Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

First drive: 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero

  • By Neil Dowling
  • The Sunday Times
image Two new models soon join Mitsubishi's Pajero line up, taking to five its variants. Photo Gallery

Mitsubishi puts more spark into sagging Pajero sales.

An exodus of interest in 4WDs hasn't dented optimism by one of its biggest players.

Two new models soon join Mitsubishi's Pajero line up, taking to five its variants.

Adding the two — an entry-level GL and more upspec `family oriented' GLS — arms buyers with a broader financial brush to get into a new Pajero.

But more specifically, it aligns Mitsubishi's Pajero range exactly with that of its main competitor, the Totota Prado.

Now in its last rendering before the entirely new 2010 version, the refreshed Pajero predictably gets more features, more safety, more power, more fuel efficiency and more visual appeal.

It also gets more expensive and that pain may even continue next year if the currency exchange gap widens between the sagging Aussie dollar and the yen.

Adding more Pajero models follows the saturation philosophy of Lancer — there's now 11 versions to choose from — and Triton with 21.

Mitsubishi admits 4WDs aren't a growing market sector. If they were a vegetable, they'd probably be dug in to improve the soil for a new type.

Since 1997 when soft-roaders appeared, 4WDs have been treading water in a tempestuous ocean of booming sales as buyers turned away from their high fuel consumption and unfriendly city size.

But Mitsubishi isn't giving up.

It has resurrected the entry-level GL version for fleet and purpose-use private buyers. It's no stripped out wagon, with standard dual airbags, ABS, traction control and the excellent electronic stability control.

Models and pricing

A GL turbo-diesel auto costs $50,790.

Move up one notch to the GLX ($55,790) and, above that, the other new entry, the GLS ($59,790).

Mr Pitman expects the GLS to appeal to families thanks to a comprehensive feature and safety list including six airbags, rear airconditioner, side steps, alloy wheels and seven seats.

`This is the area where Prado sells 70 per cent of its range,” he said,” so this is the sector we are targeting.”

Further up the price and feature ladder is the existing VRX ($66,490) and Exceed ($74,790).

Mitsubishi has already raised prices by 3 per cent and hints at the possibility of another hike next year. Toyota prices rise 2.8 per cent from January.

Drivetrains

The biggest change to the new fleet is a upgraded 3.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine boasting 18 per cent more power and torque, faster acceleration, quieter running and better fuel economy.

A new cylinder head and a variable-geometry turbocharger combine with an Aisin five-speed auto option are responsible for the the improvements.

The turbo-diesel claims an 8.7 per cent rise in fuel efficiency compared with the previous Pajero, now averaging 9.2 litres/100km.

An optional manual transmission, potentially specced for the GL version, will bring that down to 8.4 litres/100km.

Mitsubishi's product manager Tomm Pitman said that wasn't far off the 2-litre Lancer sedan's 7.6 l/100km, pouring cold water on buyers fears of big fuel thirst in some family-sized 4WDs.

While making the Pajero more frugal and nimble — it will run 0-100km/h in a respectable 11.3 seconds — there has also been a rise in towing capacity.

It will pull 3000kg — up 500kg on the previous model — and a ball download weight of 180kg. With a weight-balanced hitch, that is sufficient for a big range of caravans and boats.

“Overall, it's a better, a more refined package,” said Mr Pitman.

”The VRX has been up-specced and the GLS will fill the gap.

“There was a big step up to Exceed so the VRX will shorten that difference. Hence the price alterations.”

Sales

Mitsubishi expects small volumes of its GL — which is diesel only — and bigger interest in diesels.

Mr Pitman said that diesel accounted for 45 per cent of sales three years ago. It's now 70 per cent.

Total sales are expected to be 5000 for calendar 2009 — the new Pajero is officially launched on Boxing Day — which will be down from this year's 6000 units. Blame it on the economy.

For those interested in petrols, the 3.8-litre V6 engine hasn't been forgotten though also hasn't been altered for the new model.

Mitsubishi made similar upgrades in features to its short wheelbase Pajeros, the R and X, which are only available with automatic transmissions. For full drive impressions, see News Limited papers in coming days.

Price: from $50,790

Engine: 3.2-litre, 4-cyl, turbocharger, intercooler

Power: 147kW @ 3800rpm

Torque: 441Nm @ 2000rpm

0-100km/h: 11.3 seconds

Economy (official): 8.4 litres/100km (manual); 9.2 l/100km (auto)

Transmission: 5-speed manual or 5-speed auto, sequential; 2-speed transfer case; part-time 4WD

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 24 comments

  • I agree with every word of John Mcguiness I likewise traded up and have the same complaints. I would have my old Pajero back at the drop of a hat. The engine oil cost $130 for a service. Tappet adjust service is required at 40,000 km at a service cost exceeding $1200. The motor has huge turbo lag and is a piece of junk.

    Marko Grupetto Posted on 17 March 2012 4:02pm
  • I had a 2004 Diesel Pajero and had no complaints or trouble with the vehicle and motor. I have now had the 2009 model for a while now. The body and fittings are fine but I am really disappointed with the new motor. No doubt it has more torque for towing however the turbo lag is massive. The engineers have tweaked the motor and turbo for fuel economy at the expense of drivability and no nonsense toughness. The valve clearance has to be adjusted too often at a huge cost. It is a very fragile motor requiring regular expensive maintenance to maintain the warranty. The tough stock horse of the past has been replaced by a fragile show pony. Think twice because of the maintenance costs.

    John McGuinness Posted on 02 November 2011 9:51am
  • I learned my lesson the hard way and traded the gas guzzling 2009 petrol for a frugal DID. The difference in economy was spectacular. We love the vehicle and will take it off road for the first time on way to Cape York.

    Deon Irving of kingscliff nsw Posted on 12 September 2010 9:53pm
  • Deon Irving above mentioned a poor fuel economy figure of 20 litres per 100 kms. I hope his mechanics re-adjusted the fuel calibration after the run-in period.  It seems they haven’t.  I don’t get that poor economy even when towing my 2-tonne boat.  Yes, still have my 1999 3.5L petrol Pajero which hasn’t let me down yet, except for slight overheating if I don’t keep the radiator flushings up to it.

    Keith Range of Sydney NSW Posted on 29 July 2010 10:34pm
  • Pajero has proved itself in the Arab Gulf Countries. It is extremely reliable, no problems for years! Unlike American or German cars that require you to be regular customer of dealer/workshop. This car is really incredible! Here, it is known to be the car for harsh use, with no complaints!

    Ali Hussain of Saudi arab Posted on 23 June 2010 6:45pm
  • Great in Sand, a measure of a 4wd is not it’s ability in the sand, any vehicle with 4wd could navigate sand. The Pajero is a useless waste of money car and would not buy one if they pointed a gun at my mothers head. anyone who says they are the best have obviously not driven anything else. Get a life and buy a real 4wd!

    WTF Posted on 09 May 2010 6:35pm
  • I have learned the 2009 November release Pajero NS will require 35,000 KM manual inlet valve adjustment.  That will require removal of induction gear to be able to lift off the rockerbox. A cost of at least $300.00 for that work including materials.  If your Paj is on gas make certain the LPG installer leaves enough pipe length for that work to be performed or you will be up for further costs at that service.

    Willy Wakker of Melbourne Posted on 11 January 2010 1:53pm
  • Can someone please advise when the new 2010 Pajero will be available in OZ ?..Thanks

    Wilko Posted on 12 November 2009 2:00pm
  • Traded the Toyota for a 2007 Exceed. The difference is chalk and cheese, the pajero pulls better and got 15.9 l/100 km towing a 2000 kg boat

    David Ryan of Melb Posted on 29 October 2009 11:02am
  • 13-5-2009
    TODAY I WENT TO ALLAN MANCE IN FOOTSCRAY TO BUY A NEW PAJERO SHORT WHEEL BASE I WAITED FOR SOME ONE TO EVEN LOOK AT ME BUT FELT I WAS INVISIBLE WALKED OUT AND WENT TO ANOTHER DEALER WHO COULD AT LEAST SEE ME.

    JOHN BORG of victoria Posted on 13 May 2009 8:07pm
  • owned landcruiser,s now how a pajero(vrx diesel) the diffrence is like going from a harly to a bmw from good to better will try a disco next

    vrx of Australia Posted on 18 April 2009 12:14am
  • mitsis are a great car just make sure you dont make the mistake i did and buy from portside mitsubishi angle park, being female i found a lovely little shiny thing and handed over my $15,000, 8 weeks later i go for my 45,000km major service i let them know the tire went flat the day after i got it there were rips in the two frount tires it was majorly pulling to the left so i put new tires on it got a balence and didnt complain about the breaks shuttering every time i used them well they told me i had to pay nearly 300 dollars to fix thir mistake the breaks when i told them how have i worn the breaks in 8 weeks to that point i was then told that it was my fault they take nop responsibility and a “normal person” would accept this and pay the money like a good little girl. my ass!!! dont get caught by this dealer

    simone negus of adelaide Posted on 07 April 2009 7:38pm
  • The fuel economy does not settle down, I to only manage 18L/100kms - its now on gas and now it costs the same as a small car to run. The cost I will make back after 20000kms = $2500.00 out of my pocket. Its great to drive and loves the sand, I am a ex Nissan and Toyota driver. The safety is worth the cost over Nissan and Toyota.

    Anthony Hockey of Sydney Posted on 01 April 2009 9:08am
  • I have a 1999 NL Pajero 3.5L V6 petrol automatic (140kW, 290Nm) to tow a 2-tonne boat, which it does with reasonable ease (although thirsty) with one exception, the Mt Ousley hill out of Wollongong. Have a bit of trouble getting above second gear all the way up it and the poor engine revs its head off.  The main problem I had with this car was with the radiator.  The car did not exactly overheat, just got very hot when towing anywhere. The radiator just doesn’t seem to have a large enough header tank and there doesn’t seem to be a better option for this model.  To fix the overheating problem I basically have to strip the top and bottom tanks off the radiator core, clean everything out and refit it at the same intervals as a radiator flush is due.  Expensive option, but works as it no longer overheats.  I’m really looking to purchasing the new diesel NT Pajero sometime this year (2009) and I’m hoping the radiator will cope with my towing loads. 

    Re Dion Irving’s comment hereabouts, I get between 15 & 16 L/100kms around town (checked several fills against Odo trip meter) and on my occasional trips from Sydney to Canberra on the Hume highway (no towing involved) I get 11.1 L/100 kms. That’s not bad for a big, petrol-engined, old automatic 4WD.

    Keith Range of Sydney Posted on 28 February 2009 2:49pm
  • Reading some of the feedback, there is still an awful lot of ‘Sids-I’m a Cruiser man’ out there. Do yourselves a favour and take the blinkers off and drive a Pajero - not just around the block, you will be surprised and enlightened.

    david blackburn of Echuca Posted on 18 January 2009 12:34am
  • I don’t mind the Pajero but my sister and her partner had one only 2 or so years ago and vouched they will never buy another.

    I like the new model and the specs look good but i much prefer to drive away in a Prado instead. Not only is the build quality, reliability and dependability of the Prado arguably best in class but are excellant off-road vehicles. And they don’t look half-bad either. 

    Looking forward to the next generation Prado that’s for sure.

    Mikka of Central Queensland Posted on 06 January 2009 10:52am
  • bought the 2008 pajero recently v6.  big mistake. driving around town watching my acceleration i can bearly keep it under 20l/100k/m. a neighbour has the same prob.  do these things settle down.

    deon irving of kingscliff Posted on 31 December 2008 3:28pm
  • “...Totota Prado ...”?!

    'Morris Dancer' (freelance 4WD journalist) of Sydney, Australia Posted on 28 December 2008 1:15am
  • When are they going to give Pajero enough wheel travel, suspension flex and strength to be a viable off road alternative to the Patrol and the Cruiser in the mountains?  They are great in the sand though…

    David of Albury, NSW Posted on 24 December 2008 1:02pm
  • Pajero is still arguably one of the worlds finest 4WD’s , like it or lump it , thats a fact to those whom are in denial.

    steven A of sydney Posted on 23 December 2008 11:18pm
  • Buy last year’s model - only a trainspotter will know the difference…

    Corey of Bris Posted on 23 December 2008 10:09pm
  • Since 92 we have had 7 pajeros 2 at a time to drive. We were intending to change over 1 last year but decided the new model was far below scratch with most exceed items. The colours,dash,shape trims and especially the cost far exceeded our expectations. We now have decided that the new one is expensive for its quality and looks and have held onto both our previous models. I made a list of poor changes and the list hit the floor. Sorry Mitsubishi I never thought you would loose your touch with all parts of the general public and business peoples expectations.

    russ robinson of melbourne Posted on 23 December 2008 7:34pm
  • Being the proud owner of a 21st anniversary model with DID auto which is an exceptional package and used to tow a 2 tonne caravan, I am looking to upgrade in the not too distant future.  The power and talk figures are definetly good as these are almost the same as I am looking at with a Steinbauer power module.
    I just have to ask though,
    1.  What happened to the reputed 3litre V6 turbo diesel with 500+nm which I have been reading about.  Do we have to wait until 2010 for that.
    2.  It is good that they incresaed the towing capacity to 3 tonne ( a distint advantage over Prado), but having reduced the towball download to 180kilograms will limit the increase in towing abilities.

    Peter Paynting of Emu Plains Posted on 23 December 2008 4:50pm
  • Gee its so different to the last model isnt it….....not.
    Boring!

    Dean of Perth Posted on 22 December 2008 6:24pm
Read all 24 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links