Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Subaru Forester XS: good not great

  • By Jonah Wigley
  • Carsguide
image The Subaru Forester XS can probably do a little better in the looks department.

I always have high expectations when I jump into a new Subaru.

The impeccable safety record, the reliable boxer engine and the constant improvements to ride, all contribute to my fondness and expectations.

So it’s slightly disappointing to reveal that the latest Forester doesn’t do much for me at all*.

And it’s not because it doesn’t deliver in the aforementioned areas – it does. It just looks so damn drab. But that’s no surprise; the Forester has always struggled aesthetically.

It’s a real wonder, given our growing demand for style and looks that it has been such a successful car. I suppose ‘successful’ is an understatement; this car has bobbled around in the top three in its class for over a decade. It’s the most popular car Subaru sell. So what’s going on here? How is this happening? Is it because it has such a good reputation?

I don’t think these heady days for the Forester can last without dramatic improvements to styling, inside and out. First it was the boxy, two tone brick; now it’s bigger but still boring. The base model interior is plasticky and unimaginative.

Like I said, I’m being harsh because I like Subarus. Great engine and safety, and it’s a comfy drive. I just think they can do a lot better in the looks department.

Do you agree, people? Am I going crazy and simply missing something obvious? Why are they so popular? Help?

*The XT turbo does look a bit better with its big bonnet scoop, buldging guards and wheel arches and other muscular features, but I am talking about the XS, the base model that most of us will be buying.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 14 comments

  • Found my used XS in May 2009. Great car and tows my 2004 Kimberley Escape Kamper much better than the MY02 Outback. Only problems are (1) remote locking needs reprogramming by Subaru and (2) cannot eject last CD in CD player; can insert more CD’s and play. Problem appears rife in USA and understand from an internal Subaru source that at least 4 CD players a week were being replaced in the Foresters prior to MY09 model.

    Martin of Melbourne Posted on 09 March 2012 12:31pm
  • Can anyone advise me on whether the MY10 XS Forester (2010) would be ok in the towing department? I own a Qunitrex 455 Coastrunner 40 hp outboard on a dunbiar trailer? The salesperson said it would be ok but I like to get other opinions. Never owned or driven a Forester before. Any advice please?

    Hugh of Lake Macquarie Posted on 21 August 2011 5:58pm
  • Firstly, Benno’s correct, the base model is the X. I would’ve thought someone who “likes” Subaru & is paid for these articles would have paid a little more attention. Secondly, the body (wheel arches etc) are exactly the same on the normally aspirated as the Turbo Charged variants.
    Thirdly, Chris, the Yokohama tyres are a relatively soft compound so if you haven’t taken care in ensuring correct tyre pressure, this could only be expected, not a Subaru fault, likewise with performance, this can only reflect your back tracking after a test drive - or did you not test drive first? If it drove like a dog, probably just needed tuning. Subaru is a premium Japanese brand and has always been recognised for value, integrity, safety, reliability and performance - however at the end of the day, they are mechanical and put together by man, not God. If it really were that bad, would you not have sold it earlier and moved on? Or is it that you actually enjoy your Forester? Yes I’m a die hard Suby fan; Forester is the most awarded all-terrain vehicle in Australia & also the number one selling compact SUV every month since May 08 & beauty is in the eye of the beholder - not the misinformed journo!

    Anna of Sydney Posted on 06 April 2010 11:05pm
  • I bought the first of the new series XS Forester in 2003 and it has been a real lemon.  Forget reliability, strength, good performance and durability.  It has been a shocker and has always driven like a real dog (must be the worst performing 2.5 litre 4 cylinder motor ever produced).  Hardly got 40,000kms out of the originally fitted Yokahama tyres. After only 130,000 kms now into 3rd flywheel (yes the flywheel - the first needed to be replaced at 45km when the car was still in warranty).  Rear and front near side shockers have just collapsed.  Subaru has to get replacement springs from Japan! Sunroof sized up after 110,000kms, then drivers side electrical window at 120,000kms (both motor and electronics in the door had to be replaced).  Rear vision mirror came off windscreen at just over 100,000km taking a chunk of glass out of the windscreen with it.  Other bits of plastic have come off the car throughout its life.  I owned a Subaru GX 1.8 litre 2WD Impreza before trading up to the Forester.  It was great little car, reliable, economical and a buzz to drive.  My wife loved it as well.  We both hate the XS Forester and couldn’t even recommend it our worst enemy.

    Chris Searle of Howes Valley NSW Posted on 09 February 2010 10:36pm
  • People who get paid to test cars should test them, and leave the looks part alone.

    Consumers know how a car looks, what we don’t know is what it’s like to drive and to live with. That’s what we want you to tell us

    ruralreg Posted on 24 January 2010 12:40pm
  • The X is the base model not the XS

    Benno Posted on 19 December 2009 10:40pm
  • Did not like it kept it for a year did my money and bought a real SUV.

    mjh of bne Posted on 06 April 2009 12:08am
  • The forester XS has the same body as the XT no more bulging guards than each other. Only the wheels are larger and the bonnet has a scoop. Also the XS is not the base model the X is.
    I think the Forester is a great looking car. Much better looking than some of it’s competitors like the CRV or X-Trail but I guess it all comes down to personal taste.
    I think most Subaru owners are more concerned about Active and Passive Safety which is unmatched by it’s peers.

    sang kim of melbourne Posted on 11 February 2009 9:42am
  • The XS looks great. Improvements include 20mm increase to 220mm road clearance; tow ball down weight increased to 140kg + load levelling; door window frames.  My MY02 Outback is twelfth Subaru owned in family, but is limited by 200mm road clearance and only 90kg tow ball down weight. Just waiting for a few used XS’s to come on market. Who cares about ego trips when you can get Subaru’s reliability, safety and retained value?

    Martin of Melbourne Posted on 23 January 2009 2:48pm
  • Ummm… common Jonah!!  Think a bit—it may not appeal to you but those middle class, greenie and tea-sipping brigade—it’s fantastic.
    Hey- looks are very unimportant to them—it’s reliability, economy, conservatism, etc.

    All the forrester owners I know can’t praise it enough—it will always be a good seller.etc.

    Andrew Paul of sydney Posted on 20 January 2009 2:55pm
  • I agree with your comments about the XS. You need to spend the bucks to get a real beast in the XT. The old model forester was iconic but is outdated. A move in the right direction.

    Mark Posted on 18 January 2009 11:20am
  • The 02 forester GT is the only version i find aesthetically pleasing, with a great rear and no two tone bumpers and the awesome scoop… however the thing i loved most about the car was its drive and useability, which i guess is the main reason people still flock to the forester. There is so much untapped potential for it here in Australia but Subaru are a conservative company and more worried about perceptions in other markets i.e. the USA to care what could give them a boost down under

    DQ Posted on 10 September 2008 11:03am
  • I find that people that drive Subarus don’t need an ego boost by driving a fashion statement around.  Forester owners generally have the lifestyles that the other (fashion conscience) SUV drivers seek.  I love the new shape and declare that curves were long overdue for drag coefficient.

    Nat of Melbourne Posted on 17 August 2008 9:41am
  • The original and its replacement brick were pleasing, now it looks like a mix between a Mitsubishy and japo/Americano trim. Most cars these days should fail to be impressively better and sadly the fashion of looking different dates a car ever more so. 
    Ever wonder why bland boring Toyota’s hold their value so well? (untill they tried being trendy)

    Craig of Newtown Posted on 14 June 2008 2:26pm
Read all 14 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links