special.  Every Australian that works on these cars will pay tax that will be used to pay people like doctors and nurses in hospitals that might save your families life. Anyone that is in a job paid for by taxpayers should support this vehicle over its direct rivals.  Mate, Aussies are kind hearted and will support our economy and car industry not overseas economies so they can feel special based on a small detail.

    Aussie of Australia Posted on 04 April 2011 12:13pm
  • The warranty on the Cruze is actually sometimes 6 years if you have it serviced from the dealership.

    Gwendolynn of LovelyAustralia Posted on 04 April 2011 11:55am
  • Brian Baxter, I have a German car and have owned many Commodores. I live in the country and the Commodore (I still own 1) is better on the Aussie roads, costs only 2-3l/100km more to run (with 4 extra litres of capacity, yup V8) and collectively my last 4 Commodores (over 10 years) have just barely cost me the same to maintain and run as the German designed car I’ve owned for 5 years. It’s a 2003 model too (Astra SRi Turbo for the record). I used to buy the German engineering spiel but experience has shown me Aussie cars for Aussie highways and roads. The seat heaters are nice I admit but the design of the seats are very hot in summer. The Calais’ seats are not. Why? Because they’re designed to be driven in our wide brown land. Buzzing around sunny Melbourne may be different but to drive in Australia (not another city clone) the Commodore is way better.

    Gerry, I agree with your condenser comment but V8 like performance from a 4cyl diesel? Is the V8 in question a Holden 253? Times have changed a little, I recommend you take a V8 SS/Calais for a test drive. Can I offer you a job selling ice to eskimos? The new Cruze looks good.

    Adam of Country SA Posted on 01 April 2011 10:05am
  • Janene Tessari complains that a stone damaged her A/C condenser. This can happen to any car and is not a manufacturing defect and GM cannot be held responsible. She should make a claim under her insurance. She says that she is happy with her Cruze but wouldn’t recommend one to anybody else. This makes no sense whatsoever. I purchased a Series 1 CD Cruze diesel auto (with tow bar) in August 2010 and couldn’t be happier with the car. It has a V8 like performance (I have had many V8s in the past) but has terrific fuel economy, much better than my wife’s 1600 auto Corolla. Phil byrne asks how the diesel auto Cruze goes towing. I regularly tow a fairly heavy trailer (7 foot x 4 foot 6 inches) and the Cruze handles it without fuss. Still good performance and towing economy is still better than the Corolla which couldn’t pull the skin off a rice pudding. I have had no troubles whatsoever with the car so far and am completely happy with it and would recommend it to anybody. Those poor souls who make rubbish comments have obviously never driven one, but then again they are so clever, they don’t need to to form their one eyed opions.

    Gerry of Wishart, Qld. Posted on 30 March 2011 9:47am
  • Lancer Fan

    Good point about that warranty, which is why we mention it all the time, as you’ll see from various reviews. It makes the Lancer a great ownership proposition. The onus is on other carmakers to match the five year coverage given by Mitsubishi, Hyundai and Kia.

    Paul Pottinger Posted on 26 March 2011 8:32pm
  • Is this site against the Mitsubishi Lancer? I constantly read reviews on cars in the same category and it always seems to be discarded. In the list of rivals it doesn’t list the Lancer which is a great car. When i bought mine it was the best spec’d of the lot. They should mention too that as well as having a great 5 yr warranty, there is also a 10yr drivetrain warranty.

    Lancer Fan of Brisbane Posted on 25 March 2011 12:22pm
  • I bought a TV 3 years ago. i get support by making a phone call. as for hands on no nothing. but unless the thing dies what support should i get ?. try a ford customer support, apparently they have one?.

    I’d take a diesel one in a heart beat. and from what i read they almost suggest it’s build quality refinement is better over the series 1. which is to be expected get rid of the wobbles from the previous series. i must admit this is something Holden/Ford do well.

    Richard Kane Smith of Victoria Posted on 24 March 2011 8:25pm
  • Dean T
    Not at all. I welcome a frank exchange of views. That’s what this site is all about. But if anyone slings off for the sake of it, I sling back.
    Leading up to the Cruze drive I made a point of driving a Mazda3, Golf 77TSI and Lancer VRX. In the US I drove the new Ford Focus (which gets here later this year). In the recent past I’ve driven the others listed here.
    Smacks of Holden PR, you say? What can I tell you? I call ‘em like I see ‘em. I wasn’t expecting much. I was surprised. Ask Holden what they think of my previous reviews and blogs.
    Cheers
    - PP

    Paul Pottinger Posted on 24 March 2011 6:11pm
  • I bought a Holden Cruze in July 2010 and before I even got to use the airconditioner once the condenser which is at the front of the car was damaged because a rock got in through the very wide gaps on the grill.  I feel that Holden have all but admitted to the design fault with the new mesh grill on this improved model, especially by advertising they can take if off road and all.  Obviously there have been many complaints for them to realise this change was important, but ask Holden what they are doing to help those of us that have bought the previous model.  Absolutely nothing!!!!!!  I love my Holden Cruze but could not recommend anyone buy a Holden because their support to you after the purchase is zero.

    Janene Tessari of Monegeetta Posted on 24 March 2011 1:30pm
  • What’s the matter Paul Pottinger, can’t you handle a little bit of criticism? I have to agree with Rick, after reading this piece it does smell a little bit of Holden PR spin. You say to do a back to back test, well maybe you should have done that too before ‘comparing’ the Cruze with other cars in the class!

    Dean T of Sunbury Posted on 24 March 2011 10:13am
  • Rick - Drive it against everything in the class then get back to me. Until then, you can spell your name with a silent “P”.

    Martin Hayden - Don’t be too quick to think the 1.4 turbo is underdone. It has more torque than the 1.8 atmo Cruze and the 2.0-litre N/A engines from Mazda2 and Impreza RS.
    But you’re right - the perception of too small a capacity will cost them. And I too prefer the diesel.

    Cheers

    - PP

    Paul Pottinger of Sydney Posted on 23 March 2011 3:10pm
  • That 1.4 turbo petrol engine is not good enough. A N/A 2L petrol engine of around 120/130KW with good torque is what is required. Surely GM can do better than this, (once again underpowered petrol engine) which WILL cost them sales. The diesel looks the goods though. Pickles.

    Martin Hayden of Australia Posted on 23 March 2011 10:45am
  • And now folks, a completely unbiased review of the new Holden Cruze, brought to you by our sponsor - GM-Holden.

    Rick of saudi arabia Posted on 22 March 2011 4:50pm
  • Flix Swiss of Melbourne: Do you have comprehension difficulties, mate? Do you need it spelled out for for you in tiny words? If anything I go on and on about the Cruze’s international heritage. And no, nobody remembers “VWs assembled in Clayton”, because they are irrelevant to this discussion. Like you. If you’ve nothing worth saying go on the Drive site.

    Paul Pottinger Posted on 22 March 2011 11:15am
  • Real Shak, my blinkers shield me from conjecture and inaccuracy. I only see the facts. The current Opel Astra has exactly the same Watts link suspension used in turbo Cruzes. Do a minute’s research, Google “Opel Astra watts link”, and you’ll see. The last Astra sold here had a torsion beam set-up (I owned one). If you search for “GM Delta II platform” you will see it underpins both Astra and Cruze.
    So if you want something that might be better to drive - there are plenty of great hot hatches with torsion beam rear-ends, Megane RS250 being the most obvious - you can opt for it in Cruze. If you wait for Opel to arrive with the current Astra, you won’t get any chassis advantage from it at all. It will look nicer, it will probably feel more upmarket, and the price will reflect all that, but it won’t handle any better.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 21 March 2011 11:46am
  • @motormouth Astra = independent rear suspension. Cruze = Beam axle or watts link?? Talk about 80’s tech. Def not the same platform and def not in the same league. You should take your Holden blinkers off

    Real Shak of The Shack Posted on 21 March 2011 10:34am
  • anybody towed with Cruze if so what & where, what was economy like. Specifically the diesel auto.

    phil byrne of south aust Posted on 20 March 2011 7:15pm
  • Hey Motormouth: Thank you, sir.

    Richard: Got to say we had no hassles with the instruments, and this was in blinding sunlight. The new diesel pulled really evenly off the mark. But we’ve yet to try it with an auto. Lag could be a factor there. Will say the turbo petrol needs more of boot off the mark, but the small capacity pays for itself at the pump.

    Brian Baxter: The new Focus (here later this year) is highly impressive. Going to make for a fascinating comparo.

    Shebs: You’re right, the real test is always long-term ownership, but all I can tell you is over a 1000km testing various Cruzes, it looked and felt a quality bit of kit.

    Cheers to all

    PP

    Paul Pottinger of Sydney Posted on 20 March 2011 12:52pm
  • Gary, a two year old Camry would also cost as much as a Cruze (20-25 grand for one with 30,000km or less on it, 16 to 18 grand will get you something with 70-100,000km), yet be second-hand. i.e. Less than a year left on warranty. It is also far less attractive, would definitely not be as good to drive, has no power to weight advantage, uses a lot more fuel and probably isn’t as well equipped for similar price. Cruze is not the kind of car I buy but if it were, I would definitely take it over a someone else’s discarded Camry. In fact, I think I’d rather take the bus than drive a Camry.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 20 March 2011 11:11am
  • The Cruze should not be compared with small hatchbacks, like the Golf or Hyundai i30. At more than 4.6m long, it is only a couple of inches shorter than the original VB Commodore. As a sedan, it would be more meaningful to compare it with other medium sized cars like the Mazda 6 or Skoda Octavia.

    Des of Melbourne Posted on 20 March 2011 10:02am
  • Typical Paul Pottinger rave, a lot of hot air about nothing. Australien made?  Localy assembled from from bits and pieces all over the World !!.  Remembert the assembled VW’s from Clyaton, the Renold’s from Heidelberg nobody wanted?

    Flix Swiss of Melbourne Posted on 19 March 2011 12:24am
  • Hey Brian, all Australian delivered Focus are made in South Africa, untouched by any European hands. Not for long though, the new one will be built in Thailand, a country with an even poorer automotive history. Given those choices, I think most people would prefer Australian made, don’t you?

    Rowan, I don’t think GM bother with the 2.2 any more. I had a 2.2. Astra but it was discontinued after only a year or so. Interestingly, I now own an Alfa with basically the same engine, from the same factory in Hungary. Alfa use their own heads and injectors and the difference is night and day - where the Astra would run out of puff at around 6000, the Alfa screams all the way to the 7000rpm cut-out. If GM could get their 2.2 to perform like that, I’d buy any car from them with it.

    Real Shak, there is no Daewoo at all in Cruze. It is built on the same Opel engineered platform as Astra. It just wears different body panels and a cheaper interior. Mechanically they are very close to equal. With so much input from Holden, I would expect Cruze to be a better bet for our conditions than Astra.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 18 March 2011 10:36pm
  • Second hand camry(one or two years,about 30000km,just cost 16000-18000)would better can this one??

    gary Posted on 18 March 2011 4:22pm
  • Brian Baxter, you’re a real patriot. If Australian hands offend you why don’t elope to Europe with your beloved Focus. You won’t have trouble finding one at your local Ford dealer, they can’t get rid off them if their dismal sales figures are anything to go by.

    Jim C of Sydney Posted on 17 March 2011 9:39pm
  • What about the unreadable instruments during the day, due to windscreen reflection, and the awful turbo lag of its predecessor?

    Richard of Bowral Posted on 17 March 2011 7:36pm
  • Reality Check, it was actually Paul who said he’d buy 43 Golf GTIs if he had a million dollars to spend on cars, so for him to compare Cruze favourably against the Golf says volumes about how good it is. When you look at what’s on offer, I have no trouble at all believing what he has written. Up to now, small capacity turbos have been the exclusive province of premium European offerings. For Holden to be offering one at the business end of the small car segment is nothing short of amazing and really sticks it to the Japanese brands, who cling to 1990’s tech in order to be price-competitive.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 17 March 2011 5:58pm
  • Reality check

    So it’s you who reads The Age? I wondered who it was. I usually wait to see their stuff on Media Watch.
    You should read more widely. Do so and you’ll see that by no means do I always have positive things to say about Holden. Or Ford.

    Paul Pottinger Posted on 17 March 2011 5:15pm
  • Good stuff, but dont’ have much faith in Aussie made period.  Costs go up, quality goes down.

    non aussie of melb of melb Posted on 17 March 2011 4:01pm
  • Paul Pottinger do you work for GM ?  I have just read the AGE review of the same vehicle , indeed I find it hard to believe it’s the same vehicle been tested.

    Reality check of Melb Posted on 17 March 2011 3:01pm
  • You can put 25% locally made lipstick on a pig and its still a Daewoo. Go Holden…

    Real Shak of The Shack Posted on 17 March 2011 11:52am
  • Brian - if the Focus is so much better, why don’t they sell any. Long live Australian made !

    Aussie of Melbourne Posted on 17 March 2011 11:31am
  • What about the 2.2L four cylinder petrol engine, with 6 speed manual? I have heard that a 1.6L turbo is also on the cards….?

    Rowan of Sydney Posted on 16 March 2011 10:03pm
  • Personally, if I were to choose this car, I would be a diesel manual customer anyway. That said, I would have to test it against the opposition, of which there is rather a lot. I will definitely give it a go, and see what develops. 120kw/360Nm for a small-medium car is plenty for me anyway. I just hope the quality is as good as indicated here.

    shebs Posted on 16 March 2011 9:01pm
  • Think that should be from $21,490 for the much better Ford Focus. The whole car comes out of Europe. German designed. Not an Australian hand touches them. Thank God.

    Brian Baxter of Brisbane. Posted on 16 March 2011 6:53pm
Read all 51 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links