Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

The new Falcon series

  • By Chris Riley
  • News Limited Community Newspapers
image The new Ford have designed the new Falcon according to customer's wants with better performance, fuel economy and safety features. Photo Gallery

The anticipation is finally over as Ford takes the wraps off its ?all new? Falcon range.

But looking at the car you'd be forgiven for confusing it with the old one. The two look very much alike.

Ford says more than 80 per cent of the sheet metal is either new, different or changed.

For all the changes, however, the car still sits on the same platform and is still powered by the same 4.0-litre straight six; so it's really not “all new.”

The new FG Falcon arrives at a time when sales of large cars continue to fall, as buyers opt for smaller, more economical vehicles.

It's one of the main reasons cited by Mitsubishi for the failure of the 380 and its decision to pull the plug on local manufacturing.

Launched 18 months ago, Holden's new VE Commodore is a success, but there's only so much pie to go around.

This must have been uppermost in Ford's mind when it allocated the budget for the FG Falcon program. This, and the lesson it learned with the launch of AU Falcon, whose then radical styling only served to alienate buyers. Not about to make the same mistake twice, it might explain why the new Falcon doesn't look that different?

Meanwhile, the new American V6 which we're told will replace the old workhorse is still a year or more away.

The FG range introduces a new naming structure, with a new sports luxury G Series sedan replacing the Fairmont, along with three different looks and a realignment of models and specifications.

The revised body structure is said to deliver significant improvements in structural integrity for greater occupant protection as well as improved vehicle refinement.

Inside there's more room for the driver's knees and 10mm more legroom in the back.

Ford Australia's new boss Bill Osborne said buyers told the company what they wanted in a new car?

“They've told us again and again that they want everything; they don't want to compromise," he said.

“They want more performance and improved fuel economy. They want more safety features; both passive and active."

“They want more user-friendly technology. And they want it all packaged in a vehicle that visually represents both them and what their car can deliver,” he said.

The new Falcon does not go on sale until May, but Ford decided to preview the car before making its debut at the Melbourne Motor Show in a couple of weeks.

Designers have moved the A and centre B pillars forward and the rear C pillar backwards to create class leading interior space. It also provides easier access to the car, with wider opening doors.

Power from the 4.0-litre straight six is up from 182 to 195kW and torque rises from 380 to 391Nm. The turbocharged six gets 270kW and 533Nm and the 5.4-litre V8, 290kW and 520Nm. Figures for the E-Gas, dedicated LPG engine remain virtually the same at 156kW and 372Nm.

The big news is the adoption of a five-speed automatic and electronic stability control as standard across the range.

Having said that, you get the choice of the six or LPG engine with the entry level XT, with the latter still hooked up to the old four speed auto.

Fuel economy with the five-speed auto drops to 10.5 litres/100km (Commodore's is rated at 10.9 litres/100km)

All petrol sedans come with four airbags, stability and traction control plus anti-lock brakes with electronic brake force distribution and emergency brake assist.

Curtain airbags are optional but fitted to premium models.

A reverse camera system is also offered with premium models.

Standard equipment includes climate air, four-way power driver's seat, four-speaker single CD audio system, a new, larger computer screen, cruise control and 60/40 split fold rear seats.

The all-new FG Ute will go on sale shortly after the sedan.

Prices have not been released.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 54 comments

  • I hear people say that the falcon 6 is a 50 year old engine, and the car is a taxi, cmon guys the falcon 6 is a great engine, masses of tourque, good fuel economy and proven reliability, thats why they are the taxi of choice, the v8 is just not up to scratch and thats just a fact, the turbo 6 is magnificant tho and producing a 13.4quar mile from 270kw and getting 12 something litres per 100km is pretty impressive. Theres no doubting the credentials of the holden v8 but the alloytec v6 is a massive dissapointment. drive a vy with a ecotec v6 then a vz with a alloytec v6 and try and spot the difference, for such a high tec multi valve free revving engine it is nowhere near a falcon 6

    brad of melbourne Posted on 11 April 2008 9:03pm
  • The new Falcon looks great and the new FPV's look the goods, obviously Prodrive has had allot of influence on the sports models. And as for you tossers crapping on about build quality, take a look at the recalls for VE. Last but not least knocking the FPV's before there even released-so sad, both Wheels and Motor magazines are betting on sub 5 second zero to 100km per hour In the F6 range. And thank god the base model Falcons look classy unlike the VE which Is a dead set ringer of an 90's Vauxill.

    Chris Fluke of Penrith Posted on 11 March 2008 10:19pm
  • Bruce Ford, the new falcon does'nt look anything like the VE Bommodore.Maybe you should make an appointment with your local optomertrist!!! By the way have you ever compared the recalls between the Falcon and Bommodore,you may be unpleasantly surprised.

    stephan jelenic Posted on 07 March 2008 3:58pm
  • No one here can demonstrate with any objectivity with the FG is not a great car. Does anyone have anything to say other than: the FG looks ugly/like a VE , Ford don't make a 7L V8, its a taxi engine etc...What about engineering, design, build quality and use of technology. Anyone with any intelligent points to make?

    Luke Posted on 05 March 2008 10:13pm
  • Len, Hyundi's always fresh, but that don't make it a better car than an equivalent. The fresh new FG range will be more powerful and more efficient, and safer than its equivalent Holden model. All that i care about is which performance family car is better value. Up until the FG I would have agreed with you, it was the VESS. Its funny how you say you have no interest in 6's but you keep trying to compare/bag them. Why do it if your not interested? The +$130k BMW 540i V8 4l with 225kW and 390Nm averages 10.4l/100km compared to a $35k FG XT I6 4l with 195kW and 393Nm averages 10.1l/100km, gee thats a huge benefit in peformance for a BMW that costs 4times more than the falcon. Considering its a 45year old motor. With your W427 = $125k i spoke to a holden rep at the motorshow who stated "IF" it comes out it'll cost about $150k give or take a few $k's. Who cares anyway it aint going to be that much quicker than a $65k FG F6 or VE R8. Who cares about DOD chev engines? you cant buy them here unless you import a chev.

    Dann of Melbourne Posted on 05 March 2008 5:11pm
  • Dan, pull your head out of the sand. I made no reference to V6 Holden engines or fuel economy. Holden is always fresh with the latest GM engines whilst Ford can only provide a 45 year old six cylinder. Fuel economy is not a reason why I buy a car, as I said I buy full on cars like HSV which you fail to get your head around. Holden and other makes deliver, Ford fails and their car looks like a BF upgrade. They do not listen to the public or build on any V8 Supercar heritage. I dont buy six cylinder cars and have no interest in them, especially an old cab motor. In fact with regards to fuel economy why can a V8 BMW 540 achieve 8.5L/100 highway cycle and a six cylinder Ford struggles to achieve 10L/100. Finally the 7 litre HSV is $125K not $150K. The new Chevrolet engines are also D.O.D. which Ford has also failed to provide, i.e. six cylinder economy out out 300kw engines. Get your facts first and read my text correctly before you put your foot back in your mouth or are you simply uneducated in English literature.

    Len of Melbourne Posted on 05 March 2008 3:46pm
  • Len - Melbourne, its funny how you bag the falcon I6, when it's more responsive/fuel efficient/powerful than the commodore V6, even though it’s heavier. So what are you saying about the holden V6? Is it really that bad? With regards to your comments on the 7l commodore, why would anyone pay $150k for a commodore when you can buy a F6 for $60k an only be a few tenths of a second slower 0-100 (W427 = 4.7s, BF F6 = 5.4s, FGF6 =sub 5s est)? It just goes to show that HSV doesn't have the technology to put all that power to the ground. What a waste. As for the new FG XR6T it will blitz the SS in performance, and yet only drink 11.7l/100km compared to 14.3l/100km. Pull your head out of the sand and physically go drive a FG, believe me you'll be suprised.

    Dann of Melbourne Posted on 05 March 2008 2:14pm
  • Did anyone (who went to the melb motor show) notice how much smoother the 6speed manual felt on the XR8, relative to the SS? The ergonomics on the FG were so much more user friendly then the old BF and VE. On the VE you are constantly looking down to use their HMI whereas on the falcon it’s higher up and more inline with the view of the road. The set out of the interior is hot. Admittedly it looks like the centre section of the dash was a lift out of the VE (style only). But, the feel of the HMI buttons and its functionality are a class better than the VE. The VE feels tacky in comparison; it has a heap of movement in its controls whereas the FGs are much more precise. Funny thing is that for me to open the glove box on the VE I practically had to jump out of the passenger side of the car. This was because the glove box was flush with the edge of the dash, unlike with the FG which is more under the dash. Also what’s with the hand brake on the VE (fugly!). Even the way the boot and doors operate on the falcon more precisely. The VE auto gear stick has heaps of movement side to side relative to the falcon.

    Dann of Melbourne Posted on 05 March 2008 2:06pm
  • The Falcon is a continuing Ford failure. The car looks mostly like a BA/F update, similar front on XR and same taillights which we have had for six years. You cant get a V8 in anything other than an XR while I can go to Holden and buy a 6 Litre Calais. All they want to sell you is yet another tired old 4 litre six cylinder taxi cab motor. They have lost their Van, Wagon, LTD, Fairlane and identity. No wonder the Ford heartland has become Holden and other brands. This is just another taxi cab and an example of Ford inability to listen and repond to the market like Holden who build on their heritage. HSV offers a 7 Litre hero car for bragging rights and what will Ford try to sell me, a 4 Litre turbo which equates to 7 litre (FIA 1.7 conversion factor) and still cant offer a grunty V8 to match a Chevrolet, BMW or Mercedes V8. I am a buyer who wants full on V8 cars like HSV, BMW and Mecedes deliver and I cant get a Ford. Ford threaten to leave Australia, maybe they should, only Holden gives the local punters what they want.

    Len of Melbourne Posted on 05 March 2008 9:34am
  • Mr Bruce Ford your comments are so ill informed they don't deserve to be dignified with a response! The motoring press and the Australian public will determine the FGs success. I suspect you might be unpleasantly surprised by what they discover.

    Luke of Sydney Posted on 02 March 2008 10:39pm
  • Tony Bozic -- "Show me a good looking US car nowadays" Personally, I don't think you need look further than Chrysler or Cadillac, both of which still make bold, original, stylish, unmistakeably masculine cars, especially in the upper end of their range. Unfortunately with any American cars, the build quality is absolutely crap (probably thanks to the growing Mexico manufacturing), they're worse even than Ford Aust. Holden or Kia, and not much better than Chinese car makers. Of course, they arrive on our shores at more than double the price, even before any taxes -- decent looks really aren't worth the cost.

    kris of melbourne Posted on 29 February 2008 10:31pm
  • Some of you guys leaving feedback, and even the guys writing these articles, should take a good hard look at yourselves. The FG Falcon is an Australian made car, built by Australians with Australian made components, for Australian conditions. All true Australians should be proud of what Ford and GMH are doing locally, and support them 100%, and quit the negativity. Falcon or Commodore, buy Australian and be proud! I want my kids to still have a choice to buy Australian when they grow up!!

    Mark of Victoria Posted on 29 February 2008 3:15pm
  • The Orion is a AU/BA I cannot believe Ford is serious, it will be a flopmobile like the AU, Mitsubishi 380 and Toyato Avalon. I have driven all the VE. V6 Commodes, they ride like billy-carts and sound like trucks, the Orion cannot be worse in that regard. Good luck Ford

    William J Sinclair of Bendigo Posted on 28 February 2008 4:56pm
  • The BA mark 5 or is it the Fool s gold Foulcan .Should be called the emperors new clothes Falcon!! A GM exec one called the AU 2 this fine discription and one beffiting the FG,iT DONT MATTER HOW MUCH LIPSTICK U PUT ON A PIG ITS STILL A PIG,.How true again!!

    Phil De-Ath of melbourne Posted on 23 February 2008 6:08pm
  • It's a BA, why bother? VE Commode I drove all V6 versions plus Statesman, all ride like billy-carts and sound like trucks.

    Will S of Bendigo Posted on 23 February 2008 5:33pm
  • Ford why bother it looks like a BA, now if it looked like the new Citroen C5 for 2009. Commodore, I drove all versions including Statesman, they ride like billy-carts and sound like trucks .

    WoW of Bendigo Posted on 23 February 2008 1:07am
  • I work with other engineers, and we have cut these cars apart, we all shook our heads at the VE on what we saw under the outer skin. 20 year old technology, very backwards tech. A place where they know the customer never looks. The car was designed and targeted for the affordable bogan market here and to export to the US. (Show me a good looking US car nowadays) The look at me car. Where looks just matter, not the most important part - build quality. Their are 40% less welds on the VE car, then the falcon, you wonder what holds it together then. Holden has always worked like this for decades. Selling more cars doesn't mean more profits, they run two assembly shifts, compared to one at fords. More overheads, more costs. Holden register there cars before they get to the dealer, to suck in the market on overall sales. Let the professionals judge (carguide etc) the two cars and give us a verdict. There's way more to a car then looks. Working on both cars, the falcon 2 years & VE 3 years. The falcon will clean-up on this one. Sorry VE fans. Ford spend the money where it matters most this time. Safety & Quality.

    Tony Bozic Posted on 21 February 2008 4:58pm
  • Where exaclty do you see the similarites? In the refined cabin, the headlights or in the rear ende which is quite balanced. I challenge you to conduct and publish a side by side comaprison and highlight these similarities. By the way, the V6 due in 2010 is actually european sourced. To all those who left negative comments - your the fools, who want to destroy the automotive industry in Australia and sell our furture to the chinese. Support your local industry.....Not about to make the same mistake twice, it might explain why the new Falcon doesn't look that different?..... And your a automotive journalist?

    steve of Melbourne Posted on 21 February 2008 3:39pm
  • Bruce Ford, your opinion is so ill informed its sad. The inline Barra 6 engine is a world class engine. Your accusation of it being a 50 year old engine is laughable, considering it was a completely new design in 2002, with the release of the BA. Consider that the Barra had 4 valve percylinder, dual independant VCT back in the BA, while Holden still had the (literally) 20 year old ecotec with 2 valves per cylinder and single fixed cam. Also consider that within months of its release, aftermarket tuners were pulling up to 1000hp out of the xr6 turbo with just bolt on mods and replacement conrods, whereas spending the same amount on the ecotec would have been lucky to produce half of that amount. As for the FG copying the VE, thats a joke, have a look at the VE headlights, they are virtually a direct copy of the BA headlights.

    Luke of QLD Posted on 21 February 2008 11:23am
  • Same old venturi LPG system, same power output and same old 4speed auto, what a joke. How about a modern fuel injected LPG system and at least a 5speed auto or better still the ZF 6speed auto, missed opportunity again by Ford.

    Larry Duncan Posted on 21 February 2008 9:14am
  • Oh my god... Same banana, new skin. Ford Australia would have to be the most prehistoric, boring car maker in the world. A straight 6? Still? This engine is fast approaching the 50 year old mark, and I dont care how much you rework it... it's old, rattley, and past it. But I must say congratulations on Ford's display of independant body styling... even I couldn't have copied a Commodore better. Ford Australia... just give up... your just a bad joke.

    Bruce Ford Posted on 21 February 2008 7:29am
  • To Michael from Canberra, boot space is not compromised in the current falcon as both cylindrical tanks are located in the same position the petrol tank would be otherwise. This will of course, be the same deal in the FG.

    James of Melbourne Posted on 20 February 2008 5:55pm
  • Your all boring! why would anyone wana throw away their money on something that looks like any other ordinary car??!! BORING If it at least had a new body shape then it would be worth having a conversation about it.. but look at it seriously looks like another camry/commodore... ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!

    Sands Posted on 20 February 2008 2:50pm
  • To phil of Melbourne- before you talk about build quality take a look at your prescious ve dunnydoor, how many recalls? and while we are on the subject over the last few years HOLDEN RECALLS about 66 or was that 68 to FORDS -25.

    THE BIG D of IPSWICH Posted on 20 February 2008 1:46pm
  • Another large Australian car lump with engines to match!! When are we going to wake up to the fact that petrol WILL reach $2.50 a litre (as it is in Europe) and that cars like this are dinosaurs. If you want to see up to date cars even 'approaching' economy then view what's coming on in Europe. In Aus, we've got a lot to learn a bit more about the coming oil shortage and this 'climate' thing..... and it's going to be painful!

    Geoff Roberts of NSW Posted on 20 February 2008 11:26am
  • The car looks great but the let down is the failure to update the driveline of the LPG model and to fit the square lpg tanks that are availible in America, If you want to win back sales, then give the market a car with boot space that can run on LPG. Also not updating the wagon could be costly.

    Michael of Canberra Posted on 19 February 2008 11:33pm
  • Ford's comment that SUVs have been eating into sales, and yet the wagon version is a warmed over (am I being too generous?) version of the existing. I own a BA Futura wagon, coming up on 5-years old, and I don't need or want the weight and poor economy of a Territory, the poor dynamics of a Kluger, or the high fuel and servicing costs of a CX-9 (10k or 6-months service intervals - today with latest technology?)... although at least the CX-9 looks good. Families are opting for the flexibility of a SUV... and that's my need too, but I need low running costs also. Ford you are missing an opportunity. Perhaps the new Commodore wagon will do it for me...

    John of NSW Posted on 19 February 2008 10:01pm
  • Chris, good to see your a biased one eye'd holden supporter

    bob Posted on 19 February 2008 9:53pm
  • Too little too late. It might be better and have fancy new names, but it still looks like a 20th Century special. Regardless, Ford may yet manage to take Toyota's number one spot - in designing a better fridge on wheels!

    Frank Hope Posted on 19 February 2008 9:40pm
  • From all reports this car will be faster, better handling, less thirsty and safer than the commadore. Looks similar to the BF but it is an evolution not a copy and it looks hot not like the fat arsed and big eared front look of the commadore. Hopefully common sense prevails in which case it should outsell the Holden but unfortunately going on the comments here there is a lot of small minded brand loyalists. The V8's and the HSV is the only good thing about the commodore range.

    Sean of Canberra Posted on 19 February 2008 9:39pm
  • Can't believe the amount of people that get on here to whine about the best thing fords brought out in a long time, and yes, it has some characteristics of the BF MKII, they are both falcons! Perhaps if you hadn't already predefined your opinion before seeing the car, you mightn't be so soon to judge something you havn't seen in the flesh!

    Nick Posted on 19 February 2008 7:44pm
  • I was excited about the Ford as there needs to be competition. But I saw the photo and thought it was a Chinese Hyundia and not a Ford. and the engines are boring Motor has already provend Holden V8 6.0L put out 290+ alread but selling as 270kw, and Holdens is Alloy light Ford with still have heavy, the car is not going to handle. And the power claim is never as per the rest of the world messures. I hope is looks better in the flesh as the photos are horrible.

    Sean of Sydney Posted on 19 February 2008 7:36pm
  • I Honestly am shocked at the apperance of the headlights of this car! After the AU, Ford released the BA series, Which looked MUCH MEANER & extreemly similar face wise to the VY, the BA was a Masculine car. Did they let that crazy Designer back in the building? It is a 3-way design between the New Camry, the AU, & the BA falcon. I drive an AU and its FUGLY! but at a 3rd of the price of the equivelant year model commodore with more features! So far its been reliable, Ford have a strong design structure wise, and most TAXI'S that are falcons reach over 700K's on their original engine, I have seen one`s odometer roll over over a million, If they can build a car that can drive over 30 times around the world they they are doing somthing right. You would say i am in LIMBO with the whole argument. I wouldnt buy the new model, BUT you never know,,, POSSIBLY like the Mitsubishi 380, It might grow on me! Good Luck to Ford. D.Deadset Brisbane QLD.

    David Deadset of Brisbane QLD Posted on 19 February 2008 7:13pm
  • it funny how many holden fans are interested in the new falcon and are quick to comment on a car they will never buy. I currently work for holdens at elizabeth and i find the ve is cheap and nasty compared to previous models and is not even close to my xr6 turbo and i know for a fact if ford pull out of aust so will holden this means no more aussie made cars! the falcon looks like a great car and is on my shopping list the

    stev c of salisbury Posted on 19 February 2008 6:57pm
  • This is one of the best cars ford has ever designed. Futuristic, Modern, with more safety features than you can shake a stick at. Don't know why they still call the base model the XL. Still I'm not a base model guy, so that wont bother me. Come on Australia, celebrate Ford's commitment to your future motoring pleasure. Cant wait to test drive the new XR6 in New Zealand.

    Chris Abbott of Napier, NZ Posted on 19 February 2008 6:34pm
  • Oh dear, another design mish-mash reminscent of the AU debacle (though it would have to be really bad to beat that). Haven't Ford got any good designers or can't they afford to pay for anyone decent. Very disappointing~!

    william dhalgren Posted on 19 February 2008 5:17pm
  • Congratulions this has to be the car of the century. I am blown away by it. Ford have really excelled themselves in bringing out such a magnificent looking car. Refinement and upper class with Grunt. It's looks says keep out of my way

    Freddie Max of Southern Highlands Posted on 19 February 2008 4:22pm
  • VE Commodore is a success good luck ford

    holden fan Posted on 19 February 2008 2:45pm
  • If you saw the FG on the road and thought it was a BA perhaps you should get your eyes checked. As for the new American V6, I am not looking forward to losing the power and torque of the straight six. Clearly Holdens "American V6" shows the power sacrifices using an engine designed for front wheel drive cars.

    David Aldridge of Adelaide Posted on 19 February 2008 2:35pm
  • This car is ugly. The front looks like a Camry with those ugly, girly, slanted side indicators and slabby side look... contrast this with the Commodore whose accentuated grill and wheel arches give it a meaner, more masculine appearance. Well done Ford, another ugly one to rival the AU.

    Andrew Wilson of Sydney Posted on 19 February 2008 1:45pm
  • Just like the Mitsubishi 380, Ford have an opportunity to recreate a whole new car, setting standards for future shape and design and what do they do give us a face lift on the Falcon. The 380 did the same but ended up being a mediocre guppy fish look alike. Holden changed everything about the commodore, I am not a holden man but kudos to them for making a new car. M

    Mark Worsey Posted on 19 February 2008 1:27pm
  • Unfortunately, it's still a Ford.

    Neil Berry of Darwin Posted on 19 February 2008 1:15pm
  • I think its a step in the right direction for Ford. However, I heard build quality wont be up to scratch since Ford is trying to cost cut. Maybe, FPV could do something special to catch the new VE HSV's- they just dominate every test or review you read these days. If it happens again, I too will switch to HSV. The HSVs are just too good value for money. They are even well respected around the world.

    Phil of melbourne Posted on 19 February 2008 12:44pm
  • Im guessing the prefix FG stands for Fairly Good? Ford in America continue to bleed money at an alarming rate, so obviously Ford here only had a limited amount of money to play with, for an all new car it sure does like look like the old one with a Mondeo nose! Although Ford Australia continue to be the RWD centre of the Ford empire, I honestly dont think the Falcon is long for this world, the sales volumes for last year speak for themselves, most of the traditional buyers for the big cars are moving on in droves, even government fleets are now looking at green alternatives. Okay so Ford offer an LPG model but wheres the diesel option? That would have been a much more sensible option. Once the initial sales rush for the new model is over, it will be interesting to see where the monthly sales rate ends up, My tip? Get a brochure for the last Australian built Falcon while you can, they may be worth something one day.

    Autoloud of Brisbane Posted on 19 February 2008 12:37pm
  • What were they thinking??? After the VE release i was expecting good from Ford. It looks like they used left over parts from every crap car on the market and slapped them together. The interior hasn't changed dramatically. Just another face lift on a tired old car. Poor form!!!

    Paul of Sunshine Coast Posted on 19 February 2008 12:35pm
  • A new badge for FPV- about time. FPV should also get a new motto- like HSV "I just want one" The new VE HSV's still look better than the new FG FPVs though. The VE HSV's will also be too strong for the new FG FPV range in performance terms. The old 5.4L just wont stack up & the 4L turbo will probably be closer to the LS2 6L, but you wont get the V8 reliability & sound. The LS2 will produce consistent lap times, where the 6 Turbo will vary on temperature etc. Ford, please bring out a new V8- the current boss is way out of date & the performance does not match your claims.

    Thomas Posted on 19 February 2008 12:34pm
  • I have owned Fairmont Ghia's for the last 15 years, spanning 3 models so you might say I'm slight biased, however, the FG does look good to me in it's standard form and with the features included should attract buyers who haven't been members of the Blue Oval club previously

    Frank Skinner Posted on 19 February 2008 12:31pm
  • I'm excited. We all know that the VE is the best Holden ever produced. Now Ford is bringing out their best- since the BF struggled. Hopefully, It will be a close match. With FPV vs HSV, we all know that HSV will win that again, until Ford get a better engine package- which is not due till 2010.

    Henry Posted on 19 February 2008 12:25pm
  • New Falcon hey? ...Much ado about nothing, I say.

    Dave Greene of Sydney Posted on 19 February 2008 12:12pm
  • its such a shame to see ford spend so much time & money in developing the new ford but it just looks like the same as the bf. un like the ve which is a hole new design through from platform to sheet metal. but i must admit the new falcon does look nice an i am a holden lover my self but verry dissopointed in ford effort in making the new falcon new an different

    Barry Davis of perth Posted on 19 February 2008 12:01pm
  • Its great to see that Ford finnally did something about the ageing Falcon. Hopefully it will bring stiffer competition to the VE. I know it still looks like the old BF, but it does look more sharper now- a bit like the new Mondeo. You can see that they have copied alot of other manufacturers to get the latest look- which is a good thing. Who cares if the dash & interior look like a VE, at least they chose different colors to make it a bit different. Also, its good to see the old Boss 290 in the XR8. I know that in the real world, the 6L VE SS will beat it, but atleast Ford is trying this time. It is hard to beat other manufactures who spend money to make money, where Ford is still cutting corners & laying off staff. I can't see them match Holdens export program. With FPV, keep holding back & try to develop a better engine, because the predicted 310 kw current V8 & 300kw Turbo- that is still rumoured- will not beat the fastest Aussie production car (VE Clubsport R8). Magazine tests will prove that in the near future. The 302 kw BF Cobra struggled against the 20th Anniversary R8- a whole second slower in 0-100 & 1/4 mile. It even drinks 20L/100km! compared to the R8's 15L. Maybe Ford should come clean with the correct power output. i.e. instead of quoting the RAW 290kw, give us the real world output. HSV quote 307kw as final output, which in Ford terms will mean their RAW output should be 325kw+ Hence on the road, the HSV eats all FPV's & the humble SS eats the XR's. Come on Ford, stop lying to the public. We work hard for our money these days & their is nothing worse than forking out my hard earned on a top of the line FPV, where a VE R8 beats it effortlessly in all areas- Price, looks, handling, acceleration, quality, performance etc. A long way to go for the Ford camp, but only time will tell.

    Anthony Posted on 19 February 2008 11:49am
  • Chris, the outgoing Falcon has 190KW currently

    Alec Poulton Posted on 19 February 2008 11:38am
  • Honestly it looks the same as the last Falcoln very bland and very boring. I have never owned a Ford and never will they are a very boring car and well look the same almost every time. Time to change the look of your cars in this age Ford come on get some artistic adventure into ya.

    James G of Gold Coast, QLD Australia Posted on 19 February 2008 11:33am
  • I'm just happy to be the first to comment, great car, stunning features, a credit to the crew in Broady!

    Morris Boutsakis of Knox Posted on 19 February 2008 11:18am
Read all 54 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links