Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Saab denied bankruptcy protection

  • Carsguide
  • image

    Saab’s Trollhattan factory in Sweden has been stalled, and the company has been unable to pay its 3700 workers for the past two months.

Cash-strapped carmaker Saab has been denied bankruptcy protection.

The former General Motors brand has been catapulted closer to financial oblivion after being denied bankruptcy protection.

A Swedish court overnight denied the application for bankruptcy protection made by the company, which has been teetering on the brink of oblivion for more than a year after being sold by GM, with a failed bid to give it traction from supercar maker and new owner, Spyker.

Saab owner, Swedish Automobile – formerly Spyker Cars -- filed the voluntary  bankruptcy protection application in the District Court in Vanesborg, Sweden.

The application wasintended to protect Saab from creditors while giving it time to obtain further funding, start a reorganisation plan and restart production, while continuing being able to pay salaries.

Saab’s Trollhattan factory in Sweden has been stalled, and the inability to pay its 3700 workers for the past two months has led to bankruptcy threats from labour unions.

The company is seeking three months of court-appointed protection from its creditors while it awaits Chinese regulatory approval for its AUD$325 million joint-venture deal with Pang Da Automobile and Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile.

The bankruptcy protection and any court decision does not include Saab Australia, whose managing director Stephen Nicholls says the overnight news was an unwelcome surprise.

"Obviously the news is not something we were hoping to wake up to," Nicholls says. "We were hoping the court would grant this. But obviously we are going to appeal the decision, and it will take about a week to go through the process and lodge the appeal.

Nicholls says he doesn't have detailed information on why the application was refused, but that the appeal would make a stronger case.

"I haven't seen the judgement itself and I'm not qualified to comment on the details of the judgement. But we believe there must have been some shortcomings in the submission as we believe the case itself is sound," he says. "We just need to plug these gaps and supply extra information if required, and we're confident it will then be successful. The burden of proof is just to demonstrate we have the funds, and we're going to go back to the drawing board and this time overload them with information."

Nicholls says that the operations of Saab in Australia are not affected by the court decision. "Saab Cars Australia was explicitly excluded from the application -- as was the US and so on. But ultimately our  fate is linked to the paretent compay and we are carrying on trading, still honouring warranties and supplying parts.

"We're funded, we're trading --- in the meantime we carry on and wait for news from the frozen north."

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 3 comments

  • @ James of USA, I think you might want to get your facts right before you bag Saab out. GM was the one who sold Saab to the Spyker Cars for $82 million dollars, Spyker were the ones who saw the need for this car maker and took the risk. And there risk has not paid off. As a follower of the situation it seems like a lack of cash flow being the main reason for Saab to go down the drain. The EIB would not allow for the Russian investor to become a major shareholder due to his questionable business methods. The Chinese are willing to invest, but the Chinese government needs time to approve this as it wants Chinese companies to invest domestically. Unless some divine intervention happens, Saab will be dead in the next month, as soon as next week. And personally it will be a big loss to the automotive industry, as Saab has been always a quirky manufacturer whose recent cars, the 9-5 and the 9-4X, have been praised by the automotive industry. The plans for the new 9-3 and the 9-2, an Audi A1 rival would have sealed Saab as a great, yet small scale car maker. So, James of the USA, they do not deserve what is about to happen, and we can blame GM for running them into the ground.

    Mason94 Posted on 11 September 2011 9:32pm
  • James of USA - the SAAB story is a bit like the USA ... they build sub-par products that no one really wants and they are both being supported bt China. Good luck with your future projects!

    Tony of Melbourne Posted on 10 September 2011 7:15am
  • Inch by inch, nail by nail, Saab's fate is being sealed. Saab's survival would be an insult to what our school's teach us about economics, accounting and management. Saab turned down Russian and Chinese investors and for non-financial (read racial) reasons picked up Spyker instead. They are getting what they deserve.

    James of USA Posted on 09 September 2011 12:35pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links