Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Citroen C4: rival to Ford and Holden?

  • By Stuart Innes
  • The Advertiser
image Citroen C4 may be a small car but petrol-wise it is superb averaging 6.5 litres/100km, even in suburban traffic.

For about the same price as a big Aussie-made six-cylinder, Citroen's C4 is an attractive alternative.

It's doubtful if a car buyer looking at a new Holden Commodore or Ford Falcon would contemplate putting Citroen C4 on the list. Until now.

The sales figures show the swing from large cars with their petrol-guzzling six-cylinder engines to small-medium cars with four-cylinder engines.

Allied to that is the rise in model choice and sales of diesel-engine cars.

It's an interesting study to ponder that the Holden Commodore, for years (until now) Australia's biggest-selling car, starts at $36,790 for the Omega. It's Aussie rival, the new Ford Falcon, starts at $36,490.

Undercutting both is the Citroen C4 2.0 HDi, a small-medium hatchback from France at $35,990. It has everything most drivers would want - dual-zone climate control, power windows, electric folding door mirrors, cruise control, rain-sensing wipers, auto headlights, stability control, front, side and curtain airbags, trip computer, fog lights, split-fold rear seat and alloy wheels.

The Commodore Omega or Falcon XT can not match the C4's six-speed sequential shift automatic, either.

Sure, the C4 is a smaller car than the big Aussies, particularly in back-seat width. But isn't it smaller cars people are wanting now? The C4 has been out for a few years and has engines including 1.6-litre and two-litre petrol units, and a 1.6-litre diesel, but this latest two-litre diesel is a beauty.

It's smooth and torquey and matches well with the transmission. Its 100kW of power is no match against the big sixes. But it's no slug either.

And, once rolling, the 320Nm of torque at a gentle 2000rpm has an overboost facility to 340Nm for periods of maximum effort. That even shades the torque from the Holden V6.

And here's the winner; fuel consumption.

The official rating for the Citroen C4 2.0 HDi is 6.6 litres/100km. I had no trouble averaging 6.5 litres/100km, even in suburban traffic.

The Commodore Omega's rating is 10.8 litres/100km and it uses 64 per cent more fuel than the Citroen C4. The C4 diesel has a wonderful surge from 2000rpm, has a flat underbelly to give good aerodynamics, runs quietly (2000rpm at 110km/h) and has a comfortable driving position thanks to height and reach adjustable steering and seat, although the A-pillar set well forward requires peering around.

The Citroen C4 2.0 HDi is very easy to live with. Especially on those few occasions when you call at the servo.

 


Snapshot

Citroen C4 Two-litre HDI

Price: $35,990

Engine: Four-cylinder, 16-valve, 1997cc, turbocharged diesel.

Power: 100kW at 4000rpm.

Torque: 320Nm-340Nm at 2000rpm.

Fuel consumption: 6.6 litres/100km.

Emissions: 175g/km.

Transmission: Six-speed sequential automatic.

Brakes: 283mm ventilated discs (front). 249mm solid discs (rear). ABS.

Wheels: 17 x 6.5 alloys.

Dimensions: 4260mm long, 1773mm wide, 1471mm tall, 2608mm wheelbase.

Performance: 0-100km/h, 10.4 seconds. 0-400m, 17.3 seconds. Top speed 207km/h.

 

In its class:

Peugeot 308 XSE two-litre HDi, $35,790

VW Golf Comfortline two-litre TDI, $34,790

Mazda3 two-litre diesel, $29,500

Fiat Ritmo Sport diesel (manual), $36,490


Which would you choose a small or medium car with a four-cylinder engine or a large petrol-guzzling 6-cylinder machine?


 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 16 comments

  • The problem with Aussie/USA GM & Ford gas as in petrol cars is at the end of the day, no matter how old and good you and yours is, its defunct the co 2 emissions that poisons the earth are very old 1950 in fact R&P steering was available in 1950 with the Morris Minor, holden/ ford invented that 50 years later, I will buy my 6th Citroen C5 that will out last any holden or ford with less fuel than what the Aussie, any real aussi car that can travel 1740k on 60L of diesel fuel will be ok

    OK by me, I laugh every time I see the TV add that Holden international is the place to be, in the non distant future, the Holden, Yank, & Ford, will be the low life stock of the world, & Holden wants us to believe that they are leaders with the INTERNATIONAL WORLD, no doubt the Aussie Labor/ Green Government will demand, that all motor vehicles will be set by Aussie, Yank Tanks and Holdens & Aussie Fords, will move the WORLD FORWARD, for Ordinary Australians, or for that matter Working Australians. I will stick with Citroen regardless.

    anthony Walsh of RYE Vic Posted on 26 August 2010 10:50pm
  • to Dave,
    I buy a car which does not need spare parts!!!
    Let’s face it, Ford ( Fix Or Repair Daily) and Holdens are build to keep the repair trade going!!!  Hardly a day is passing where a broken down Holden or Ford is blocking the traffic flow.They were inadequate 40 Years ago, now even more so. Faulty suspensions,brakes, leaking engines, gear boxes are still all to common. I mostly bought 10 to 15year old Citroens with anything to 300 to 400000 km and added another 200000km to it whit out any problems. I just traded my old CX2500 with 520000km for old C5 diesle with 200000km which runs better then any new Falcomdore!!

    Flix Swisse Posted on 31 October 2009 12:27am
  • Each to their own is right. I’d take a Citroen over a gas guzzling, emission pumping Commodore or Falcon any day.

    Sean Posted on 07 December 2008 3:19pm
  • i could not go past a large australian 6/8. Great value, cheap to service and source parts, roomy - important if you are to convert to LPG. These are designed for australian conditions, unlike many others. Some of these cars are basic, but helps keep weigh down at times - the original commordores were about 1300kg. Lastly I have owned Aussie cars for 16 years, never had any problems more serious than a leaky radiator or a failed fuel pump. All parts were readily available. None of these were new cars, most averaged 10yrs old. How will these imports fair, after several years? Buy, Australian and be proud.

    dave Posted on 25 June 2008 12:57pm
  • The really beaut part about the bigger, less fuel efficient Australian Cars is that in about 18 months when petrol hits $3.00 a litre, you will be able to pick one up for next to nothing.

    I have been driving a 1.6 Citroen Xsara (petrol) for the last eight years and I am about to step into a 2 litre C4 Diesel.

    Once upon a time I bought an Australian car and went thru 3 auto gearboxes 4 water pumps an 2 radiatiators in 19 months - I’m sticking with European cars.

    I’m assured that Australian cars are much better than they were ten years ago - but quite frankly, I couldn’t care less.

    Ashley Groome of Melbourne Posted on 22 June 2008 1:14am
  • The C4 2 litre HDI is a cracker of a car: the ride is somewhat ordinary, but the handling, steering, braking, dynamics, and, err, economy are all significant….and sparking!

    This car is a virtual sports car in an environmentally (and safety) conscious design with excellent change points in the gearbox, and great torque where you need it.
    It is great fun to drive, and sensible at the same time.

    If you want more of a “family” sized car, however, the Citroen C5 might be closer, and that DOES ride much better than the Holden or Falcon, (and probably most BMWs and Mercedes!) In the HDI guise, the economy is great: we can even tow a horse float (and horse!) with the 2 litre at 110km with ease, and tours in a much better manner than any of the others (and economically.) It won’t accelerate like a six or eight, but really, in just about every other department it is a great car.

    The older 1.6 HDI in the C4 was a utilitarian, pleasant and economical car, but the 2 litre is a great little package all round.

    gary kurzer of sydney Posted on 07 May 2008 1:37am
  • Over the past 6 years we have 4 Citroen’s, the first a Berlingo Van, and a C3 for the wife, the Berlingo went as far as Alice Springs in all it covered well over 95k with fault whatsoever, the C3 we drove it to Perth W A, that covered well over 80K no problems, we then owned a C4 H D I, we were astounded by the fuel consumption never ever exceeded 4.5ltr per 100k, we traded that in after 2 years of ownership, and never ever had any problems, we now own a C4 H D I,EGS box and Glass roof, we are getting aprox 4.4 ltr per 100k and would never buy any of the big 3, Snob Value never though about it, Environment Value yes still goes twice as far as any big3 on a lot less fuel.Anthony

    Anthony Walsh of RYE Vic Posted on 25 April 2008 12:58pm
  • Having had Calais, Fairmont Ghia and Verada (the pick of the three,) level cars during my working life, I now drive a VW Golf diesel.  It has all the room to do extended interstate holidays; comfortable, with fuel economy to embarrass even the hybrids. It is easier to park, hasn’t had the quality issues I have had with Ford, Holden and Toyota. The performance is outstanding. Same torque as the big sixes!
    I would not go back to them, and I would certainly not go back to petrol power.

    David of Mornington Peninsula Posted on 22 April 2008 11:46pm
  • What I would be interested in is the comparison between a dedicated LPG ford and a diesel Citroen. With diesel at over $1.60 per litre and LPG at around 60 cents which would be the most economical and the most environmentally friendly?and well there is servicing costs and deprecation.

    Gavin Taylor of Healesville Posted on 22 April 2008 11:17pm
  • I’ll leave the Citroen C4 for Common Sense of Sydney and his city snob friends. I much prefer my Ford and am wondering at this time if C S has really had a good look at one in the last 10 years, moreso the last three years. For a commuter in the city, yes by all means go for a small car but for touring (which we in the country happen to do quite a bit of) it is hard to go past either Falcon or Commodore for value for money and touring comfort.

    Graham of Glenfield Posted on 22 April 2008 8:42pm
  • Dear Common Sense from Sydney, I can understand where you are coming from. There are a lot of people everywhere that are so brand driven that they would drink toilet water if it had an Italian name. On the other hand there is a gowing sense among a lot of people I have spoken to who have finally realised that Australian doesn’t have to mean bogan and that we too can make products that are equal to anywhere in the world. A lot of people have gotten over the cultural cringe.

    Anyone who can describe a car that has ride and handling equal or better than a Mercedes or BMW, an engine with technology, sophistication and efficiency as good as any Honda, safety as good as a Mercedes or Volvo or an Interior that is classier than anything VW or Peugeot can come up with for the price that common familes can afford as unsophisticated or basic has not really ventured very far outside their home for a long time.

    There will always be people who will place an inordinate amount of value on a brand and be smug about driving around behind a Mercedes or BMW badge just as there will always be people who will whizz past them in traffic equally smug in the knowledge that they have the better product and the extra cash still in their bank account.

    To each his own, I guess.

    Sasha of Darwin Posted on 22 April 2008 4:58pm
  • Holden & Ford base models are the most basic hulks of metal and plastic on the road. I don’t know any private buyer in Sydney that would actually opt for one of these over any Euro car. Holden & Ford can be left to the rental car companies and country bumpkins.

    Common Sense of Sydney Posted on 19 April 2008 8:57pm
  • We tried a small car for around a year, believing that they had become good enough to replace a Falcon or Commodore. The car we got was one of the class leading cars and ours was the top of the line version with leather and all gizmos. We were wrong and after a year we could not stand it any longer. A big problem with the car after being used to a Falcon was its ride and noise suppression. Even on simple country roads that you find around the outer suburbs the noise inside the cabin was unacceptable. Another thing was the feeling of safety. Trucks became scary objects. We also found that the fuel economy saving to be not as great as we had hoped. In the end we only saved 1.5 litres/100 km. The main reason was that on longer distances and at higher speeds with four passengers and luggage the fuel economy of the car became worse than it was in the city. The Falcon on the other hand became better over longer distances. Something else we felt was that the Falcon’s huge reserves of power provided us another dimension of active safety and it feels very very much more stable.

    We went back to a six speed Falcon XR6 and life is good again. In six months we will be updating this car and it will probably be one of those new Falcons.

    On reflection it is true that small cars have gotten better but then so have large cars. In my view the gap is as big as it always was. I would add of course that this applies to our situation and life style. Everyone is different and has different needs. So to each his or her own.

    Sasha of Darwin Posted on 18 April 2008 2:03pm
  • try telling that to the tens of millions of Europeans who actually classify this size car as a “family car”

    Scott Posted on 18 April 2008 5:05am
  • My wife and I are already looking at the peugeot and citroen for our next car. Neither is that small. They are a family sized car.

    Russell of Gold Coast Posted on 17 April 2008 6:17pm
  • A small car is no alternative for a family sized car.

    dave Posted on 17 April 2008 3:30pm
Read all 16 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links