Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Falcon FG: will it sink or float?

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
image Ford's future is on the line with the new Falcon FG series.

Ford put its Australian future on the line with the unveiling of a make-or-break new Falcon.

Sales of the family Ford have been falling for six years and hit a 40-year low last year, but the company is confident the good-looking newcomer can reverse the trend and give it a genuine rival to the top-selling VE Commodore.

It has spent more than $500 million on the car, called the FG Falcon, and renewed everything from the body to the cabin and suspension.

A V6 engine will also be added in 2010.

There is still no firm sale date and prices were not revealed, although the preview showcased the FG headliners and also the high-performance hero from Ford Performance Vehicles.

The Falcon arrives just a fortnight after Mitsubishi decided to close its local manufacturing operation, and with the Federal Government about to begin the review of its motor industry plan beyond 2010, including tariff levels and investment support.

But new Ford Australia president Bill Osborne, who arrived less than a week ago from Ford Canada to take the top job, denied the Falcon was a crunch car.

The FG Falcon has a new look and the other big change is the model naming, with the traditional Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia labels disappearing.

The FG range for 2008 is the basic Falcon XT, followed by the newly named G Series — a G6, G6E and G6E Turbo — and then the familiar XR sports models.

Safety is high on the list of improvements and every FG petrol sedan will have ESP stability control as standard, while utes will have anti-skid brakes and XR utes pick-up traction control.

The new Falcon will make its first public appearance at the Melbourne Motor Show from February 29.

Full details on the FG Falcon:

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 18 comments

  • People are buying medium SUVs (I have a Territory for a number of reasons), but I'd consider a Falcon (I think the FG will be a great car) but why didn't Ford incorporate more of the Terri's practical interior? With 3 kids, you need door pockets and drink holders, but they're missing from the Falcon in the rear. With a more practical interior, I think they'd sell a lot more. Come on Ford, it can't be that tricky, can it?

    Dave Cecil of Gold Coast Posted on 03 April 2008 8:21pm
  • I love how the "armchair experts" have a negative view of a product even before checking out all the specs and design details, or seeing, or driving one for themselves. A well handling,roomy,safe family sedan that can tow up to 2300kg (not all of us want or need a 4wd to tow with now and then) with the best torque in its class and running costs similar to a Camry / Aurion, and people bag it! PS: I find it more unacceptable that a Camry which is smaller, lighter bodied, smaller in capacity and less capable (eg: towing) can only manage 9.9L/100km, whereas a larger / heavier more capable car such as Falcon can manage 10.5L/100km in 4litre, 5 spd auto (base model) form.

    Andrew Posted on 11 March 2008 11:34pm
  • Mark, what is todays market? Small suv's that have less cabin space and the dynamics of dinosaur? "Imported" large luxury cars that guzzle like no tommorrow and are far more expensive or 4 cylinder buzz boxes that P platers drive around 30km over the speed limit with no go and poor protection? The best compromise IS the Falcon and Commodore option in Australia, only I consider the new FG to be a lot better looking car than the VE.

    Stephen Posted on 06 March 2008 8:47pm
  • The FG Falcon will be COTY for 2008. It is not a rehashed BF Falcon. The car has been redesigned and the engineering updated to a world class standard. Industry specialists believe the car will come close to a 5 star safety rating. Ford have included the Territory's excellent Virtual Pivot Front suspension and redesigned the widely lauded Control Blade IRS. The FG will have effortless performance - while consuming 0.6L/100 km(10.5L) more than a Camry(9.9L)! Those figures lay to rest the nonsense about the car being irrelevant in an era of higher fuel prices. If the build quality is as world class as the car then this FG is a winner.

    Luke of Sydney Posted on 02 March 2008 10:27pm
  • I have owned commodores (since the VB) Fairlanes and Fairmonts. I currently drive a 5.7 VT Series 2 Berlina (an awesome car which averages 11.5l/100 and on a trip 10l/100 over 7000km nice). I will definately would look at the Ford fairmont as a stylish replacement (I tow a van). I find the VE a slab sided backward step from the VT-Vz range and in a word butt ugly.

    John Fuller Posted on 25 February 2008 1:09pm
  • What a dud! $800M to produce the old Falcon with some new panels? Where's the exciting cutting edge technology? The fuel sipping diesel option? This thing is a plastic fantastic joke, and all the reviews, all read the same .. Ho-hum, Yawn .. add in the standard Ford slap-em-together build quality, and you can see why Falcons and Holdens came in below Korean crap in the latest JD Power car quality survey.

    Ron N of Perth, W.A. Posted on 23 February 2008 1:08pm
  • The new Falcon looks great and as a BA Fairmont owner, I find it very hard to compare the Ford with the competition. It is smooth, quiet and goes about its business effortlessly both traffic & freeway with the best seats of any comparative large car that I've been in. Fuel consumption is high. Falcon or Commodore. Unless you spend all your time on freeways you won't get the quoted consumption figures. But then compared to the competition, I'll pay for the extra litre/100

    Leon Isaacs of Penrith Posted on 22 February 2008 4:10pm
  • There is just way too much negativity on a car that is as fuel efficient as the Aurion, even though it has half a litre more engine displacement and is 150kg heavier. Its also the best in its class in terms of towing capabilities, engine performance, ZF-6 speed transmission, etc. The list goes on. As for a desiel version, how much do you expect to save on petrol in any given year? please consider the fact that desiel is more expensive to buy, and you just don't have the same performance as a petrol engine. The fact is that the falcon has world class engines and drivelines. what more can you ask for? On a side note, sign me up for a new XR6 turbo to replace my VE SS. Now where can you find a car with that much power and only uses 11.7l / 100km? no where. PS karl, please test drive one. Then ask where did all that money go. I'm sure you'll be suprised.

    Danny of Melbourne Posted on 21 February 2008 11:55am
  • New Falcon looks OK and and will drive nicely. Will I replace my current Falcon with one, No it is too heavy on fuel!. Steve Atkin is right diesel is the future until hydrogen gets here in 20 years or so. Now a 450 NM version with around 8 litre/100km I would be very tempted, and i know there would be thousands of farmers who would as well. As for Ford's comments that diesel is a radical solution Wake up before you hit the iceberg. As Kark says hard to see where the $800 mil has been spent.

    Peter webb Posted on 21 February 2008 11:19am
  • The new commodore was a poorly built lemon with a swimsuit on.(can anyone say RECALL?) Logan, Logan, Logan. Are we really going to listen to rubbish like the above.

    Peter of Hervey Bay Posted on 21 February 2008 10:33am
  • The new Falcon is doomed even before it is released. Nobody wants a large thristy car anymore, they are just socially unacceptable and so out of step with the times. Worst for Ford is the new Falcon doesn't look any different to the current one, and the current one has tanked and fallen out of the top ten sales.

    Dean Hamilton of Newcastle Posted on 21 February 2008 12:00am
  • Why all the negativety? Its a great looking car that will sell well. Its the australian public that needs to take a good look at themselves, too busy trying to keep up with the jones"s and buying the latest germany or japan has to offer when we make two of the best family sedans in the world. C"mon Australia support your local Manufacturers an we will prosper.

    Vasilios Pavloudis of Adelaide Posted on 20 February 2008 10:41pm
  • $800 million for a car that looks almost the same, uses almost the same fuel, has only abit more power (but that wasn't an issue anyway), can't be made in left hand drive form but its now heavier than a VE. Where did the $800 M go? (hopefully this wont be another mitsubishi 380)

    karl Posted on 20 February 2008 6:18pm
  • This will take the blue oval to new heights.... not

    Tom Gorman Posted on 20 February 2008 5:59pm
  • I think at the current point in time Holden will outsell the Falcon in a big way, considering that Holden have a range of sedans, wagons and utes and a long-wheelbase Statesman - that are set up for LHD and widely exported. By contrast Ford's only got a sedan and ute (and previous generation wagon with an outdated suspension setup) that are marketed in Australia and New Zealand... And they haven't got upmarket Fairmont variants, only a 'sporting' 'G6' series...

    Joh Posted on 20 February 2008 5:57pm
  • Lets face it, if the new commodore sold well then the new falcon should outsell it by a country mile. The new commodore was a poorly built lemon with a swimsuit on.(can anyone say RECALL?) Oh and diesel technology is actually no better than unleaded, infact any power to consumption ratio diesel always loses. What advantage would a diesel motor be in a falcon?...er...none. If anyone wants to get serious about fuel then hydrogen is the only real option for the future. Take a look at ford's concept F250 Superchief.. 3 fuel options and better economy than any six we have on the market. Do some research before you go posting dumb comments.

    Logan of melbourne Posted on 20 February 2008 5:51pm
  • The Ford FG will be remembered as the Ford Glug glug glug as it sinks beneath its own weight and irrelevance in todays's market. Ford supporters will nash their teeth at this very notion but regrettably there will not be enough Ford supporters actually putting their money where their mouth is and purchasing one of these beached whales. Sad for our car industry but that is simply reality.

    Mark McDonough of Sydney Posted on 20 February 2008 4:05pm
  • Great looking car, but for god sake Ford Australia, why are you so backward on putting in a high output common rail turbo diesel? Wake up and get with the times & cut the excuses, the Falcon will be dead in less than 2 years without a fully fuel efficient engine, & lets face it , diesel technology is way ahead of petrol technology. I find it hard to believe that you can't or won't source a diesel or 2 from a parent company, especially now that Holden have signed off on a VM unit for the Commodore. Come on Ford, tke the challenge.

    Steve Atkin Posted on 20 February 2008 3:39pm
Read all 18 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links