Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

New Holden Commodore will slash fuel burn

  • By Mark Hinchliffe
  • The Courier-Mail
  • image

    The next-generation Holden Commodore will be more fuel efficient.

HOLDEN has confirmed there will be a next-generation Commodore in about two years with fuel economy similar to a Mazda6.

Holden managing director Mike Devereux told the first Alternative Fuels Summit in Brisbane yesterday that "the little old internal combustion engine has come a long way," pointing out that the average fuel efficiency of Australian vehicles has improved 15 per cent in the past decade.

"When we launched VE (Commodore) in 2006 we had about 10.8 litres per 100km in the Omega and over the last five or six years we've been able to take that down to 8.9. That's an 18 per cent improvement in fuel economy. It's largely due to our approach to things like direct injection, a smarter approach to the way air flows underneath the vehicle and tiny things like a change last year to the tailgate of the vehicle to make air flow more efficiently off the back of the vehicle.

So there are ways to improve the old internal combustion engine and right now our fuel economy targets of 8.9 we are trying to take down to the mid 8s as we go forward into our next gen of Commodore which is about two years from now. We are going to do that through significant light weighting, significant uses of things like aluminium for the panels, things like electronic power steering, looking at every component in the car and trying to make it in a much more lightweight fashion.''

Devereux also declared all V6 and V8 Commodores will be E85 compliant from next month.

That's not free,'' he says. "Holden has actually invested ahead of wide availability of the fuel (ethanol) across the country. I don't want you to cry for Holden because it's a strategic decision we're making, but it costs us about $100 per car to make those vehicles capable of running on E85. We put a stake in the ground and said every Commodore will be capable of running on E85.''

Devereux told the conference he was encouraged when he came to Australia 18 months ago (from his previous position as president and managing director of GM Middle East) by "how involved the local manufacturers were in promoting of alternative fuels''.

"Ford actually have a fantastic new LPI system in their Falcon and we are launching an all-new mono-fuel LPG system in our Commodore next year,'' he says.

For the first time, he confirmed that the mono-fuel Commodore will have the LPG tank under the floor instead of in the boot. He says the barriers to LPG acceptance include the loss of cargo space, the "bomb-like'' tank and the availability of LPG.

"For some people it's kind of disconcerting when you open up the back of the car you see this very high-tech looking tank full of LPG. Our Commodore early next year will take the tank out of the back of the vehicle and put it under the vehicle, freeing up that space. It's all about removing the barriers and the perception that 'oh my god, there's a bomb in the boot' thing and making LPG seem like a very reasonable, easy to adopt technology.''

He says there are also barriers to acceptance in the limited supply and the slow pumping process. Devereux also told the summit that Australia could become a world centre for LPG expertise over the next five years.

"It is incredibly naturally abundant and the technologies to run this fuel are all here in this country,'' he says.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 27 comments

  • You blokes like to get on your high horse and big note all the time,well the missus and me started with nothing,never had goverment handouts ,no stimulus payouts,just hard work and going without many things to save to buy a decent house, in a good area on the mid north coast east of bellingen on the seaboard,we do around 700ks a week to and from work,and we drive holden commodores,they never let us down and they are good on fuel and we look after them,around mid 8s to low 9s in fuel figures,so you know thats about it, I dont like driving little cars with sems and b-doubles on the pacific highway flying around and passing you,and the ve ute will more than hold its own in top company and so will the vz,so what have you got thats better for this purpose,give me a big holden or even a falcon any day, this is where they stand out!!!

    john foster of bellingen shire nsw Posted on 25 February 2012 11:15am
  • Jeeves of Hobart is lucky if he has a VE and hasn't gone through the timing chain dramas. Google that story. VE timing chain.

    steve elliott of frankston, Victoria Posted on 14 November 2011 6:19pm
  • The Falcons that have done 700,000 km's are on about their 7th engine (100,000 km for a Ford is good). The Commodore's are by far a better car than the unreliable crap Falcon. The Commodore can actually compete with other cars! The Falcon has to change to front-wheel drive because its not successful enough!

    Fred Elphick Posted on 04 September 2011 11:14pm
  • Got better things to spend my money on. Real estate, shares. Flying back to WA again on Tuesday for another mega-dollar job in oil and gas.

    Wild Man of Cyberspace Posted on 04 September 2011 7:51pm
  • Apparently ethanol is being phased out ... with the govt's excise tax on LPG will be increased due to them pulling out of their subsidised costs.... why would we want to buy these? I’ve owned many falcons and 2 SSV's so I’m no badge person... these manufacturers need to improve it even further so that all cars are at 5L/ 100km before any significant change can happen. They can do it. Old V8's 20-25L/100 now down to 14's...

    ray qld of qld Posted on 04 September 2011 6:59pm
  • I think the fuel "savings" will be all based on some test that in no way relates to real world use. This is why my 1997 EL Fairmont Ghia uses less fuel in the day to day than a new 3.0 Holden, yet the ADR tests (which are pretty close to what my Ford uses) claim the Holden should rump it in.

    real world figures of bris Posted on 04 September 2011 12:24pm
  • This article is a joke, Holden are not making the engine any more efficient, it is making the cars more aerodynamic. Which decreases fuel. It is written in the article. "We are going to do that through significant light weighting, significant uses of things like aluminium for the panels, things like electronic power steering, looking at every component in the car and trying to make it in a much more lightweight fashion." Yes by making a car lighter, with the same old engine you have a car that uses less fuel, well done Holden. At least you are catching up with Ford and will have a LPG Commodore, fuel cell under the seat is a good idea. A better idea would be to bring the Volt over here.

    Adam of Australia Posted on 03 September 2011 11:46pm
  • "It costs us about $100 per car to make these vehicles capable of running on E85". Rubbish, it will cost you nothing, you will add that to the purchase price!

    Revhead of QLD Posted on 03 September 2011 9:03am
  • That's nothing Jason of Melbourne! Most Falcon taxis will do over 700,000k's in their lifetime! My EB Fairmont did 650,000 and nothing fell off that, my mates Vs, what a heap of crap!

    Richard of perth Posted on 02 September 2011 2:27pm
  • Wildman and Jeeves must be related.

    Sumpguard Posted on 02 September 2011 1:52pm
  • Haha Wildman cant afford a new car haha. I have a name for you......!

    FIGJAM Posted on 02 September 2011 1:51pm
  • My Commodore has done over 200, 000 K and has not missed a beat. Looking forward to another 200, 000. I have a name for those who have their cars fall apart at 40 000. "Passion Fingers". Perhaps FIGJAM should consider this.

    Wild Man of Cyberspace Posted on 02 September 2011 11:31am
  • Robert of QLD many people get better than claimed averages from the VE (especially V8 drivers even though this article is V6 focused). Its just about selecting a car to suit your use, and driving style. And Gorden its not a big car at all, an SV6 wagon is just about the perfect size, feels like a smaller car to drive and very easy to park

    Mick of Melb Posted on 02 September 2011 10:56am
  • All well and good, however the fact remains that the Commodore has grown physically too large, it looks boofy and its fat. Trim the beast down and maybe even I would like it.

    Gordon Posted on 02 September 2011 9:12am
  • Martin, they actually got there first (think HSV), and you have been able to get a factory LPG VE also for quite some time. Though that is not quite as fancy as HSV's or Falcon's system. And David S, they also already have an e85 3.0 V6. And the others are coming soon.

    Jeeves of Hobart Posted on 02 September 2011 8:49am
  • Isn't it strange the fuel economy that a manufacturers claim doesn't seem to happen in real life?

    Robert of QLD Posted on 01 September 2011 8:57pm
  • Cut fuel cost's by 18%? i But that's not true Holden, all the independent testing showed the car's consumption is pretty much at par with the 3.8... Fords system is far superior anyway.

    Richard of PERTH Posted on 01 September 2011 8:00pm
  • @Jeeves haha just another inbred bogan with low standards.

    Sumpguard Posted on 01 September 2011 7:35pm
  • I've never bought a Holden, but if they can better the new Ford LPI setup, it will be under consideration.

    martin of newcastle Posted on 01 September 2011 5:46pm
  • As the weight of a car goes up (over its nameplates life, think VB to VE), and its ?fuel consumption? comes down, it would be interesting to see the how ratio between the two - Effectively the engine's fuel efficiency - has changed. I'd be expecting that new engines are vastly better, but the improvement is masked by the increase of the cars weight.

    Daniel of Australia Posted on 01 September 2011 2:53pm
  • Sold my old trusty 94 vr with 470'000Kms a few months back and nothing had fallen off that either.

    jason of melb Posted on 01 September 2011 2:24pm
  • The article says that the Commodore is down to 8.9l/100km but it is listed at 9.1l/100km. Maybe the MY12 is down to 8.9. Holden will have to give away the VE by 2013 as it is already showing its age so by 2013 it will be a Dinosaur.

    Pedro Posted on 01 September 2011 12:01pm
  • Great news, its not just talk of, lets get a diesel motor or stick a battery in it. Its one thing to reduce fuel consuption, but even better to look at proper alternatives such as LPG and Ethanol.

    Dave S Posted on 01 September 2011 11:50am
  • I find dual exhausts more useful than a full-sized spare anyday smile Besides, a proper exhaust system improves engine efficiency - reducing fuel consumption and your precious carbon foot print.

    alex Posted on 01 September 2011 11:48am
  • My Commodore has done 120,000kms, yet to see anything fall off it, or anything go wrong with it. P*ss off you badge snob!

    Jeeves of Hobart Posted on 01 September 2011 9:55am
  • Yet it will still fall to pieces at 40,000 kilometers.

    FIGJAM Posted on 01 September 2011 9:05am
  • Let me guess; half a spare wheel to save weight, but dual exhausts? Panels made from solidified electricity (coal fired no doubt) is a sure fire way to reduce the carbon footprint.

    Phil of Barossa Posted on 31 August 2011 11:50pm
Read all 27 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links