Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Popular SUVs do badly in crush test

  • By Neil McDonald
  • Herald Sun
image The Volkswagen Tiguan has the strongest rated roof and the Kia Sportage the weakest.

Some of the most popular lifestyle off-roaders have fared poorly in new roof crush test ratings.

Of the 12 off-roaders tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in the United States just four earned a top rating of ``good'' and three were ``acceptable''.

The tests were designed by the institute to provide new roof strength ratings.

The Volkswagen Tiguan has the strongest rated roof and the Kia Sportage the weakest.

Roofs on the Honda CRV and Ford Escape are marginal, and the Kia's is poor.

The Tiguan, Subaru Forester, Jeep Patriot and a car sold in the US, the Honda Element, earn good ratings.

The Suzuki Grand Vitara, Toyota RAV4 and Mitsubishi Outlander rated acceptable.

The Chevrolet Equinox and Nissan Rogue, both just sold in North America, also rated acceptable.

A spokesman for the Australian New Car Assessment Program and RACV chief engineer, Michael Case, says the US test add another dimension to safety information for new car buyers.

He says ANCAP will be studying the findings.

“The roof crush rating is a useful measure of how the roof will perform in a real rollover,’’ he says.

“Rollover is the next area to go in developing tests and rating vehicles.”

He says ANCAP will need to look at the IIHS process, particularly how to assess it.

The new rating system is based on institute research showing that occupants in rollover crashes can survive better if their off-roaders have stronger roofs.

Vehicles rated good must have roofs that are more than twice as strong as minimum federal safety standards require.

``We anticipate that our roof strength test will drive improved rollover crash protection the same way that our frontal offset and side impact consumer test programs have led to better protection in these kinds of crashes,'' institute president Adrian Lund, says.

The Institute recognises that vehicle roof structures have become stronger over the past few years.
Part of the reason is that carmakers have made structural improvements to earn better front and side crash ratings.

Strong A and B pillars help prevent intrusion in these types of crashes and also help hold up the roof.

``It's not surprising that Volkswagen and Subaru earn good ratings in our new roof test because these carmakers were among the first to ace our front and side tests,'' Lund says.

In the United States more than 10,000 people a year are killed in rollovers.

When vehicles roll, their roofs often hit the ground with considerable force, deforming and crushing.

Stronger roofs crush less, reducing the risk that occupants will be injured by contact with the roof itself.

Stronger roofs can also prevent occupants, especially those not wearing seatbelts, from being ejected.
In the US, about 25 per cent of deaths in car and van crashes are rollovers but in off-roaders this jumps to 59 per cent.

The RACV’s Case says the incidence of rollovers in Australia is lower “but there is still a high chance of death or serious injury”.

In the institute's roof strength test, a metal plate is pushed against one side of a roof near the A-pillar.

To earn a good rating, the roof must withstand a force of four times the vehicle's weight before reaching 12cm of crush.
 
 

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 3 comments

  • surprises me you didn't bag the ford product

    ant crap media of aus Posted on 08 September 2009 3:22pm
  • SUV's aren't just a risk to everyone else on the road but to the passengers as well. The high riding position gives a false sense of security. "In the US, about 25 per cent of deaths in car and van crashes are rollovers but in off-roaders this jumps to 59 per cent." Thats an incredible statistic. Everyone that's thinking about buying an SUV or a 4WD(and doesn't need to) should be aware of this. Cam is right, ANCAP testing is very superficial and should only be taken as a guide. I should point out that Holden conducted 79 crash tests when they developed the VE, they even simulated it under-running a truck - you wont find that in ANCAP testing!

    Karl Posted on 01 April 2009 8:09pm
  • The usual story. Now that crash test laboratories are testing for roll over’s and crush tests for the roofs of cars, car companies will start testing for rollover protection like Mercedes has done since the 1940’s. Why would I buy from the car companies such as Ford, Toyota, Mazda, KIA, and Holden when they don’t test currently for rollover protection? Mercedes, BMW, AUDI and Volkswagen along with SAAB and Volvo have done it for decades. These cars makers are obviously running to make a profit, however they don’t see people as a number off the assembly line and take pride in making their cars safer and better. Volvo sends crash researchers out to real crash sites if it involves a Volvo car and collects data from the accident to report back to Volvo headquarters to determine how to make their cars safer. Toyota and others are all about the assembly line. Very impersonal. Although Mercedes, Volvo etc come off an assembly line as well, it doesn’t feel as such. More quality, strength and engineering. And as I have said you don’t have to spend over $30000 to get that feeling. The new golf is available for under $30000. Without sounding like a VW salesman struggling at present, people should wake up and realize that just because cars pass a front collision test does not mean they are a safe car.

    cam of brisbane Posted on 27 March 2009 9:32am

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links