Skip navigation
21180 Visits Today

Used car review Toyota Corolla 2007-2010

  • image

    The Corolla is a no-brainer, with good reliability, quality and safety.

Graham 'Smithy' Smith reviews the used Toyota Corolla 2007-2010: its fine points, flaws and what to watch for when buying it.

The transformation of the Corolla introduced in 2007 reflected the changes taking place in the market at the time when small cars were in demand like never before.

People were, and still are, downsizing to more efficient cars while still demanding they satisfy their every motoring need. It's a long time since small cars could simply rely on being cheap and cheerful with good fuel economy and be excused for lacking in features or refinement.

These days they have to deliver on all fronts and the new Corolla was positioned to do just that. There were two body styles offered, a five-four hatch and a four-door sedan, with a choice of models ranging from the Ascent to the Ultima.

When compared to the old model the new one was substantially longer and wider, as well as being a smidgeon higher. It was bigger all round. The mechanical package was what you would expect of the class, from the thoroughly decent 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine to the competent front-wheel drive chassis with independent suspension.

If it lagged behind in any area it was probably the transmissions, for while there was a new six-speed manual, the auto option was a dated four-speed unit that was a gear short of what we needed to extract the best from the engine. If the new Toyota followed a fairly traditional, conservative path the new Corolla sported a new look that was hailed at the time.

As much as it was welcomed it was still a conservative looking car, with a wide appeal across the ages, from young to old. That has always been the Corolla's strength and it remains so.

It's an important factor when it comes to selling the Corolla, with such broad appeal the range of potential buyers is similarly wide.

On the road the Corolla performed well, its tight chassis holding the road nicely for a secure and reassuring drive.

IN THE SHOP

Toyota has a deserved reputation for the quality of its build, and its reliability once in service, and that is reflected in the overall level of satisfaction of its owners and the resale they achieve.

That doesn't mean they don't break down or have frustrating problems, but any problems the Corolla does have tend to be specific and not endemic. Like all cars maintenance is key to a long and trouble-free run, so always check for a service record confirming that all serviced have been done as specified.

Brake wear and tyre wear, problems with some makes, isn't a problem with the Corolla, both brakes and tyres last as one would expect.

IN A CRASH

Safety has traditionally been a concern for small car buyers, but the Corolla scrubs up pretty well on that front. With front, side and head airbags it is well equipped for the crunch when it comes. To get the benefit of electronic stability control you have to look for the 2009 and later models.

UNDER THE PUMP

Toyota claimed 7.3 L/100 km for the manual models, and 7.7 L/100 km for those equipped with the auto, average numbers for the class. Carsguide road testers reported 9.1 L/100 km when evaluated in 2007.

AT A GLANCE

Price new: $20,990 to $30,990 
Engine: 1.8-litre 4-cylinder, 100 kw/175 Nm
Transmission: 4-speed auto, 6-speed manual, FWD
Economy: 7.2 L/100 km
Body: 5-door hatchback, 4-door sedan
Variants: Ascent, Conquest, Levin SX, Levin ZR, Ultima
Safety: Ascent hatch 4-star ANCAP, all other models 5 stars.

EXPECT TO PAY

$16,500 to $19,000 for the Ascent hatch; $17,000 to $21,500 for the Conquest hatch; $19,000 to $22,000 for the Conquest sedan; $19,500 to $22,500 for the Levin SX; $21,000 to $25,000 for the Levin ZR; $21,000 to $25,000 for the Ultima sedan.

VERDICT

Does everything pretty well, build quality is good, reliability admirable. Sensible choice.

4 stars

image image
  • Build quality
  • Resale
  • Reliability
  • Roomy
  • 4-speed auto

ALSO CONSIDER

  • SUBARU IMPREZA - 2007-2010: All-wheel drive is a winner, but dull performance, excessive noise, and dated interior disappoint. 3 stars. Pay $15,000-$25,500.
  • HOLDEN VIVA - 2007-2009: Modest performance, general lack of road feel, and average build quality detract from its roomy cabin and value-for-money pitch. 3 stars. $13,000-$16,500.
  • MAZDA3 - 2007-2010: The market leader delivers good all-round performance with attractive looks, decent engines, nicely refined. 4 stars. $19,000-$32,000.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 4 comments

  • Hi there, Please could I request a review on the 2012 Levin ZR by Toyota.

    Boris of Melbourne Posted on 25 March 2012 1:21pm
  • Agree. I'm very light on the pedal. That's how the car manufacturers do to record their car consumptions. If you've a heavy foot, you'll never get their figures.

    sean t Posted on 16 March 2012 4:01pm
  • Test conditions vary from journalist to journalist (mine, for example always includes the same stretch of winding hills) so fuel economy will vary accordingly. But for the record, your 2003 Corolla wagon would have been a little lighter than the 2007 hatch, so it may be simply down to driving. Kudos to you for being steady on the pedals. – Karla Pincott

    Yvette Posted on 16 March 2012 2:45pm
  • "Carsguide road testers reported 9.1 L/100 km when evaluated in 2007". How did they test the car? I've a 2003 Corolla Wagon with 144,000km (older car, bigger body) and most of the time carrying more than just the driver and for 5 months of recording, the consumption is 8.4l/100km (and most of them are in stop/start condition). If you want to know how to waste petrol, just ask the Cars Guide testers..............................

    sean t Posted on 16 March 2012 12:41pm
Read all 4 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.