Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Chery J1: review

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • image

    The J1 has a pleasing design, but the cabin package is let down. Photo Gallery

Paul Gover road tests and reviews the 2011 Chery J1.

The price is right on the Chery J1. The first Chinese passenger car to hit the road in Australia always had to be cheap to make an impact, and the bottom line is just $11,990 - on the road. The value is unquestionable, the J1 is the new Australian price leader, and the deal includes 24-7 roadside assistance for the length of the three-year, 100,000-kilometre warranty.

But the J1 is playing catch-up, and not just because Chery of China came to carmaking later than the Japanese and Korean brands that now dominate in Australia. The quality on the car is well below the accepted standard in local showrooms and the J1 also needs some engine room tweaking before the performance is up to par.

Chery is China's largest independent vehicle manufacturer with five assembly lines, two engine factories, a transmission plant and total production last year of 680,000 vehicles. It has ambitious export plans and Australia is its first big target, and a useful test case.

The local Chery importer - Ateco Automotive - believes the dollar deal on the J1 will be more than good enough to draw plenty of buyers, and it has already forced Suzuki to match the bottom line with its tiny Alto. Ateco has already proven the point with the Great Wall utes and SUV it also handles and has big plans for both Chinese brands in coming years.

VALUE

It's impossible to fault the J1 on the value front. It costs a miserly $11,990, including on-road costs, and the deal provides two airbags, ABS brakes, air-conditioning, power steering, remote keyless entry, alloy wheels, power mirrors and front electric windows. The sound system is MP3 compatible.

The most important missing ingredient is ESP stability control, which means it cannot be sold in Victoria. But there is no Bluetooth, either. Rating the value means lining it up against the smaller - but better finished - Alto that starts at $11,790 with a smaller engine but is being sold at $11,990 driveaway to match the Chery.

It also needs to be compared with something like the impressive new Nissan Micra. The J1 is nearly 30 per cent cheaper than the Nissan, and that says a lot.

TECHNOLOGY

There is nothing special about the J1. It's a conventional five-door hatchback with a 1.3-litre baby engine, space for five inside with a reasonable boot, and a five-speed manual gearbox working the front wheels.

"Chery is known for its focus on constant innovation and drive towards better quality, well-appointed cars at an affordable price," says Ric Hull, managing director of Ateco Automotive. So far, though, the J1 is a predictable - not outstanding - newcomer.

DESIGN

The J1 has a pleasing design with a shape intended to maximise cabin space, particularly in the rear seats. Adults have no worries about headroom in the little Chery. The dashboard shows a little flair, and some youth focus, but the cabin package is let down - badly - by plastic pieces that don't match or fit together particularly well.

It's something the Chery team needs to fix, and fix fast, to satisfy picky Australian buyers. The sub-standard work also includes body parts that are not properly painted and plastic trim bits which do not do their job properly or fit together well.

Ateco says the J1 is a work-in-progress, but early buyers should not be made into guinea pigs for Chery quality.

SAFETY

No ESP is a big failing. But Ateco promises it will be fitted no later than November. We're also waiting to see what happens when NCAP gets a J1 for some serious independent crash testing. It definitely doesn't look like a five-star car.

DRIVING

The Chery J1 is not the best car on the road. Not by a long shot. In fact, it is badly under-done in some areas. We can understand the sub-standard quality because Chery is moving into a new and very tough car market in Australia, and Chinese buyers are snapping up anything with wheels. At least Chinese companies have a history of rapid updates and improvements.

But the J1 is also lacklustre to drive, thanks to poor gearing and a body that feels 'loose' compared to other baby-car choices. The Chery does not like hills, or hill starts, where it takes a lot of revs and some clutch slip to get going.

Thankfully, Ateco promises a change to the final-drive ratio very soon. The engine also has a 'hanging throttle', something that also blights some Proton models, and it makes smooth driving tough. There is no news on any change there.

Even so, the J1 rides nicely enough, is quiet, has comfy seats and - after all - is very, very cheap. It is basic transport and people will buy the car because it comes at a second-hand price with new-car backup.

It is easy to criticise the J1 and complain about what needs to be improved, but the Chery baby is a first from the brand and China and everyone knows things are only going to get better.

VERDICT: A great deal, but not a great car.

SCORE: 6/10 WE LIKE: Price, price, price WE DON'T LIKE: Performance, quality, unproven safety

Chery J1

PRICE: $11,990 driveaway
ENGINE: 1.3-litre four cylinder
OUTPUT: 62kW/122Nm
ECONOMY: 6.7litres/100km
EMISSIONS: 254g/km
RIVALS: Hyundai Getz (from $13,990): 7/10 Nissan Micra (from $12,990): 8/10 Suzuki Alto (from $11,790): 6/10

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 37 comments

  • Just took the Chery J1 for a test drive and with the reviews I read I didnt expect much however I desperately need a new run about so I decided to test it out. Transmission was fine, road noise was minimal and I felt pretty comfy in the little buzz box. However, there were things that just bought the whole car down…the stereo was beyond pathetic, I couldnt read the speedo, hardly any room in the back seat (I’m only 5’7 and I would find it squishy) and I found I was contantly pushing the car to keep speed (I currently drive a car with a 800cc motor and it keeps speed better!). For $10,990 drive away ud think “as long as it gets me from A to B it doesnt matter”....that isnt the case. Basically to sum it up, the Chery is nearly there but spend $1500-$2000 more for a brand new run about.

    Jake from Darwin Posted on 21 April 2012 4:56pm
  • you fellows can go on knocking until the cow come home.  like it or not, the chineses are coming.  as you might already knew, the japanese have already come, and followed by koreans.

    jojo of australia Posted on 19 April 2012 2:40pm
  • I Wouldn’t drive a Chery or a Great Wall car if they gave it to me for free. i’ll go with a car which i know what i get Value For Money.

    China should stick to Home appliances & Chery or a Great Wall should leave the car market to manufacturers who know how to build a car not a Reject.

    Who here Agrees with me?

    RELLIK Posted on 19 April 2012 2:52am
  • Where do I start, Day 1 no air-conditioning, Day 2 no headlights in pouring rain, Took it back they apparently fixed it. Week 5 no air-conditioning, indicators stay on solid not blinking, brakes make dreadful squishing sound and are very touchy, hates hills and has horrible surging as if petrol is not flowing,  Absolutely loved it when I picked it up but am now very disappointed and almost worried about what is going to happen next. Serious issues for an experienced driver of 28 years, I would not let an inexperienced driver in this car. I bought a cheap car so I would have backup and not have the problems of a used car, sorry now that I did.

    Sally Morgan of Oxenford Posted on 17 April 2012 10:20pm
  • The fact that Victoria has banned it should be a warning shouted loud and clear.

    Jane McPherson of Sydney Posted on 13 January 2012 10:50pm
  • I hate to see that people can’t appreciate this vehicle. No, I would not buy one. However, if you, like my mother dreams of owning a brand new car, just for the sake of it, once in your life. Or if you are a young person with no mechanical background or knowledge, why would you NOT but these vehicles. As a mechanic I can say they ARE built cheap and they ARE NOT as safe as other vehicles. But hey, neither are most of the late 80’s hatchbacks that teens and broke pensioners tend to own. Heck my first car was an ‘88 N13 Nissan Pulsar. No airbags, no ABS, No ESP, nothing! But it was one of the best cars I ever owned, it never played up, and yet they were renowned lemons and said to be dangerously unsafe in recent used car reviews.

    Snakey of Snowy Mtns Posted on 11 January 2012 6:08pm
  • Great little car for the price. Typically most Australian’s have a champagne taste but only earn a beer wage. We are quick to criticise but look at the pseudo Australian car, the Holden (own by GM America and money sent back to the US but it has an Australian name “Holden”- an old coach builder, nothing to do with the car ha ha ha), still not perfected after all this time. Constantly breaking down with poor workmanship and over priced. Give me a Chery any day!

    Jo Taz of Lindfield Posted on 02 November 2011 5:15pm
  • Do not buy under any circumstances. Absolute rubbish. Chinese should stick to making cheap clothes and plastic toys instead.

    Richard of Brisbane Posted on 26 October 2011 2:14pm
  • Seriously ... this car says that Australians will buy sub-standard crap providing it’s cheap enough. This car is less safe than we require on Australian roads from a new build car and this should be made clear ... you increase your safety risk with this car, but you only save a few dollars ... why not advise people to walk away? Why tell people its “good value” when “CHEAP and NASTY” is what you really mean.

    Scotty of Canberra Posted on 26 October 2011 11:04am
  • Note to everyone, this car just got a shonky award for having roof rails that cant be used…. for cosmetics only apparently. Would you take a car like this seriously, I’d rather walk. Why wasn’t this mentioned in the review (Paul ????), It is a bloody significant point I would think.

    Paul Posted on 25 October 2011 5:29pm
  • 12k for Chinese crap or a second hand BMW, Audi, Merc, Alfa etc. Erm ... Still, I know which choice the majority of Australians will make. Sigh. Such a nation of boring people we are. At least this means more bargains for the people who know what a real car is smile

    Nathan Posted on 12 October 2011 1:37am
  • @Martin - And where are those roller blades made again?

    john Posted on 17 September 2011 9:54pm
  • Bottom line for me: I’d rather buy a pair of roller blades than get around in something made in China.

    Martin of Australia Posted on 10 September 2011 6:28pm
  • “The most important missing ingredient is ESP stability control, which means it cannot be sold in Victoria” … It has the power of an asthmatic hamster and understeers like a pig. You’d have to drive like a complete lunatic before it even turned on.
    “But there is no Bluetooth, either” … So what ?
    “It definitely doesn’t look like a five-star car.” … Such a professional statement. It got 3 stars - more than your beloved XC Barina. Is it too much to ask for some actual information for a review? Not just some uninformed comments from the front bar.

    john Posted on 06 September 2011 3:00pm
  • I owned an X1 Hyundai Excel for 9 years and had few problems. Despite people saying early Hyundais were no good, the X1 had Mitsubishi running gear and was a great car. However, I dont think I would risk buying a car from a new company again.

    The Masked Commenter of Brisbane Posted on 17 May 2011 4:42pm
  • Remember it’s price people are always scared off whats new, remember when Hyundai broke into the market everyone bagged them out , people think of conspiracy theories etc for 11k can you go wrong

    Ant of Sydney Posted on 16 May 2011 10:29am
  • What’s the point of air bags when the dash board ends up near the rear seat in head on accidents. Buyer beware its amazing that the govt lets such death traps into the country.

    Joe Public Posted on 30 April 2011 9:55pm
  • Is it worth it to buy A Cherry J1?

    Junaine Stanley of Port Elizabeth Posted on 28 April 2011 7:18am
  • I love the spin by Ateco ‘constant innovation, well appointed’ etc
    This car proves that is a blatant lie by a spin doctor.  ‘Cheap, basic and budget’ are what comes to mind.  Just don’t try and sell one 2nd hand since no one will buy it unless its almost free.

    Wheres bear of Albany Creek Posted on 15 April 2011 3:03pm
  • Watch that space - everyone bagged Hyuandai when they entered Australia - and then the Excel became Australia’s best selling car - ever! And then the quality improved ... and ....

    John Ashmore of Brisbane Posted on 02 April 2011 12:00pm
  • Id happily pay the 30% premium for the Nissan Micra. I know where the extra money went.

    David of Cairns Posted on 21 March 2011 4:26pm
  • Great info for lady drivers trying to buy in a world of YES SHE’S FEMALE & OVER 50yrs ... as we maybe, but didn’t come down in the last shower. I personally think it is pathetic that I should have to take a male friend with me to get decent treatment from sales reps. Good stuff guys / girls, keep it coming!

    maureen walker of Cairns QLD Posted on 10 March 2011 1:46am
  • Keepleft of NSW - VW and Ford (Focus) do the same thing with only one reversing lamp. Yes, it’s pathetic to use. But to others who only have criticism, the Chery is new, and will probably have better crash rating than the other options some people have - an older second-hand car. No, I won’t be buying one.

    Alan of Logan Posted on 08 March 2011 1:26pm
  • I look at this car and I visualise me and my loved ones; smashed to pieces when crashed into by a 4 or 5 star car.

    I think to myself, that it should be illegal to sell cars in Australia if they do not attain ANCAP or EURO-NCAP 5-star ratings..

    If we can’t ban them, cars such as these should be insured off the road; if a car does not attain 5 stars, 3rd party insurance doubles or trebbles to fund the higher rates of injury and death that would be likely occur as some motorists do not consider the vehicles safety into the buying process.

    A Great-Wall SA220 would cost $4000 to insure per year, a VW Amorak would cost $1000.  These incentives would strongly discourage the death-dealers to dump the cars, or pressure for improvements.

    Chris Ford of Adelaide. Posted on 08 March 2011 11:35am
  • Like others have commented Paul, you basically tell us the car is underdone crap and still give it 6/10?  Rubbish like this wouldn’t be worth considering at half the price and I’m amazed it passes ADR’s.

    Jim C of Sydney Posted on 07 March 2011 12:39pm
  • Well, it does have a driver side rear fog lamp,- opposite the passenger side reverse!  So that IS a safety feature for thoe lousy weather conditons such as heavy fog, bushfire smoke, torrential rain, gravel roads when regular taillaights are rendered useless..

    I’d expect, as with all Chinese imports to date, that the car would have a Euro/UN spec hazard-warning triangle.  You never know when such could be handy.  (These are mandatory in China and India for new market cars etc).

    With ESP et al due November 2011 - I’d be keeping an eye on these.

    Keepleft of NSW Posted on 05 March 2011 8:39pm
  • Apart from the reasons previously outlined, one of the best reasons to avoid this car is because it is distributed by Ateco Automotive, meaning any “warranty” provided is not worth the paper it is written on! Give the Chinese 5-10 years and their own distributer (or at least anyone other than Ateco) and they might be worth a go.

    Jason of Canberra Posted on 04 March 2011 5:05pm
  • Ummm get it right in the first place before importing it in Oz. $12k is still alot of money that could get u a better substantial second car. 5-6yrs time this car will be a major DEATH TRAP for the P-platers. Image wise this substandardness will tarnish their brand for the next decades. No doubt they will get better but not on the expense of the public safety.

    phuong Posted on 04 March 2011 2:23pm
  • Danielb of Sydney.  No Koreans ha? I suppose you would buy a Holden then?  Let’s see, Spark, Barina, Epica, Captiva, all made in Korea and badged as Holdens.  Also, JD Power surveys show Hyundai has one of the best records in terms of customer satisfaction.  What do you drive mate?

    QP03 Posted on 03 March 2011 10:10pm
  • I would still buy an alto for many reasons. 1: Better Quality 2: Proven Reliable 3: SAFETY!!!

    In a day where goverments think speed cameras will save lives, how do we let this garbage on our roads.

    Anti-Chinga of Vic Posted on 03 March 2011 1:07pm
  • Paul has dropped his image as a credible car writer to one as a “promoter”. Why not have the guts and just say it is crap!
    Why do we lower our standards amd let in rubbish like the J1and the “Great wall”.
    Safety for the Australian car user has just done a U turn.

    Pete Smith of Melbourne Posted on 03 March 2011 12:06pm
  • I will never buy this chinese crap. It’s cheap, nasty, poor quality, pretty much inferior in every single way. The only thing is has going for it is it’s cheap. Which is the reason idiots will buy them. Same deal with Hyundai and Kia, I will never buy Korean. It’s cheap rubbish. Yes, the Koreans have gotten better, but frankly, the only place they could go is up, they really couldn’t get any worse.

    All these cars are, are reasons to buy second hand. The other really big problem with these cars especially from china, is that they’re not cars, they’re cheap throwaway consumer goods, to be replaced regularly. It’s not a car, it’s a piece of crappy chinese electronics.

    danielb of sydney Posted on 03 March 2011 9:43am
  • It may be below par now, but the Chinese should NEVER be under estimated. Consider this ‘strike one’. By ‘strike three’, the rest of the world will be worrying….

    Chris of Canberra Posted on 03 March 2011 7:53am
  • Unquestionable value? Is this comment/observation meant to be: 1) a cynical observation?, or 2) a joke in poor taste?

    I can’t for the life of me understand how a low price for an extremely poorly executed vehicle translate into a positive value proposition.

    Driving around in a vehicle of this ilk must surely be essentially equivalent to engaging in Russian roulette.

    N Champion of New England Region, NSW Posted on 03 March 2011 3:55am
  • After what was said it still got 6 out of 10?! The same score as the Getz?! Definitely sounded like a 4@ most.

    Vaughan Minto Posted on 02 March 2011 10:40pm
  • I could still recall the time when Alan Bonds (anyone remembering this fat cheating guy?) first introduced Hyundai into Australia back in the early 80s (?). Look what Hyundai has done to upgrade not only its corporate image but also its technologies! We probably don’t have to wait for another 2-3 decades for the Chinese car manufacturers to catch up - but perhaps another 10 years’ wait will be wise for them to bring their car quality to the present 2011 Hyundai level/ Anyone thinking to buy a Chinese made car should be patient to wait until 2021 but by then perhaps the Indonesians will be bringing in their own brand to our shore as well!!

    Zes Maniac of Glen Waverely Posted on 02 March 2011 7:15pm
  • *****PRIMO!*****

    Paul, did you mean minus-six, as in -6 out of 10?This car is trash and makes a good case to buy a late model 2nd. hand whatever instead of this, not really cheap when you consider they cost $5500 ex works China, one could *force* oneself to own one if it was say $7500 or similar but it make the Suzuki Alto look like a Rolls Royce, anybody who buys this needs his/her head read, its China’s anwser to Proton!China’s time WILL come, not now, and not with this, most likely be more reliable than a VW all the same…:-)

    FrugalOne of AUSTRALIA Posted on 02 March 2011 4:59pm
Read all 37 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links