Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

ISOFIX call for safe child seats

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • image

    Aside from a few carmakers, the majority of importers are in favour of the ISOFIX standard being approved for Australia.

Child car safety is about to shift back into the spotlight thanks to a move to introduce an international safety system in Australia.

The ISOFIX system is a method to provide positive location for all types of child seats, from baby capsules to booster seats, and is being assessed by major motor clubs. Car companies are also pushing for ISOFIX acceptance in Australia.

The Australian Automobile Association says there is no major safety improvement from the ISOFIX system but admits it could have benefits in installation, cutting the high incidence of incorrect installation of child seats by parents.

The NRMA has recently begun a major investigation, including tapping overseas research on installation errors.

"The major issue with all child restraints is the mis-installation of restraints and incorrect seating of children in the restraint. ISOFIX addresses (but does not eliminate) the mis-installation issue, but is no better in regard to incorrect seating of children," says Jack Haley of the NRMA. "Australian child restraints perform as well as any other types anywhere in the world. There are many recorded instances of children properly seated in a child restraint properly installed surviving very high speed crashes where everyone else in the vehicle is killed."

Some carmakers dispute the safety figures, most notably Volvo of Sweden, but the majority of importers are in favour of the ISOFIX standard being approved for Australia. It could potentially be incorporated into a future Australian Design Rule change, as the Australian Standards committee is looking into the system

But there are a number of complications, from the design and location of ISOFIX mounts - a pair of D-shaped mounts at the junction of the backrest and base of the back seat - to a conflict between the systems used in Europe, Japan and the USA.

America has a hybrid system called Latch which uses the ISOFIX base mounts but includes a top-tether similar to the one required by law in Australia. "The latch system, with its non-rigid lower attachment system, provides no real benefit over the current Australian anchorage system," says Haley.

He and the AAA are concerned that there are only requirements for two ISOFIX locations in cars, which would reduce the carrying capacity for Australian families because it is impossible to fit three child seats or boosters across the back seat.

OPINION - Paul Gover

I am a fan of ISOFIX because it vastly reduces the chance of incorrect installation of a child seat. When I bought my first baby capsule in the UK, the salesperson at the Mothercare store said the company's research points to massive errors in installation.

ISOFIX also makes it quick and easy to switch the child restraint between cars, a major bonus for a Carsguide tester. The only cars I have driven without the ISOFIX brackets are either locally made or Japanese four-wheel drives, apart from - surprisingly - an Audi A5 Sportback.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 20 comments

  • The very fact that isofix is going to be incorporated into the Aus stds from 2013 says it all. Rear facing children up to 4 years old in a childseat scenerio is also unequivocally safer simply looking at the bio-mechanicals of the human body. In sudden / high impact de-acceleration events, the Longus colli muscle in conjunction with the Sternocleidomastoid muscle (both supporting neck area muscles), are poorly developed in the subject age group birth - 4 years. In conjunction with diffuse axonal shearing of the brain, (where the brain travels back and forth within the skull as a consequence of the head being thrown forward then back) rear facing your child is absolutely safer as the head restraint componant of the seat, elliviates somewhat the "whiplash" componant of a de-acceleration event. There is a reason why astronauts, upon re-entry are rearward facing. I am astounded that so called neuro specialists quoted in the discussions on the choice site in respect to the virtues of both isofix / rear facing, simply fail to grasp the basics. My advice, do your own research.

    Duncan Gray of Sydney Posted on 14 March 2012 1:18am
  • We returned from the US with our isofix carseats only to find they were "illegal" in australia. I am not going to put my kids safety at risk just because some moron bureaucrat got it completely wrong. It's as clear as day when I see my friend's car seats that my family is far safer. How can a belt around a seat with one anchor point be as safe as our US car seat with 3 anchor points? Call me a criminal but I care more about my kids safety than I do about complying with Australia's subpar carseat regulations.

    B Cruxton Posted on 25 February 2012 7:08pm
  • Aussie regulations and the rather stupid comments from Haley makes you wonder what's going on in this country. We brought our beloved isofix seat from Germany because we love the robustness over the flimsy Aussie products with their cumbersome leash system.

    Frank B of Sydney Posted on 27 November 2011 9:05pm
  • As a Senior Industrial Design Engineer, and recently a becoming a grand parent, I was amazed at the design compromise of using a seat/safety belt as part of the anchoring mechanism to anchor a child seat. ( This is not really what it is designed for ... disagree ? look at all the things you have to do to get it right. ) I then and have to ignore the ISOFIX points (structurally purpose designed) that are in both of our cars (one Japanese, one German) . Maybe it is because I work for a company that has world leading safety standards this looks so weird to me.

    Ken Grimm of Wollongong Posted on 17 July 2011 3:46pm
  • We imported our German made Mini when relocating from New Zealand and had to spend nearly $600.00 to install anchor points to comply with the Australian Design Rule, since, according to them the ISOFIX system is not good enough! We had no choice, of course, because otherwise we would not have been able to register our car with Vic Roads. We have complied with everything, but I am very disappointed that we were forced to install and pay for a inferior safety system!!! I wonder whether we would be entitled to a compensation once the ISOFIX system becomes a law... What a crazy way to protect the local automotive industry - children's safety is at stake here. Or have the ADR people been asleep for decades?

    Irmantas from Melbourne Posted on 09 July 2011 10:09pm
  • The parochial and insular attitude of the Australian car industry defies belief! Australia has signed the WTO treaty and should immediately allow the inherently safer Isofix seats. If its suitable for something as important as our food where standards are harmonised with EU and US standards then the same should apply to child restraints here. This looks like a non-tarrif trade barrier if I ever saw one!

    ROBERT JOHN STEELE of Sydney Posted on 03 July 2011 3:00pm
  • As a German-Australian dual-citizen with a young family and occasional family travel to the other side of the globe, I can only shake my head at the Australian insular attitude. The Australian standard is proprietary, making installation difficult for non-locals, and less safe, as can be gleaned by the numbers. It can only be either a protectionist measure that provides someone somewhere in politics with kick-backs or lack of intelligence. I am sure it is not the second. I have worked for VW and ISOFIX has been designed as a solid and open standard, which increases safety and lowers cost by providing an open and transparent market. Good for the customer. Bad for cronies.

    Joern Guy Suess of Brisbane Posted on 25 February 2011 3:35pm
  • As a parent I do heavily support on ISOFIX as it is proven the safest system, I graduated as an Industrial designer 10 years back plus a car enthusiast I do total not surprise the local authorities didn't put the red label over the ISOFIX due to a few factors; cost, testing and pride (which as they claim the Latch system is as safe as ISOFIX with the high installation error rate + wear and tears due to loading in boot space for hatch and wagon which are common Aussie family vehicle).

    Sin of Sydney Posted on 29 January 2011 3:43am
  • As an Australian living in London with the brilliant ISOFIX system in use for our two sons, I am always astounded when I visit Sydney and have to deal with the unsafe, hard to install Australian approved car seats. Being very familiar with the European systems, I just do not accept for a second the claim that Australian systems are as safe as European or US systems that use ISOFIX. A side impact in a non ISOFIX Australian tether seat cannot possibly be as safe as an ISOFIX seat. The State and Federal Governments must stop the protectionist nonsense and start thinking about young Australian lives. The current system presents unacceptable risks to children, and it is a matter of time before a family sues a government in Australia for the archaic law leading to the serious injury or death of a child.

    S Scholfield Posted on 27 December 2010 10:18am
  • I currently have non ISOFIX child restraints in our two cars but go to extremes to make sure they are in there nice and tight. It takes me about 15 minutes of sweat on each seat before I'm happy with them, not to mention checking and tightening every few weeks. To tell you the truth, i don't trust my parents or parents in law to fit these non ISOFIX seats correctly so I've imported (at great expense) an ISOFIX base and seat set up from Europe which fits easily and safely into their European cars. I only know of one other person who goes to the extremes i do to fit these non ISOFIX restraints properly, and it's a mate of mine, we frequently have discussions about how backward Australia is with their rulings on no ISOFIX. Wake up Australia, look at the statistics, Australian rulings on child restraint fitting may be just as safe, i don't dispute that, but how many of them are fitted properly and how many parents really understand how important it is until it's to late! SAVE LIVES, INTRODUCE ISOFIX TO AUSTRALIA NOW!

    Brett McGrath of Mentone, Vic. Posted on 11 December 2010 1:11pm
  • Incorrect installation is a real concern. After fitting my child?s safe n sound car seat, following the instructions carefully, I was concerned by how loose the seat felt when jiggled. So I took the seat to be professionally installed, they added a buckle to the car seat belt to hold it taught. This extra buckle was not mentioned in the instruction manual. I felt sick that I had put my child at risk by using an incorrectly fitted car seat.

    Carrie of sydney Posted on 11 October 2010 9:07pm
  • I can only say that we have had the ISOFix is without a shadow of a doubt absolutely fantastic and simple but as solid as the rock of Gibraltar! I am ashamed to have to come back home to Australia and have to put my boy at risk from myself fitting our safe & sound car seat. For my own piece of mind I take our Aussie seat to a "specialist" baby car seat installer BUT I have to take it back to him every 2 weeks as it works itself loose. This was supposed to be the best carseat on the market - What a joke! When is Australian standards going to wake up to themselves and approve ISOfix and give Aussies a choice in the safety of their own children. Aprarently one of the guys who sits on the AS committee has or owns one of the big manufacturers of Aussie car seats and this is where the blockage is!!! How disgusting is that. We are returning back to Australia for good next month and are considering running the gauntlet and using the ISOfix car seat purely from a safety aspect but find it appalling that we are forced to do this in the name of safety for our son. WAKE UP AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS AND APPROVE ISOfix

    Teasdale of Dubai,London then Sydney Posted on 11 October 2010 6:28pm
  • Australia is so far behind the rest of the World with regard to child safety.IsoFix fas been proven beyond doubt in the USA,Europe and our neighbours NZ as the safest.One must ask is there a commercial reason why they are trying to prevent IsoFix in Australia.It will eventually come in but at what cost.

    Julian Kelly of Sydney Posted on 09 October 2010 3:43pm
  • Only 30% of child seats are installed correctly when using an adult seat belt, 96% when using the ISOFIX system!* * Source: The German Insurance Institute GDV, Group 1 Enough said!!!! Gotta wonder why all the motorists organisations who supposedly represent us have been so slack in raising this issue but then they are just as slack as the government departments in reality.

    Derek of Drummoyne of Drummoyne Posted on 27 July 2010 9:44am
  • There are two misconceptions in this article which need addressing if we are to make a fully informed decision about this issue. The first is that LATCH (the non-rigid US system) provides no benefit. It actually improves the likelihood of correct installation (due to making it much easier) - a huge benefit. The second is that three car seats cannot be used if cars have ISOFIX points. It is true that if the two ISOFIX positions in most cars were in use, a third restraint would be unlikely to fit between them. However, as most (if not all) ISOFIX/LATCH seats also allow for seatbelt installation, adding a 3rd restraint would simply mean that one would have to install each seat with seatbelts. That doesn't suddenly make the seats unsafe, as that is how Australians currently install their seats anyway. Saying that ISOFIX won't work for Australians because too many of us need 3 or more restraints is just a cop-out. Australia is resting on 20+-year-old laurels when it comes to child restraints. We need to admit that perhaps the rest of the world has something useful to offer us.

    Janet M of Sydney Posted on 21 July 2010 2:29pm
  • I am an Australian living in Belgium and we are using a Maxi-Cosi brand category 0 seat, rear-facing with ISOFIX. We have just purchased the BeSAFE X3, Category 0-1, (made in Norway) to keep our little girl rear-facing with ISOFIX until she is 18kg or approximately 4 years of age. I have read heavily on the subject and rear-facing for as long as possible with ISOFIX is the safest option. I am disgusted that ISOFIX is not available in Australia. Like many others, I have written to our Minister of Transport and surprise, surprise, I never received a reply. We intend to return to Australia to live and yes, I will be brining my ISOFIX-equipped car seat with me. We will purchase a car that has ISOFIX points. As a responsible parent, I want the safest possible option for my child and any future children we have. If I get stopped by police for the lack of a top-tether, let them take me to court. I will ask the court to prove that what I'm using is less safe than the Australian option. Let's hope that in the meantime ISOFIX is finally approved in Australia - the country is lagging behind! If anyone wants to know more from someone who is using ISOFIX, I'm happy to be interviewed.

    Aileen of Brussels, Belgium Posted on 17 July 2010 3:44am
  • Anyone serious should check out Volvo for how they do child safety. If anyone has put thought into it, they have. Today Tonight has done several stories where they talked about the safety systems with child seats and restraints and how Volvo have covered it. When the NSW Roads Minister was asked about it he actually thought these were legal in an interview until one of his minders told him otherwise. If the legislators don't know what's legal and what's not, how can we expect progress?

    Nathan of Sydney Posted on 06 July 2010 5:24pm
  • One standard fitting system for child restraints/booster seats in ALL cars is safe and used all over Europe. Why are we not adopting the system? Because it's the usual government red tape... 'all too hard' department... time for a break and a good lay down... my head hurts from shuffling papers.

    ALAN FRENCH of Brisbane QLD Posted on 04 July 2010 1:14am
  • Having investigated for our first baby - ISOFIX would make life a lot better for us as we have a range of cars that we drive on a regular basis.

    Duncan of Melbourne Posted on 02 July 2010 4:36pm
  • Chrysler Jeep has had this system in all its cars for many years. Why has it taken so long for Australia to look at this?

    Ian Fletcher of Doncaster Posted on 02 July 2010 11:42am
Read all 20 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links