Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Used car review: Subaru Outback 1996-2002

  • By Graham Smith
  • Herald Sun
image Photo Gallery

Graham 'Smithy' Smith reviews the used Subaru Outback 1996-2002, its fine points, its flaws and what to watch for when you're buying it.

Holden has caught on, so has Ford, but both have got a long way to go if they want to catch up with Subaru who hit the market in 1996 with the first family wagon with the ability to go off-road. As Holden rolls out the Commodore-based Adventra all-wheel drive wagon, and Ford makes noises about its all-new Territory which is due in 2004, Subaru’s Outback continues to rack up sales in a market segment that shows no sign of slowing.

The idea of blending a regular family wagon with all-wheel drive makes a lot of sense. You get the roominess of a wagon, the dynamic safety of all-wheel drive, and the ability to explore bush tracks in the one package. The great news is that you don’t have the massive size and on-road clumsiness of the bigger four-wheel drive wagons.

MODEL WATCH

Subaru made no bones about the Outback when it was launched in 1996. It was a Liberty wagon put on a course of steroids, they admitted, but it was conceived to offer buyers the flexibility of a four-wheel drive without the downsides of size, compromised safety and sloppy chassis dynamics. It was perfect for the buyer who wanted an all-round vehicle with reasonable off-road capability without sacrificing the comfort and style that goes hand-in-hand with a passenger cars.

It was clear from the outset that the Outback was a jacked-up Liberty wagon. It looked like a Liberty, but with increased ground clearance, although the large front and rear overhangs rather limited its approach and departure angles.

Add to that the lack of low range gearing and no real protection for vulnerable components underneath and you get the idea that the Outback wasn’t intended to go deep into the bush. Subaru admitted as much at its launch when it quoted data that said as many as 95 per cent of new off-roaders never leave the black top.

To give it the ability to go off-road Subaru raised the suspension by 35 mm and fitted some 70-series tyres to 15-inch rims, which resulted in 200 mm ground clearance and made it comparable to many more serious off-roaders.

The suspension was also retuned to handle the tough stuff, with retuned shocks and springs, and increased wheel travel, which made it quite comfortable even when traversing some relatively rough forest tracks.

But it was at its best on slippery surfaces when its all-wheel drive and passenger car chassis dynamics combined to give it an assurance and level of safety unheard of in an off-roader.

Power came from Subaru’s 2.5-litre horizontally-opposed double overhead cam four cylinder engine. Boasting a modest 115 kW and 221 Nm it was sufficient to give the Outback good performance without ever threatening to leave you with whiplash.

More performance was unleashed in 2000 when the H6 was released with the 3.0-litre engine, which delivered 154 kW and 282 Nm, but ran on PULP.

Initially there was no choice of gearbox, it came with a four-speed auto and that was it. Still, it shifted smoothly, and there a choice of ‘power’ or ‘regular’ shift modes, and a ‘hold’ button that would lock the trans and control up or down shifts. The choice was expanded to include a five-speed manual with dual-range four-wheel drive in 1997, which added to its off-road prowess if you were serious about going bush.

Inside there was plenty of room even for tall occupants with generous front and rear seat leg and head room, plus generous load space in the rear. The 70/30 split-fold rear seat added to the capacity and flexibility of the interior, and there was a retractable blind to cover the contents in the load area.

The interior was also well equipped with lots of knickknacks, like delay courtesy lights, cup holders, and a powerful sound system.

Two models were launched. The regular model which came with alloy wheels, ABS, remote central locking, cruise, fog lamps, power windows and mirrors, roof racks, and velour trim. On top of that the Limited got standard air-con, dual airbags, leather and wood grain, and CD sound.

ON THE LOT

Early Outbacks, those between 1996 and 1998, can be had for $17,000-$24,000, add $1000 for a manual, and $3000 if you want a Limited.

For later cars, 1998-2002, pay between $20,700 and $32,500 for manuals, add $1000 for an auto and $3000 for a Limited.

The zippy 3.0-litre H6 runs between $36,500 and $44,000.

IN THE SHOP

Subarus are generally bulletproof in the mechanical department. Subaru dealer servicing tends to be on the high side, so check service record carefully to see that it has been done, and who has carried it out.

Although few Outbacks travel off-road, apart from the odd foray down a gravel road, look for signs of bush bashing anyway. Take a look underneath to signs of impact that might have damaged exposed componentry. Get it up on a hoist if you’re not sure.

Tyres can wear out quite quickly, particularly on the hotter H6 model, and 50,000 km is not unusual. Brakes also need doing around 50,000 km.

OWNERS SAY

Outback owners are generally lavish with their praise of the car. They particularly like the combination of the wagon size and flexibility with the safety of the all-wheel drive system. Many say it’s great for towing, and a number have towed pop-tops and campers around the country on their holidays.

One, Darren Wilkie, has been off roading in his and says it performed exceptionally, handling creek crossings, steep heavily rutted tracks, and soft sand with surprising ease.

Main gripe is the headlights, which a number of owners say are “poor” to the extent that they have replaced them with more powerful units.

LOOK FOR

• good build quality

• tough, reliable mechanical package

• roomy accommodation for family

• safety of all-wheel drive

• handling on slippery roads

• surprising off-road capability

RIVALS

• RAV4 – 1996-2002 – $11,100-$31,700

• Subaru Forester – 1996-2002 – $13,100-$32,800

• Honda CR-V – 1996-2002 – $15,500-$27,800

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 6 comments

  • I have a 01 outback limited I bought it with 214000 on it everyone said the k;s were to high I have now done a further 30000 ks and has not cost me a cent uses no oil or water and runs great it would be the best 2nd hand car I have owned

    carl smith of Australia Posted on 01 July 2011 11:35am
  • I bought a 2001 outback H6, it had 180000kms clocked up, i bought it for the fact it had a 3 year warrenty. Few days after i bought it there was a shudder in the transmission, i took it into subaru and they said it was a viscous coupling and the best thing to do is change the whole transmission worth $3,500. (Not covered with my warrenty as it was a non lubricated part) I did a little research and found out the Viscous Coupling were only in the manuel models. So Subaru didnt have a clue what they were looking at. As Automatics have a clutchpack that is easy to replace without even taking the transmission out. I changed the oil in the transmission and i havent had one problem with it since. Always get a 2nd opinion or look up what they are telling you, as this could of cost you way too much to repair from the "service center"

    Herodias Posted on 17 February 2011 10:43am
  • I have had a My02 outback for 5 years and travel 15,000 per year mainly city and some country, so far has been a great family car and very very capable on those windy roads in the wet. Popped the clutch at 120K and was informed by subaru that the pressure plate was a required upgrade for this model so I had it done, no problems since. Tow's well and with the 2.5 limited pack < 5 speed > has proved to be a very comfortable car as well. Love it and have now gone out and bought a Gen4 GT premium wagon for myself and passed the outback to the wife because it is just so reliable and safe. Kids LOVE the dual sunroof. Could not recommend a better vehicle if you want comfort, room, handling and a safe ride. I am sure that like many cars there are always lemons but if you do your homework and pick a good one with full service history I doubt you will regret purchasing one. watch for shudder on full lock which could indicate center diff issues and I would suggest upgrading the lights. all round I would give it a 9/10 for being a car that it truly multi purpose, good cargo space, roof rails < get the racks >, towing capability provides a good all round package.

    Brent of Adelaide Posted on 10 February 2010 10:50pm
  • i bought my otback in 2001 , new i have had no trouble with it . i have 156000 kms , and gets severs every 6 months , i do about 12000 kms a year , with 2 lots of new tyres on ,i have not bought any major pats since i had it . i drive it until it starts needing parts

    col of ballina nsw Posted on 10 November 2009 6:16am
  • Bought a 2001 auto 2.5 outback new. When it had 2000km on clock, the aircon unit became noisy,(like a bearing) I asked for it to be rectified but the dealer said it was fine, it wasnt, I parted with 40 k of my hard earned money I contacted Subaru Australia and they wouldnt assist either. Absolutely poor after sales service, sold it 2003 and would never buy another subaru for these reasons.

    Rod of Perth Posted on 26 October 2009 3:26pm
  • Had a 2001 2.5 L auto outback. Good ride but had major overhang on front and back; tend to bottom out. Lights were poor in illumination. Car was regularly serviced(Service which was a bit expensive) but blew HG twice(heads were shaved), starter motor, radiator and transmission leaks. Rear lights filled with water(subaru rectified by just drilled holes in the lens). Stereo system pack it in after five years. Put 190K on the clock in 7 years mainly highway cycle. Subaru don’t recommend bull or roo bars on their vehicles which is impractical in roo country. Main reason I bought a Subaru (bought new) was for the legendary reliability. Based on the extra you pay for this reliability I’m totally disgusted with the brand and was happy to get rid of the thing. Medium to poor re-sale value: paid $43500 in 2001 and trade it in for $8000 in 2008.

    Peter Allen of Wester Australia Posted on 05 July 2009 2:47pm
Read all 6 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links