Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Toyota Kluger: back with attitude

  • By James Stanford
  • Herald Sun
image

The latest Kluger is substantially better than the model it replaces and some will find it better than the Territory.

No one at Toyota Australia likes to be beaten. When the Ford Territory began its domination of the all-terrain wagon class, it stung the company that has dominated in the outback for a generation and become Australia's No.1 carmaker.

Toyota then argued the Territory wasn't a real four-wheel-drive because it was also sold with only rear-wheel-drive to tantalise families and boost value.

Its answer to the blue oval's Falcon-based wagon was the mid-sized Kluger, which was great off-road but felt floaty on the tarmac, lacked torque and looked as plain as a paper bag.

The Territory outsold the original Kluger three to one, but Toyota never gives up.

This time around, the new 2007 Kluger is bigger, more powerful, has more safety gear and actually has some style.

Toyota also realised more than half the Territories sold in Australia are rear-drive, so it now has the Kluger with front-drive or the regular all-wheel-drive.

It will be interesting to see how many people go down the all-paw path, which adds $4500 to the price across the range.

The Kluger is all-new, with a stiff new body that is 95mm longer and 85mm wider and has 22mm more ground clearance. It is also 95kg to 160kg heavier. The Grande model tips the scales at a hefty 2035kg.

Ground clearance for all Klugers has been jacked up from 184mm to 206mm.

The braked towing capacity has been increased by 500kg to an impressive 2000kg.

The official fuel economy figures go from 11 litres for 100km in ADR81/01 testing to 11.6 litres, which is about 1 litre/100km less than equivalent Territory models.

All have the smooth-revving 3.5-litre dual-overhead camshaft V6 that also serves in the Aurion. This time it is tuned to pump out 201kW and 337Nm.

It is linked to a five-speed automatic gearbox in both drivetrains, with the AWD model using a system that feeds 50 per cent of drive to the front.

Toyota has followed its main rivals and introduced Electronic Stability Control as standard across the Kluger range. It has gone a step further with seven airbags in all models.

Also standard is a small dashboard-mounted reversing camera.

There are three models, the base KX-R at $39,990, the KX-S at $49,990 and the Grande at $59,990.

The KX-S and the Grande come standard with seven seats, which can also be ordered for the entry-level KX-R for an extra $2500.

Apart from the impressive safety gear, standard gear for the KX-R includes 17-inch alloy wheels, air-conditioning, 3.5-inch multi-function display, cruise control and single CD sound with MP3 input jack.

The KX-S adds 19-inch alloy wheels, chrome exterior details, fog lights and leather trim. The electrically adjustable driver and passenger seats are also heated. The dual-zone climate control has separate controls for rear passengers. It also has six-CD sound and Bluetooth phone preparation.

Stepping up to the Grande brings a sunroof, more chrome, wood-grain inserts, keyless start, automatic closing hatch, DVD rear seat entertainment, satellite navigation, larger rear-view camera display (6-inch).

 

On the road

Almost everyone will rate it ahead of the Holden Captiva, apart from its price. The Kluger is now roomier, has better performance, looks better and has an impressive array of standard safety features.

A week in a two-wheel-drive Kluger SX-S revealed there is a lot to like about the big family hauler, but also revealed suspension flaws that could see the Kluger lose out in a comparison with the Territory.

But the first thing you notice is the styling. The Kluger now has a bit of attitude.

Painted black, with its tinted windows and chunky 19-inch wheels, the Kluger test car is imposing. The interior looks good, too, with a high level of surface quality you expect from a Toyota.

The rear-view camera, which sits between two air vents and doubles as an info screen, is tiny, but it is better than nothing.

The KX-S gets leather seats, which feel nice, and the heater function is great, but the seats aren't the most supportive around.

The Kluger really has only six useable seats. The middle seat of the second row is only 20cm wide, does not sit flush with the other seats and is only good for a very small or skinny child.

The Kluger's engine is quite nice, though it can be a bit peaky. A lot of the grunt comes up high in the rev range and the engine could do with some more torque down the bottom end.

Even so, the fuel consumption of 12.4 litres/100km is a big plus.

The engine is smooth, though it is not the quietest engine around, especially under hard acceleration.

If you push, you also notice the steering wheel tugging, especially if you are turning.

This (torque steer) happens because there is too much power going through just the front wheels. You can live with those sort of niggles, but it is the suspension of the two-wheel-drive Kluger that is a big let-down.

Despite being incapable of off-road work, the front-drive Kluger still has a hefty 206mm of ground clearance. On bumpy roads it pitches and rolls like a serious mud-plugger. A back-to-back test with the lower-riding Territory backs up the view the Kluger is too soft.

The Kluger feels like an off-roader. The Territory feels like a car.

But it's not the same in the all-paw Kluger, which feels firmer and much more planted. And it will definitely go as deeply into the bush as most families want to travel. So the all-wheel-drive is the driver's choice, but people on a budget will head for the new front-driver.

The bottom line

The Kluger ticks most of the family wagon boxes. An unnecessarily high ride height and soft suspension spoil the fun. 78/100

Fast fact

Kluger KX-S and Grande have three-zone climate control for all occupants. Each of the three rows of seats has a temperature display and control dials.

 


Inside view

Toyota Kluger KX-S 2WD

Price: $49,990 as tested

Engine: 3.5-litre V6

Power: 201kW at 6200 revs

Torque: 337Nm at 4700 revs

Transmission: five-speed automatic, front-wheel drive

Body: Five-door wagon

Seats: Seven

Dimensions: Length 4785mm, width 1910mm, height 1760mm, wheelbase 2790mm, tracks 1630/1645mm front/rear

Steering: Power-assisted rack-and-pinion

Suspension: Fully independent Macpherson strut front and multi-link rear

Fuel tank: 72 litres

Fuel type: Regular unleaded

Fuel consumption: Average on test 12.4 litres/100km

Weight: 1930kg

Spare tyre: Full size steel

Brakes: Anti-skid discs

Wheels: 19x7.5 alloy

Tyres: 245/55 R19

Safety gear: Anti-skid brakes, traction control, electronic stability control, front and side driver and passenger airbags, three-row curtain airbags.

Warranty: Three years/ 100,000km



Features

Airconditioning 4

Cruise control 4

Alloy wheels 4

Climate control 4

Leather seats 4

Heated seats 4

Parking sensors 8

Automatic wipers 8

4 standard equipment

8 nonstandard equipment



How it compares

Ford Territory Ghia: 80/100 ($52,090)

Holden Captiva Maxx: 70/100 ($42,990)

Mazda CX-7 Luxury: 73/100 ($45,560)

Nissan Murano ST: 68/100 ($49,990)

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 19 comments

  • I have had this car (KRK) 3 years and done 72,000 km still with original tyres. We easily tow a horse float with electric brakes (2,000kg) and it is fantastic coupling with the camera (never miss the tow-ball). Agree with the skinny middle rear seat but we have only one child and everyone comments on the roominess in the back compared with our previous Prado. Small fuel tank is a curse when towing. It is a wide car for shopping mall carparks. Great accelaration but speedo was over-reading by at least 5% Great car and will get another when lease runs out.

    Keith of CQ Posted on 14 June 2010 6:11pm
  • I can't believe how they can get this car 95% right but fail dismally in the internal layout. The narrow middle seat counts out my three kid family (skinny kids too!) and the lack of a split third row is just cost cutting. Very disappointed as other than these two factors this is the perfect car for us. I'm just wondering how long it will be until Toyota drops the "captains" seat in favour of a true three seater. I hope its soon...

    Chris J Posted on 01 November 2007 10:17am
  • Just picked up my car last week. All I can say is that I am totally happy with the looks and features of this car. I also have another Toyota which I can only have praise for. For quality and re-sale you can't go pass a Toyota.

    David Posted on 24 October 2007 9:57am
  • Weve been waiting for this model for some time. We almost bought a Territory but kept putting it off for something better, glad we waited for the Kluger. Persoally I feel its a much better car. There are some things that are far more important to me than seating configurations or towing capacity and thats service, reliability, quality control and resale and I can confidently say that Toyota should win hands down in these areas. What scared me off the Ford was lack of quality and the constant complaints I hear about the plastic components cracking, scratching and breaking. I dont like the thought of a plastic door clip breaking casuing the door to fly open or not be able to be locked or a window clip breaking in rain with the window stuck open, how many other important plastic components are waiting to break???

    John Smithson Posted on 15 October 2007 5:47pm
  • The new look and power is appealing but with a family of 5, the main downfalls were: non-split 3rd row seat, shocking narrow middle 2nd row seat - uncomfortable and inappropriate considering the width of the Kluger (interchangeable food tray????). We were really looking forward to the New Kluger but think with the Mazda CX-9 arriving at the end of the year, a lot of the above mentioed issues have been addressed, time will tell.

    Jason Johnson Posted on 08 October 2007 9:51am
  • We asked a baby capsule company to see if they couls install the capsule in the middle of the 2nd row, so that 3 kids can occupy the 2nd row - CAN'T BE DONE, without losing access to seatbelt clip for seat behind driver. This coupled with the fact that the 3rd row doesn't split is a deal breaker for us. Shame really because otherwise we like the car.

    Peter Posted on 06 October 2007 4:04pm
  • My wife and I took delivery of our new Kluger Grande AWD 10 days ago and so far it by far the best car we have ever owned (25 cars to be exact) the build quality is superb the ride is very comfortable for both us and our two young kids.The engine is plenty powerfull enough and so far economy is sitting at around 13.8 L/100 ks which is not bad for the around town driving we do and I expect the engine to loosen up with some K's.We traded a 2006 Jeep ltd deisel which was like driving a tractor compared to the Kluger and sat on around 12 L/100 k's so really not much better.We drove a territory which was nice but came nowhere near the Grandes specs and the CX7 was way too small inside again way down on features with our freinds CX7 using 17 L/100 ks of premiem fuel only being a worry.Anyone considering this car will not be disapointed it has exceeded our very high expectations and I cannot get my wife or the kids out of the damn thing.

    Darryn Posted on 03 October 2007 10:05am
  • when will toyota relise that some vehicles work better when they are rear wheel drive and ( more people will buy them ) im a mechanic by trade / and still in the industry. i like the toyota brand more than ford by the way ! thanks

    shaun bond Posted on 02 October 2007 12:58pm
  • We waited for the new Kluger to compare to the Territory. With a 3rd kid on the way, the 2nd row seating room was the critical factor. We took 3 child seats to the showroom and made them install them - they couldn't. But in the Territory - they could. End of story for us. Also, we found the Kluger's seat belt buckles in the 2nd seat seem to be further back in the seat, making it just that bit harder to clip and unclip, which when you're doing it 10 times a day, is another black mark. Sorry Toyota, but why didn't you match the width of the Territory in the back???

    Darrell Posted on 02 October 2007 11:00am
  • I may be wrong, Some one out there correct me but in the 2WD Toyota Klugrer Vs 2WD Ford Territory. I have owned heaps of Rear Wheel Drive and Also Front Wheel Drive and my current vehicle is a Front wheel drive. I have found on slopes, up hill grades and rough surface plus towing the rear wheel drive to be the best. I know the theory the FWD claws its way through the stuff and you have the weight over the wheels. but I have found the RWD far Better all round than the FWD, I think a back to back all round road test between the two may prove this, Am I wrong Folks?.

    Dave Hayden Posted on 28 September 2007 2:35pm
  • I found interesting the comment "The interior looks good, too, with a high level of surface quality you expect from a Toyota". I expect rubbish interior from Toyota, since all their base models use materials that can only be described as rubbish. Seats do not do it for me - there is virtually no support and the feel is awful. Maybe they would suite a very large person better. Driving experience is much worse than the Territory, and certainly not even close to better priced (but smaller) Mazda CX-7, for instance. I wish Ford sell a diesel and LPG Territory.

    Mikica Posted on 28 September 2007 12:24pm
  • I have a 2004 XLS with 131000 on clock - great car - New one has cacky middle seat which forces kds into dangerous rear seat, reduced rear middle seat leg room for god sake, bloody awful colours but worse of all you cannot get a light leather interior (like mine) unless you buy a Grande, plus I am going top need to pay and extra $4500 to get the same vehicle I have now (awd) and the dollar has gone through the roof since I bought mine, - Forget it - Bye Bye Kluger. I bet they don't publish this one - A lost buyer.

    Brian Yench Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • It's just another generic appliance from Toyota, lacking character and looks. The Kluger is definately not my choice.

    Peter Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • The stupid captains chairs in the second row, which effectively makes the KX-R a four seater, and the lack of roof rails (it is after all supposed to be an SUV) rule it out for me. Are you listening Toyota?

    Howard Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • I have been waiting some time now for the update to the Kluger hoping there will be an alternative to the Territory, and after reading the latest reports I must say that If it had rear wheel and/or all wheel drive I would certainly have seriously considered it the best vehicle for my future needs as I would like to tow a caravan also. Front wheel drive is not the best cofiguration for that duty. THe Territoyt is excellent for my needs but I'd rather drive a Toyota.

    John Harman Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • From a woman's point of view - for the price range it is a luxurious car and you can tell it is not Korean made. My kids are young so I could even live with the narrow middle seat as surprising it may seem it is still quite roomy. But one major, major fault is that the 3rd row seats do not split, not allowing 6 passengers plus luggage space which its cheaper competitors such as the Holden Captiva do provide. I will be waiting to see what the Mazda CX-9 has to offer. Keep trying Toyota!

    Maddie Young Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • I have a 2004 XLS with 131000 on clock - great car - New one has cacky middle seat which forces kds into dangerous rear seat, reduced rear middle seat leg room for god sake, bloody awful colours but worse of all you cannot get a light leather interior (like mine) unless you buy a Grande, plus I am going top need to pay and extra $4500 to get the same vehicle I have now (awd) and the dollar has gone through the roof since I bought mine, - Forget it - Bye Bye Kluger. I bet they don't publish this one - A lost buyer.

    Brian Yench Posted on 28 September 2007 9:57am
  • Unfortunately the pathetic middle seat in the second row does it in for me. The engine may be great, good looks etc - but if it's a compromise to live with in everyday usage - it doesn't even make the list.

    Paul Posted on 27 September 2007 3:47pm
  • It looks like the After Market Suspension Boys will have a ball here with the 2X Drive. But my money is on the FORD, Once they get a Diesel it will be "GOOD NIGHT NURSE" To the Toyota, I think Toyota are missing Australian Motor Trends more and more with each model They seem to be drifting away from local Australian Needs.

    Dave Hayden Posted on 27 September 2007 1:10pm
Read all 19 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links