Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

380 not quite the saviour

  • The Advertiser
image Former chief executive Tom Phillips unveils the Mitsubishi 380 at Tonsley Park in September, 2005.

The locally-built Mitsubishi 380 was promoted as the saviour for the Adelaide plant but sales failed to live up to expectations.

The car, first produced in 2005, was seen as a measure of whether the plant could produce profitable vehicles, however, bad timing and poor export figures led to unsatisfactory sales results. The V6 four-door 380 was produced as a replacement for the Mitsubishi Magna.

At the time of the car's release, car industry experts and economists claimed the success of the 380 would determine the outcome of the company's future in Australia.

Australian Institute for Social Research executive director John Spoehr said the 380 was well designed and built - $600 million was spent developing the vehicle - but rising petrol prices and poor exports crippled sales.

“Mitsubishi placed a great deal of importance on the 380 as a transition to a more secure future for the Adelaide plant,” he said.

“The difficulty for these things is the lead time for establishing a new model is so long that circumstances changed by the time the 380 came on to the market. “Large cars at a time of rising petrol prices were becoming increasingly unpopular in the Australian market.”

Mitsubishi sales grew by 20 per cent last year but the 380 bucked the trend selling only 10,942 units, a drop of 11.9 per cent over its 2006 tally. Mr Spoehr said the Japanese company needed to see strong continued sales growth of the 380 to have its “faith” restored in building cars in Australia. “Not being able to secure sufficient export volumes really made it impossible for the 380 to be the leader it needed to restore the faith in the parent company,” he said.

Comments on this story

Displaying 2 of 2 comments

  • The market needed another large petrol powered 6 cylinder like it needed a hole in the head and the 380 was just like another Leyland P76 really - just the wrong car in the wrong place at the wrong time ! plus the thing was ugly as outside and sombre and dull inside (steering wheels is truly hideous) - surely some of that 600 ml should have spent on at least makng sure it looked good ? cheers

    Damian of sydney Posted on 07 February 2008 6:47pm
  • The decision to close Mitsubishi plant in Aust had been expected for a long time. It's sad for the workers and car industry in Aust. But it was not helped by the fact that the 380 was developed from a car destined for the US market right down to its look. It's ugly, not economical. It was designed for the worng market. It would have helped its case had it been exported like Camrys and Commodores. MMAL should have considered to build the smaller Lancer and Colt here instead of a big car like that. It was a shortsighted decision by MMAL and I want to know how much tax payer money had been poured in over the years to prop up an unprofitable business.

    Paul H Posted on 05 February 2008 8:43pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links